{"title":"社会经济基础上的亲代投资:东南与台湾的比较研究","authors":"Xi Chen, Li-Chung Hu","doi":"10.1080/10611932.2023.2251838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractDifferences in socioeconomic status have long been one of the major contributing factors to household educational investment, which is also a key concern in related research. Utilizing Panel Study of Family Dynamics (PSFD) datasets from 2003 to 2004, in this study we examine family investment in children’s education in southeast China and Taiwan, two core economic players in east Asia, with mainland China presenting much more social inequality than Taiwan, based on Gini coefficient measures. Our findings reveal that the different levels of parental investment in education are consistent with socioeconomic disparities, which vary significantly both quantitatively and qualitatively among mainland Chinese families from diverse social class backgrounds, but this gap appears to be narrowing among households in Taiwan. Parents’ level of education and income, deemed as the main class-based indicators, continue to be the determining factors in how families obtain and construct educational access, resources and opportunities for their offspring.Keywords: Educational inequalitymainland Chinaparental investmentsocioeconomic statusTaiwan NotesAcknowledgmentThe authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Please see http://psfd.sinica.edu.tw2 All the spending and income in Taiwan sample are converted to China Yuan (CNY) based on 2004 currency exchange rate.3 The deviance and Pearson goodness-of-fit tests are insignificant, thus instead of using negative binomial model, we performed Poisson regression.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 111-2410-H-004-113-MY2].Notes on contributorsXi ChenXi Chen is a graduate student in the Department of Sociology at National Chengchi University.Li-Chung HuLi-Chung Hu is an associate professor in the Department of Sociology at National Chengchi University.","PeriodicalId":39911,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Education and Society","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental Investment on a Socioeconomic Basis: A Comparative Study of Southeast China and Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"Xi Chen, Li-Chung Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611932.2023.2251838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractDifferences in socioeconomic status have long been one of the major contributing factors to household educational investment, which is also a key concern in related research. Utilizing Panel Study of Family Dynamics (PSFD) datasets from 2003 to 2004, in this study we examine family investment in children’s education in southeast China and Taiwan, two core economic players in east Asia, with mainland China presenting much more social inequality than Taiwan, based on Gini coefficient measures. Our findings reveal that the different levels of parental investment in education are consistent with socioeconomic disparities, which vary significantly both quantitatively and qualitatively among mainland Chinese families from diverse social class backgrounds, but this gap appears to be narrowing among households in Taiwan. Parents’ level of education and income, deemed as the main class-based indicators, continue to be the determining factors in how families obtain and construct educational access, resources and opportunities for their offspring.Keywords: Educational inequalitymainland Chinaparental investmentsocioeconomic statusTaiwan NotesAcknowledgmentThe authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Please see http://psfd.sinica.edu.tw2 All the spending and income in Taiwan sample are converted to China Yuan (CNY) based on 2004 currency exchange rate.3 The deviance and Pearson goodness-of-fit tests are insignificant, thus instead of using negative binomial model, we performed Poisson regression.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 111-2410-H-004-113-MY2].Notes on contributorsXi ChenXi Chen is a graduate student in the Department of Sociology at National Chengchi University.Li-Chung HuLi-Chung Hu is an associate professor in the Department of Sociology at National Chengchi University.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Education and Society\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Education and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2023.2251838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2023.2251838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Parental Investment on a Socioeconomic Basis: A Comparative Study of Southeast China and Taiwan
AbstractDifferences in socioeconomic status have long been one of the major contributing factors to household educational investment, which is also a key concern in related research. Utilizing Panel Study of Family Dynamics (PSFD) datasets from 2003 to 2004, in this study we examine family investment in children’s education in southeast China and Taiwan, two core economic players in east Asia, with mainland China presenting much more social inequality than Taiwan, based on Gini coefficient measures. Our findings reveal that the different levels of parental investment in education are consistent with socioeconomic disparities, which vary significantly both quantitatively and qualitatively among mainland Chinese families from diverse social class backgrounds, but this gap appears to be narrowing among households in Taiwan. Parents’ level of education and income, deemed as the main class-based indicators, continue to be the determining factors in how families obtain and construct educational access, resources and opportunities for their offspring.Keywords: Educational inequalitymainland Chinaparental investmentsocioeconomic statusTaiwan NotesAcknowledgmentThe authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Please see http://psfd.sinica.edu.tw2 All the spending and income in Taiwan sample are converted to China Yuan (CNY) based on 2004 currency exchange rate.3 The deviance and Pearson goodness-of-fit tests are insignificant, thus instead of using negative binomial model, we performed Poisson regression.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 111-2410-H-004-113-MY2].Notes on contributorsXi ChenXi Chen is a graduate student in the Department of Sociology at National Chengchi University.Li-Chung HuLi-Chung Hu is an associate professor in the Department of Sociology at National Chengchi University.
期刊介绍:
How is China"s vast population being educated in the home, the school, and the workplace? Chinese Education and Society is essential for insight into the latest Chinese thinking on educational policy and practice, educational reform and development, pedagogical theory and methods, colleges and universities, schools and families, as well as the education for diverse social groups across gender and youth, urban and rural, mainstream and minorities. It features unabridged translations of the most important articles in the field from Chinese sources, including scholarly journals and collections of articles published in book form. It also provides refereed research on specific themes.