废奴主义者的愿景和热情的幽灵

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Rachael Isom
{"title":"废奴主义者的愿景和热情的幽灵","authors":"Rachael Isom","doi":"10.3138/ecf.35.4.503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By modern definitions, an “enthusiast” is a fan, but, in the eighteenth century, an enthusiast was a fanatic, and the word’s associations with religious heterodoxy made it a devastating weapon in the political arena. Critics often used this pejorative rhetoric to target anti-slavery activists. The charge of enthusiasm, while accurate in recognizing abolitionists’ energetic vision, helped detractors mischaracterize the movement as dangerously zealous. This essay takes as a case study Richard Newton’s 1792 sketch The Blind Enthusiast, which caricatures prominent abolitionist William Wilberforce as an easily fooled fanatic. Biblical allusions show Newton’s debt to religious rhetoric, while political catchwords invoke key debates of the 1790s. The stereotype does not remain in the past, however. As this essay argues, the notion of the enthusiastic abolitionist troubles activism in the twenty-first century, too, impeding efforts toward more equitable futures.","PeriodicalId":43800,"journal":{"name":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abolitionist Visions and the Spectre of Enthusiasm\",\"authors\":\"Rachael Isom\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/ecf.35.4.503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By modern definitions, an “enthusiast” is a fan, but, in the eighteenth century, an enthusiast was a fanatic, and the word’s associations with religious heterodoxy made it a devastating weapon in the political arena. Critics often used this pejorative rhetoric to target anti-slavery activists. The charge of enthusiasm, while accurate in recognizing abolitionists’ energetic vision, helped detractors mischaracterize the movement as dangerously zealous. This essay takes as a case study Richard Newton’s 1792 sketch The Blind Enthusiast, which caricatures prominent abolitionist William Wilberforce as an easily fooled fanatic. Biblical allusions show Newton’s debt to religious rhetoric, while political catchwords invoke key debates of the 1790s. The stereotype does not remain in the past, however. As this essay argues, the notion of the enthusiastic abolitionist troubles activism in the twenty-first century, too, impeding efforts toward more equitable futures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eighteenth-Century Fiction\",\"volume\":\"154 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eighteenth-Century Fiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.35.4.503\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.35.4.503","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

按照现代的定义,“发烧友”就是狂热者,但在18世纪,发烧友就是狂热者,这个词与宗教异端的联系使其成为政治舞台上的毁灭性武器。批评者经常用这种轻蔑的言辞来攻击反奴隶制活动人士。对热情的指责,虽然准确地认识到了废奴主义者充满活力的愿景,但帮助批评者错误地将该运动描述为危险的狂热。本文以理查德·牛顿1792年的素描《盲目的狂热者》为例,该素描将著名废奴主义者威廉·威尔伯福斯讽刺为一个容易被愚弄的狂热者。圣经中的典故显示了牛顿对宗教修辞的贡献,而政治流行语则唤起了18世纪90年代的关键辩论。然而,这种刻板印象并没有停留在过去。正如本文所论述的那样,热心废奴主义者的概念也困扰着21世纪的激进主义,阻碍着为更公平的未来所做的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abolitionist Visions and the Spectre of Enthusiasm
By modern definitions, an “enthusiast” is a fan, but, in the eighteenth century, an enthusiast was a fanatic, and the word’s associations with religious heterodoxy made it a devastating weapon in the political arena. Critics often used this pejorative rhetoric to target anti-slavery activists. The charge of enthusiasm, while accurate in recognizing abolitionists’ energetic vision, helped detractors mischaracterize the movement as dangerously zealous. This essay takes as a case study Richard Newton’s 1792 sketch The Blind Enthusiast, which caricatures prominent abolitionist William Wilberforce as an easily fooled fanatic. Biblical allusions show Newton’s debt to religious rhetoric, while political catchwords invoke key debates of the 1790s. The stereotype does not remain in the past, however. As this essay argues, the notion of the enthusiastic abolitionist troubles activism in the twenty-first century, too, impeding efforts toward more equitable futures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信