{"title":"紧急情况下的实践方法:多伦多黑人社区的灾后展望","authors":"Shamette Hepburn, Mary Goitom","doi":"10.1080/01488376.2023.2259933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThroughout the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, the vulnerability of Black and other racialized communities in Canada emerged as a key concern for health and social service providers, policymakers, and researchers. A compounding of structurally generated inequalities affected income, access to health and social services, and susceptibility to contracting COVID-19. Black communities were a focal point that provided evidence to this disproportionate impact of the pandemic. This research presents findings of a grounded theory study of 20 front-line staff who provide social services at a Toronto-based agency. Utilizing a survey and in-depth interviews, the study explored how social service provisions to Black communities were understood and implemented and what the prospects were for future preparedness. Conceptually, a Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) logic and a resilience lens were utilized to examine the agency’s capacity for developing sustainable partnerships with vulnerable communities, as framed by SDG 11—Sustainable Cities and (Inclusive and Resilient) Communities, and SDG 17—Sustainable Partnerships. Findings illustrate a sustainability challenge for supporting Black communities. The study recommends research on, and the utilization of practice models based on community-based resilience initiatives (CRIs) and an SDG logic in social service agencies to support interventions based on collaboration, inclusivity, and resilience in emergencies.Keywords: Post-disaster resiliencesustainable development goals (SDGs)community-based resilience initiativesblack communitiescanada AcknowledgementThe authors wish to thank the study’s participants and the funding agency, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) through a Partnership Engage Grant.","PeriodicalId":47419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Service Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to Practice in Emergency Contexts: Post-Disaster Outlook on Black Communities in Toronto\",\"authors\":\"Shamette Hepburn, Mary Goitom\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01488376.2023.2259933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThroughout the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, the vulnerability of Black and other racialized communities in Canada emerged as a key concern for health and social service providers, policymakers, and researchers. A compounding of structurally generated inequalities affected income, access to health and social services, and susceptibility to contracting COVID-19. Black communities were a focal point that provided evidence to this disproportionate impact of the pandemic. This research presents findings of a grounded theory study of 20 front-line staff who provide social services at a Toronto-based agency. Utilizing a survey and in-depth interviews, the study explored how social service provisions to Black communities were understood and implemented and what the prospects were for future preparedness. Conceptually, a Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) logic and a resilience lens were utilized to examine the agency’s capacity for developing sustainable partnerships with vulnerable communities, as framed by SDG 11—Sustainable Cities and (Inclusive and Resilient) Communities, and SDG 17—Sustainable Partnerships. Findings illustrate a sustainability challenge for supporting Black communities. The study recommends research on, and the utilization of practice models based on community-based resilience initiatives (CRIs) and an SDG logic in social service agencies to support interventions based on collaboration, inclusivity, and resilience in emergencies.Keywords: Post-disaster resiliencesustainable development goals (SDGs)community-based resilience initiativesblack communitiescanada AcknowledgementThe authors wish to thank the study’s participants and the funding agency, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) through a Partnership Engage Grant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Service Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Service Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2023.2259933\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Service Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2023.2259933","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
Approaches to Practice in Emergency Contexts: Post-Disaster Outlook on Black Communities in Toronto
AbstractThroughout the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, the vulnerability of Black and other racialized communities in Canada emerged as a key concern for health and social service providers, policymakers, and researchers. A compounding of structurally generated inequalities affected income, access to health and social services, and susceptibility to contracting COVID-19. Black communities were a focal point that provided evidence to this disproportionate impact of the pandemic. This research presents findings of a grounded theory study of 20 front-line staff who provide social services at a Toronto-based agency. Utilizing a survey and in-depth interviews, the study explored how social service provisions to Black communities were understood and implemented and what the prospects were for future preparedness. Conceptually, a Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) logic and a resilience lens were utilized to examine the agency’s capacity for developing sustainable partnerships with vulnerable communities, as framed by SDG 11—Sustainable Cities and (Inclusive and Resilient) Communities, and SDG 17—Sustainable Partnerships. Findings illustrate a sustainability challenge for supporting Black communities. The study recommends research on, and the utilization of practice models based on community-based resilience initiatives (CRIs) and an SDG logic in social service agencies to support interventions based on collaboration, inclusivity, and resilience in emergencies.Keywords: Post-disaster resiliencesustainable development goals (SDGs)community-based resilience initiativesblack communitiescanada AcknowledgementThe authors wish to thank the study’s participants and the funding agency, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) through a Partnership Engage Grant.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Social Service Research is exclusively devoted to empirical research and its application to the design, delivery, and management of the new social services. The Journal focuses on outcomes-based research and practice, and clearly presents the different types of funded and non-funded state-of-the-art research being carried out in the field. Each issue effectively highlights both the quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Contributors from the national and international social service arenas provide an important and critical basis for management and policy decisions in a wide variety of social service settings.