将信任作为公共部门改革的一个神奇概念:丹麦和瑞典信任改革的比较研究

IF 2.3 3区管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

International Public Management Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-03 DOI:10.1080/10967494.2023.2223198

Tina Øllgaard Bentzen, Louise Bringselius

{"title":"将信任作为公共部门改革的一个神奇概念:丹麦和瑞典信任改革的比较研究","authors":"Tina Øllgaard Bentzen, Louise Bringselius","doi":"10.1080/10967494.2023.2223198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn response to growing criticism of new public management reforms, the Nordic countries have introduced so-called trust reforms aimed at transforming public sector management and leadership. There is, however, scarce knowledge about the role of organizational concepts in national trust reform and how they are translated, not least in a comparative perspective. This study offers an in-depth analysis of how robustly “trust” as a concept has been translated in Danish and Swedish public sector reforms. Drawing on the literature on organizational translation, we use the translational diamond as a theoretical framework for a comparative analysis based primarily on document studies, triangulated with supplementary survey data and interviews. Findings indicate that the Swedish reform has both a stronger strategic and local anchoring as well as a more elaborate use of reflective and experimental reform activities. However, the study also points to other factors of importance to robust translations, such as long-term commitment and political support. Additional informationNotes on contributorsTina Øllgaard BentzenTina Øllgaard Bentzen is an associate professor at Roskilde University in the Roskilde School of Governance. Her research focuses on participatory processes in the public sector and involves trust-based leadership, trust–control dynamics within public organizations, co-creation, translation of organizational concepts, and public sector reforms.Homepage: https://forskning.ruc.dk/da/persons/tinaobOrcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4181-7442Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tina-øllgaard-bentzen-7a55493b/Twitter: https://twitter.com/TinaolbenLouise BringseliusLouise Bringselius is an associate professor at Lund University and a Research Fellow at Stockholm School of Economics. She was the head of research at the Swedish Trust Commission from 2017 to 2019. Her research spans management studies and public administration, focusing primarily on leadership, governance, trust, and organizational culture, with a special focus on the public sector.Homepage: https://www.bringselius.se/ & https://portal.research.lu.se/sv/persons/louise-bringseliusOrcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3738-279XLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/louise-bringselius-15a9a46/Twitter: https://twitter.com/Bringselius","PeriodicalId":47671,"journal":{"name":"International Public Management Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translating trust as a magic concept in public sector reforms: A comparative study of the Danish and Swedish trust reform\",\"authors\":\"Tina Øllgaard Bentzen, Louise Bringselius\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10967494.2023.2223198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractIn response to growing criticism of new public management reforms, the Nordic countries have introduced so-called trust reforms aimed at transforming public sector management and leadership. There is, however, scarce knowledge about the role of organizational concepts in national trust reform and how they are translated, not least in a comparative perspective. This study offers an in-depth analysis of how robustly “trust” as a concept has been translated in Danish and Swedish public sector reforms. Drawing on the literature on organizational translation, we use the translational diamond as a theoretical framework for a comparative analysis based primarily on document studies, triangulated with supplementary survey data and interviews. Findings indicate that the Swedish reform has both a stronger strategic and local anchoring as well as a more elaborate use of reflective and experimental reform activities. However, the study also points to other factors of importance to robust translations, such as long-term commitment and political support. Additional informationNotes on contributorsTina Øllgaard BentzenTina Øllgaard Bentzen is an associate professor at Roskilde University in the Roskilde School of Governance. Her research focuses on participatory processes in the public sector and involves trust-based leadership, trust–control dynamics within public organizations, co-creation, translation of organizational concepts, and public sector reforms.Homepage: https://forskning.ruc.dk/da/persons/tinaobOrcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4181-7442Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tina-øllgaard-bentzen-7a55493b/Twitter: https://twitter.com/TinaolbenLouise BringseliusLouise Bringselius is an associate professor at Lund University and a Research Fellow at Stockholm School of Economics. She was the head of research at the Swedish Trust Commission from 2017 to 2019. Her research spans management studies and public administration, focusing primarily on leadership, governance, trust, and organizational culture, with a special focus on the public sector.Homepage: https://www.bringselius.se/ & https://portal.research.lu.se/sv/persons/louise-bringseliusOrcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3738-279XLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/louise-bringselius-15a9a46/Twitter: https://twitter.com/Bringselius\",\"PeriodicalId\":47671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Public Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Public Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2023.2223198\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Public Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2023.2223198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

为了回应对新的公共管理改革日益增长的批评，北欧国家引入了所谓的信任改革，旨在改变公共部门的管理和领导。然而，关于组织概念在国家信托改革中的作用以及如何转化的知识很少，尤其是从比较的角度来看。本研究深入分析了丹麦和瑞典公共部门改革中“信任”这一概念的落实情况。借鉴有关组织翻译的文献，我们以翻译菱形作为理论框架，在文献研究的基础上进行比较分析，并辅以调查数据和访谈。研究结果表明，瑞典的改革既具有更强的战略和地方锚定，也更详细地使用了反思和实验性的改革活动。然而，该研究也指出了其他因素对翻译的重要性，如长期承诺和政治支持。作者stina Øllgaard bentzina Øllgaard Bentzen是罗斯基勒大学管理学院的副教授。她的研究重点是公共部门的参与性过程，涉及基于信任的领导、公共组织内的信任控制动态、共同创造、组织概念的翻译和公共部门改革。主页:https://forskning.ruc.dk/da/persons/tinaobOrcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4181-7442Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tina-øllgaard-bentzen-7a55493b/Twitter: https://twitter.com/TinaolbenLouise Bringselius louise Bringselius，瑞典隆德大学副教授，斯德哥尔摩经济学院研究员。2017年至2019年，她担任瑞典信托委员会的研究主管。她的研究跨越管理研究和公共行政，主要关注领导力、治理、信任和组织文化，特别关注公共部门。主页:https://www.bringselius.se/ & https://portal.research.lu.se/sv/persons/louise-bringseliusOrcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3738-279XLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/louise-bringselius-15a9a46/Twitter: https://twitter.com/Bringselius

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Translating trust as a magic concept in public sector reforms: A comparative study of the Danish and Swedish trust reform

AbstractIn response to growing criticism of new public management reforms, the Nordic countries have introduced so-called trust reforms aimed at transforming public sector management and leadership. There is, however, scarce knowledge about the role of organizational concepts in national trust reform and how they are translated, not least in a comparative perspective. This study offers an in-depth analysis of how robustly “trust” as a concept has been translated in Danish and Swedish public sector reforms. Drawing on the literature on organizational translation, we use the translational diamond as a theoretical framework for a comparative analysis based primarily on document studies, triangulated with supplementary survey data and interviews. Findings indicate that the Swedish reform has both a stronger strategic and local anchoring as well as a more elaborate use of reflective and experimental reform activities. However, the study also points to other factors of importance to robust translations, such as long-term commitment and political support. Additional informationNotes on contributorsTina Øllgaard BentzenTina Øllgaard Bentzen is an associate professor at Roskilde University in the Roskilde School of Governance. Her research focuses on participatory processes in the public sector and involves trust-based leadership, trust–control dynamics within public organizations, co-creation, translation of organizational concepts, and public sector reforms.Homepage: https://forskning.ruc.dk/da/persons/tinaobOrcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4181-7442Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tina-øllgaard-bentzen-7a55493b/Twitter: https://twitter.com/TinaolbenLouise BringseliusLouise Bringselius is an associate professor at Lund University and a Research Fellow at Stockholm School of Economics. She was the head of research at the Swedish Trust Commission from 2017 to 2019. Her research spans management studies and public administration, focusing primarily on leadership, governance, trust, and organizational culture, with a special focus on the public sector.Homepage: https://www.bringselius.se/ & https://portal.research.lu.se/sv/persons/louise-bringseliusOrcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3738-279XLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/louise-bringselius-15a9a46/Twitter: https://twitter.com/Bringselius

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Public Management Journal PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

11.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Public Management Journal (IPMJ) publishes high-quality empirical and theoretical work on managing large organizations, particularly public organizations. IPMJ features work from scholars around the world who conduct research in the areas of public management and government reform, comparative public administration, organizational theory, and organizational behavior. IPMJ seeks to provide a bridge between those conducting research on public management and public administration on the one hand, and those working in the areas of organizational behavior and organization theory on the other. IPMJ intends to stimulate and reflect the academic interests of an international constituency of readers and scholars.