接受碳酸氢钠治疗的2个月以下患者颅内出血发生率4.2% vs 8.4%

Maria Spilios, Ferras Bashqoy, Anasemon Saad, Elena V. Wachtel, Joanna Tracy
{"title":"接受碳酸氢钠治疗的2个月以下患者颅内出血发生率4.2% vs 8.4%","authors":"Maria Spilios, Ferras Bashqoy, Anasemon Saad, Elena V. Wachtel, Joanna Tracy","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-28.5.446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE To assess the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), including intraventricular hemorrhage, in infants receiving 4.2% or 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. METHODS This is a single-center retrospective chart review of neonates and infants with a gestational age (GA) >32 weeks and a postnatal age <2 months who received sodium bicarbonate in an intensive care unit at an academic tertiary children’s hospital. The primary outcome was the incidence of ICH in patients with baseline and follow-up head imaging. The secondary outcome was the incidence of ICH on follow-up head imaging, with or without baseline head imaging. RESULTS There were 351 patients screened, with 135 meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 84% were born ≥37 weeks GA. Forty-two met the criteria for the primary outcome. Study participants were further subdivided into 3 groups based on the concentration of sodium bicarbonate received: only 4.2%, only 8.4%, or a mixed group that received at least 1 dose each of 4.2% and 8.4%. Intracranial hemorrhage was noted in 1 patient in each group: 8.3%, 5.6%, and 8.3%, respectively (p = 1.00). For the secondary outcome, 11 ICHs were seen on head imaging: 11.3%, 3.8%, and 10%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of ICH (p = 0.325). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of ICH in term neonates and infants was not significantly different in those receiving 4.2% vs 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. Although additional studies are needed, this study suggests it may be possible to safely expand the use of 8.4% in neonates/infants ≥37 weeks GA. These results should not be applied to preterm neonates (<37 weeks GA and/or <1500 g) or neonates with additional ICH risk factors.","PeriodicalId":22794,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients Younger Than 2 Months Receiving Sodium Bicarbonate 4.2% vs 8.4%\",\"authors\":\"Maria Spilios, Ferras Bashqoy, Anasemon Saad, Elena V. Wachtel, Joanna Tracy\",\"doi\":\"10.5863/1551-6776-28.5.446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE To assess the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), including intraventricular hemorrhage, in infants receiving 4.2% or 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. METHODS This is a single-center retrospective chart review of neonates and infants with a gestational age (GA) >32 weeks and a postnatal age <2 months who received sodium bicarbonate in an intensive care unit at an academic tertiary children’s hospital. The primary outcome was the incidence of ICH in patients with baseline and follow-up head imaging. The secondary outcome was the incidence of ICH on follow-up head imaging, with or without baseline head imaging. RESULTS There were 351 patients screened, with 135 meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 84% were born ≥37 weeks GA. Forty-two met the criteria for the primary outcome. Study participants were further subdivided into 3 groups based on the concentration of sodium bicarbonate received: only 4.2%, only 8.4%, or a mixed group that received at least 1 dose each of 4.2% and 8.4%. Intracranial hemorrhage was noted in 1 patient in each group: 8.3%, 5.6%, and 8.3%, respectively (p = 1.00). For the secondary outcome, 11 ICHs were seen on head imaging: 11.3%, 3.8%, and 10%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of ICH (p = 0.325). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of ICH in term neonates and infants was not significantly different in those receiving 4.2% vs 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. Although additional studies are needed, this study suggests it may be possible to safely expand the use of 8.4% in neonates/infants ≥37 weeks GA. These results should not be applied to preterm neonates (<37 weeks GA and/or <1500 g) or neonates with additional ICH risk factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-28.5.446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-28.5.446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估接受4.2%或8.4%碳酸氢钠治疗的婴儿颅内出血(ICH)的发生率,包括脑室内出血。方法:本研究是一项单中心回顾性图表综述,研究对象为在某学术三级儿童医院重症监护室接受碳酸氢钠治疗的胎龄(GA) 32周和出生年龄(GA) 2个月的新生儿和婴儿。主要结果是基线和随访头部成像患者的脑出血发生率。次要结果是随访头部成像时脑出血的发生率,有或没有基线头部成像。结果共筛选351例患者,其中135例符合纳入标准。其中,84%出生时≥37周。42人符合主要结果的标准。研究参与者根据接受的碳酸氢钠浓度进一步细分为3组:仅4.2%,仅8.4%,或混合组,分别接受4.2%和8.4%的至少一次剂量。两组各有1例颅内出血,分别为8.3%、5.6%、8.3% (p = 1.00)。对于次要结果,头部成像显示有11例ICHs:分别为11.3%、3.8%和10%。两组脑出血发生率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.325)。结论:4.2%碳酸氢钠组和8.4%碳酸氢钠组足月新生儿和婴儿脑出血发生率无显著差异。虽然还需要进一步的研究,但本研究表明,在出生年龄≥37周的新生儿/婴儿中安全地扩大8.4%的使用是可能的。这些结果不适用于早产新生儿(孕龄37周和/或1500 g)或有其他脑出血危险因素的新生儿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients Younger Than 2 Months Receiving Sodium Bicarbonate 4.2% vs 8.4%
OBJECTIVE To assess the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), including intraventricular hemorrhage, in infants receiving 4.2% or 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. METHODS This is a single-center retrospective chart review of neonates and infants with a gestational age (GA) >32 weeks and a postnatal age <2 months who received sodium bicarbonate in an intensive care unit at an academic tertiary children’s hospital. The primary outcome was the incidence of ICH in patients with baseline and follow-up head imaging. The secondary outcome was the incidence of ICH on follow-up head imaging, with or without baseline head imaging. RESULTS There were 351 patients screened, with 135 meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 84% were born ≥37 weeks GA. Forty-two met the criteria for the primary outcome. Study participants were further subdivided into 3 groups based on the concentration of sodium bicarbonate received: only 4.2%, only 8.4%, or a mixed group that received at least 1 dose each of 4.2% and 8.4%. Intracranial hemorrhage was noted in 1 patient in each group: 8.3%, 5.6%, and 8.3%, respectively (p = 1.00). For the secondary outcome, 11 ICHs were seen on head imaging: 11.3%, 3.8%, and 10%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of ICH (p = 0.325). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of ICH in term neonates and infants was not significantly different in those receiving 4.2% vs 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. Although additional studies are needed, this study suggests it may be possible to safely expand the use of 8.4% in neonates/infants ≥37 weeks GA. These results should not be applied to preterm neonates (<37 weeks GA and/or <1500 g) or neonates with additional ICH risk factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信