残疾主义的新衣:加拿大残疾人权利的成就与挑战

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Jonas-Sébastien Beaudry
{"title":"残疾主义的新衣:加拿大残疾人权利的成就与挑战","authors":"Jonas-Sébastien Beaudry","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a critical examination of disability rights in Canada in four policy domains: (a) the concept of disability; (b) non-discrimination and equality; (c) accessibility and inclusion; and (d) income support. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and scholarship from disability legal studies and the applied philosophy of disability provide normative benchmarks for the inquiry. The article identifies several shortcomings within political arrangements, policies, laws, and judicial decisions and traces them back to outdated but enduring conceptions of disability – namely, the ‘medical model,’ the ‘charity model,’ as well as other impacts of an ableist ideology, such as the normalization and disenfranchisement of persons with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":46289,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Law Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ableism’s New Clothes: Achievements and Challenges for Disability Rights in Canada\",\"authors\":\"Jonas-Sébastien Beaudry\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/utlj-2022-0082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article offers a critical examination of disability rights in Canada in four policy domains: (a) the concept of disability; (b) non-discrimination and equality; (c) accessibility and inclusion; and (d) income support. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and scholarship from disability legal studies and the applied philosophy of disability provide normative benchmarks for the inquiry. The article identifies several shortcomings within political arrangements, policies, laws, and judicial decisions and traces them back to outdated but enduring conceptions of disability – namely, the ‘medical model,’ the ‘charity model,’ as well as other impacts of an ableist ideology, such as the normalization and disenfranchisement of persons with disabilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Toronto Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Toronto Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2022-0082\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2022-0082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从四个政策领域对加拿大的残疾人权利进行了批判性审查:(a)残疾的概念;(b)不歧视和平等;(c)可及性和包容性;(d)收入支持。《残疾人权利公约》、残疾法律研究奖学金和残疾应用哲学为调查提供了规范性基准。这篇文章指出了政治安排、政策、法律和司法决定中的几个缺陷,并将它们追溯到过时但持久的残疾概念——即“医疗模式”、“慈善模式”,以及残疾主义意识形态的其他影响,如残疾人的正常化和剥夺权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ableism’s New Clothes: Achievements and Challenges for Disability Rights in Canada
This article offers a critical examination of disability rights in Canada in four policy domains: (a) the concept of disability; (b) non-discrimination and equality; (c) accessibility and inclusion; and (d) income support. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and scholarship from disability legal studies and the applied philosophy of disability provide normative benchmarks for the inquiry. The article identifies several shortcomings within political arrangements, policies, laws, and judicial decisions and traces them back to outdated but enduring conceptions of disability – namely, the ‘medical model,’ the ‘charity model,’ as well as other impacts of an ableist ideology, such as the normalization and disenfranchisement of persons with disabilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信