在 COVID-19 大流行期间,针对儿童强迫症的强化认知行为疗法远程保健:与亲自治疗的匹配样本比较

Martin E. Franklin PhD , Jeffrey M. Engelmann PhD , Nyssa Z. Bulkes PhD , Gregor Horvath MS , Kelly Piacsek PhD , Erik Osterlund BA , Jennifer Freeman PhD , Rachel A. Schwartz PhD , Michael B. Himle PhD , Bradley C. Riemann PhD
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间,针对儿童强迫症的强化认知行为疗法远程保健:与亲自治疗的匹配样本比较","authors":"Martin E. Franklin PhD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Engelmann PhD ,&nbsp;Nyssa Z. Bulkes PhD ,&nbsp;Gregor Horvath MS ,&nbsp;Kelly Piacsek PhD ,&nbsp;Erik Osterlund BA ,&nbsp;Jennifer Freeman PhD ,&nbsp;Rachel A. Schwartz PhD ,&nbsp;Michael B. Himle PhD ,&nbsp;Bradley C. Riemann PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This naturalistic, nonblinded, nonrandomized study examined the efficacy of multimodal treatment including intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) delivered via telehealth (TH) compared with a matched sample of youth treated in person (IP).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Patients included 1,286 youth ages 7 to 17 inclusive (643 TH, 643 IP) who received TH or IP in either partial hospitalization (n = 818) or intensive outpatient (n = 468) programs. Changes in patient-rated OCD symptoms and quality of life from pretreatment to posttreatment were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>TH patients were discharged with a statistically higher Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Self-Report score than IP patients, although this group difference (1.4) was not clinically significant. Quality-of-life scores at discharge did not significantly differ between TH patients and IP patients. Treatment response was robust attesting to the broad applicability of the treatment model.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Youth receiving CBT via TH responded both well and comparably to youth treated IP, offering a viable access path forward. These findings extend the reach of CBT for pediatric OCD. Concerted efforts must now be made to improve CBT availability for families for whom financial, insurance, geographical, and other barriers preclude access at present.</p></div><div><h3>Diversity &amp; Inclusion Statement</h3><p>We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our reference list. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73525,"journal":{"name":"JAACAP open","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 26-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732923000492/pdfft?md5=33627e6832a0b9c7e8eb31737e6c9878&pid=1-s2.0-S2949732923000492-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensive Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Telehealth for Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison With a Matched Sample Treated in Person\",\"authors\":\"Martin E. Franklin PhD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Engelmann PhD ,&nbsp;Nyssa Z. Bulkes PhD ,&nbsp;Gregor Horvath MS ,&nbsp;Kelly Piacsek PhD ,&nbsp;Erik Osterlund BA ,&nbsp;Jennifer Freeman PhD ,&nbsp;Rachel A. Schwartz PhD ,&nbsp;Michael B. Himle PhD ,&nbsp;Bradley C. Riemann PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This naturalistic, nonblinded, nonrandomized study examined the efficacy of multimodal treatment including intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) delivered via telehealth (TH) compared with a matched sample of youth treated in person (IP).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Patients included 1,286 youth ages 7 to 17 inclusive (643 TH, 643 IP) who received TH or IP in either partial hospitalization (n = 818) or intensive outpatient (n = 468) programs. Changes in patient-rated OCD symptoms and quality of life from pretreatment to posttreatment were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>TH patients were discharged with a statistically higher Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Self-Report score than IP patients, although this group difference (1.4) was not clinically significant. Quality-of-life scores at discharge did not significantly differ between TH patients and IP patients. Treatment response was robust attesting to the broad applicability of the treatment model.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Youth receiving CBT via TH responded both well and comparably to youth treated IP, offering a viable access path forward. These findings extend the reach of CBT for pediatric OCD. Concerted efforts must now be made to improve CBT availability for families for whom financial, insurance, geographical, and other barriers preclude access at present.</p></div><div><h3>Diversity &amp; Inclusion Statement</h3><p>We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our reference list. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAACAP open\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 26-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732923000492/pdfft?md5=33627e6832a0b9c7e8eb31737e6c9878&pid=1-s2.0-S2949732923000492-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAACAP open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732923000492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAACAP open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732923000492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的这项自然、非盲法、非随机研究考察了通过远程医疗(TH)提供的包括强化认知行为疗法(CBT)在内的多模式治疗对小儿强迫症(OCD)的疗效,并与亲自治疗(IP)的匹配样本进行了比较。方法患者包括 1,286 名 7 至 17 岁的青少年(643 名接受远程保健治疗,643 名接受 IP 治疗),他们在部分住院治疗项目(818 人)或强化门诊治疗项目(468 人)中接受远程保健治疗或 IP 治疗。结果TH患者出院时的儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表自我报告得分高于IP患者,但这一群体差异(1.4)并无临床意义。TH患者和IP患者出院时的生活质量评分没有明显差异。治疗反应良好,证明该治疗模式具有广泛的适用性。结论通过 TH 接受 CBT 治疗的青少年反应良好,与接受 IP 治疗的青少年不相上下,为今后的治疗提供了一条可行的途径。这些发现扩大了 CBT 治疗小儿强迫症的范围。我们努力确保以包容的方式准备研究问卷。在招募参与者时,我们努力确保性别平衡。在招募人类参与者时,我们努力确保种族、民族和/或其他类型的多样性。我们积极致力于促进作者群的性别平衡。在引用与本研究相关的科学参考文献时,我们还积极促进了参考文献列表中的性别平衡。在引用与本研究相关的科学参考文献的同时,我们还积极致力于在参考文献列表中促进科学领域中历来代表性不足的种族和/或民族群体的融入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intensive Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Telehealth for Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison With a Matched Sample Treated in Person

Objective

This naturalistic, nonblinded, nonrandomized study examined the efficacy of multimodal treatment including intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) delivered via telehealth (TH) compared with a matched sample of youth treated in person (IP).

Method

Patients included 1,286 youth ages 7 to 17 inclusive (643 TH, 643 IP) who received TH or IP in either partial hospitalization (n = 818) or intensive outpatient (n = 468) programs. Changes in patient-rated OCD symptoms and quality of life from pretreatment to posttreatment were examined.

Results

TH patients were discharged with a statistically higher Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Self-Report score than IP patients, although this group difference (1.4) was not clinically significant. Quality-of-life scores at discharge did not significantly differ between TH patients and IP patients. Treatment response was robust attesting to the broad applicability of the treatment model.

Conclusion

Youth receiving CBT via TH responded both well and comparably to youth treated IP, offering a viable access path forward. These findings extend the reach of CBT for pediatric OCD. Concerted efforts must now be made to improve CBT availability for families for whom financial, insurance, geographical, and other barriers preclude access at present.

Diversity & Inclusion Statement

We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our reference list. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAACAP open
JAACAP open Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信