《书写民族:中世纪晚期苏格兰的宫廷诗歌与历史权威》凯瑟琳·h·特雷尔著(书评)

IF 0.1 4区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
{"title":"《书写民族:中世纪晚期苏格兰的宫廷诗歌与历史权威》凯瑟琳·h·特雷尔著(书评)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Scripting the Nation: Court Poetry and the Authority of History in Late Medieval Scotland by Katherine H. Terrell Emily Wingfield Scripting the Nation: Court Poetry and the Authority of History in Late Medieval Scotland. By Katherine H. Terrell. (Interventions: New Studies in Medieval Culture) Columbus: Ohio State University Press. 2021. viii+ 232 pp. $99.95 ISBN 978–0–8142–1462–6. Katherine H. Terrell's richly inventive study positions a range of fourteenth- to sixteenth-century Scottish chronicle material alongside the works of poets connected to the court of James IV, and she deftly explores how this material both appropriates and subverts English literary and historiographical models in order to assert—often simultaneously—literary and territorial sovereignty. Indeed, Terrell's work is unique in juxtaposing—and demonstrating the close relationship between—Scotland's historiographical tradition and the works of those writers commonly labelled 'Scots Chaucerians'. Scripting the Nation significantly advances scholarship in both areas as a result. Terrell begins by outlining the War of Historiography which accompanied the physical battles of the period's Wars of Independence: Edward I and Edward II both seized upon Galfridian myths which traced English origins to Brutus and the Trojans in order to bolster their claims to lordship and ownership of Scotland; to counteract this, and prove Scotland's independence and superior cultural status, Scottish historians instead traced their origins to a Greek prince, Gaythelos, and his Egyptian wife, Scota. Terrell's theoretically informed readings of John Hardyng's Chronicle are a real highlight here: in focusing on his forgery of evidence to support England's claims to Scotland, and on the role in certain manuscript witnesses of additional maps and marginalia that assert and document an interest in the same claims, she demonstrates how Hardyng created a past tailor-made to serve the imperialist interests of his monarchs' (p. 24). Having observed that Scottish writers of the period regularly 'engage in a complex dance of deference to and defiance against their English models' (p. 5), in Chapter 2 Terrell explores how John of Fordun responded in his late fourteenth-century Chronica Gentis Scotorum to Geoffrey of Monmouth's use of the Trojan origin legend. She articulates how Fordun deliberately set Geoffrey's narrative against the alternative and genealogically focused Greek Scottish origin legend, whilst simultaneously leaving open the contradictions of his various source materials, in order to reveal 'history as contested political ground' (p. 61). In next demonstrating how Walter Bower found ways to assert the superior morality and hereditary lineage of the Scots in his mid-fifteenth-century Scotichronicon, and carefully attending to the text's actual and ideal readers, Terrell makes a strong case for viewing Bower's project as the 'creation of a textual community' (p. 66); history, she argues, not only provided for Bower precedent and 'a repository for the identity of a people and nation' but also helped to 'forge that identity out of the great deeds of the past and translate it into the future' (p. 87). Chapter 4 looks closely at two examples of the period's actual textual community: the Sinclair manuscript (Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Arch. Selden. B. 24) and the Asloan manuscript (Edinburgh, NLS, MS 16500). Terrell here demonstrates [End Page 607] how, just as earlier historians both appropriated and defied English historiography (p. 38), so too do we find in the latter manuscript a 'scribe and reader [who] was able to value both Anglophobic history and Anglophile literature' (p. 103), and in the former a homage to Chaucerian poetry and a proud Scotticization of that poetry. Chapters 5 and 6 focus on William Dunbar's attitudes toward national identity and cultural heritage. The first offers some astute close readings of some of Dunbar's best-known poems and further demonstrates how he sets about defining himself both alongside and against Chaucer. The second focuses on Dunbar's less studied petitionary poems, and suggests that, by manipulating traditions of courtly love poetry, Dunbar attempts to establish a new era of Scottish court poetry. Chapter 7's study of Gavin Douglas's Eneados is a fitting culmination. Terrell here concentrates on Douglas's attitudes to the Scots vernacular and self...","PeriodicalId":45399,"journal":{"name":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scripting the Nation: Court Poetry and the Authority of History in Late Medieval Scotland by Katherine H. Terrell (review)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mlr.2023.a907853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Scripting the Nation: Court Poetry and the Authority of History in Late Medieval Scotland by Katherine H. Terrell Emily Wingfield Scripting the Nation: Court Poetry and the Authority of History in Late Medieval Scotland. By Katherine H. Terrell. (Interventions: New Studies in Medieval Culture) Columbus: Ohio State University Press. 2021. viii+ 232 pp. $99.95 ISBN 978–0–8142–1462–6. Katherine H. Terrell's richly inventive study positions a range of fourteenth- to sixteenth-century Scottish chronicle material alongside the works of poets connected to the court of James IV, and she deftly explores how this material both appropriates and subverts English literary and historiographical models in order to assert—often simultaneously—literary and territorial sovereignty. Indeed, Terrell's work is unique in juxtaposing—and demonstrating the close relationship between—Scotland's historiographical tradition and the works of those writers commonly labelled 'Scots Chaucerians'. Scripting the Nation significantly advances scholarship in both areas as a result. Terrell begins by outlining the War of Historiography which accompanied the physical battles of the period's Wars of Independence: Edward I and Edward II both seized upon Galfridian myths which traced English origins to Brutus and the Trojans in order to bolster their claims to lordship and ownership of Scotland; to counteract this, and prove Scotland's independence and superior cultural status, Scottish historians instead traced their origins to a Greek prince, Gaythelos, and his Egyptian wife, Scota. Terrell's theoretically informed readings of John Hardyng's Chronicle are a real highlight here: in focusing on his forgery of evidence to support England's claims to Scotland, and on the role in certain manuscript witnesses of additional maps and marginalia that assert and document an interest in the same claims, she demonstrates how Hardyng created a past tailor-made to serve the imperialist interests of his monarchs' (p. 24). Having observed that Scottish writers of the period regularly 'engage in a complex dance of deference to and defiance against their English models' (p. 5), in Chapter 2 Terrell explores how John of Fordun responded in his late fourteenth-century Chronica Gentis Scotorum to Geoffrey of Monmouth's use of the Trojan origin legend. She articulates how Fordun deliberately set Geoffrey's narrative against the alternative and genealogically focused Greek Scottish origin legend, whilst simultaneously leaving open the contradictions of his various source materials, in order to reveal 'history as contested political ground' (p. 61). In next demonstrating how Walter Bower found ways to assert the superior morality and hereditary lineage of the Scots in his mid-fifteenth-century Scotichronicon, and carefully attending to the text's actual and ideal readers, Terrell makes a strong case for viewing Bower's project as the 'creation of a textual community' (p. 66); history, she argues, not only provided for Bower precedent and 'a repository for the identity of a people and nation' but also helped to 'forge that identity out of the great deeds of the past and translate it into the future' (p. 87). Chapter 4 looks closely at two examples of the period's actual textual community: the Sinclair manuscript (Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Arch. Selden. B. 24) and the Asloan manuscript (Edinburgh, NLS, MS 16500). Terrell here demonstrates [End Page 607] how, just as earlier historians both appropriated and defied English historiography (p. 38), so too do we find in the latter manuscript a 'scribe and reader [who] was able to value both Anglophobic history and Anglophile literature' (p. 103), and in the former a homage to Chaucerian poetry and a proud Scotticization of that poetry. Chapters 5 and 6 focus on William Dunbar's attitudes toward national identity and cultural heritage. The first offers some astute close readings of some of Dunbar's best-known poems and further demonstrates how he sets about defining himself both alongside and against Chaucer. The second focuses on Dunbar's less studied petitionary poems, and suggests that, by manipulating traditions of courtly love poetry, Dunbar attempts to establish a new era of Scottish court poetry. Chapter 7's study of Gavin Douglas's Eneados is a fitting culmination. Terrell here concentrates on Douglas's attitudes to the Scots vernacular and self...\",\"PeriodicalId\":45399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907853\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2023.a907853","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

凯瑟琳·h·特雷尔·艾米丽·温菲尔德的《书写民族:中世纪晚期苏格兰的宫廷诗歌与历史权威》。凯瑟琳·h·特雷尔著。(干预:中世纪文化的新研究)哥伦布:俄亥俄州立大学出版社,2021。viii+ 232 pp. $99.95 ISBN 978-0-8142-1462-6。凯瑟琳·h·特雷尔(Katherine H. Terrell)富有创造性的研究将一系列14至16世纪的苏格兰编年史材料与与詹姆斯四世宫廷有关的诗人的作品放在一起,她巧妙地探索了这些材料如何既恰当又颠覆了英国文学和历史编纂模式,以维护文学和领土主权——通常是同时进行的。的确,特雷尔的作品是独一无二的,他将苏格兰的史学传统与那些通常被称为“苏格兰乔叟”的作家的作品并置,并展示了两者之间的密切关系。因此,“国家脚本”在这两个领域都显著地促进了奖学金的发展。特雷尔首先概述了与独立战争时期的实际战斗相伴随的史学战争:爱德华一世和爱德华二世都抓住了加尔弗里德神话,将英国的起源追溯到布鲁图斯和特洛伊人,以支持他们对苏格兰的主权和所有权;为了抵消这一点,并证明苏格兰的独立和优越的文化地位,苏格兰历史学家转而将其起源追溯到希腊王子盖特罗斯和他的埃及妻子斯科塔。特雷尔从理论上对约翰·哈丁的《编年史》进行了充分的解读,这是本书的一大亮点:她关注的是哈丁伪造证据来支持英格兰对苏格兰的主权主张,以及在某些手稿中见证了其他地图和旁注的作用,这些地图和旁注断言并记录了对同样主张的兴趣,她展示了哈丁是如何为他的君主的帝国主义利益量身定制一个过去的(第24页)。观察到这一时期的苏格兰作家经常“参与一种复杂的舞蹈,既顺从又蔑视他们的英国模式”(第5页),在第二章中,特雷尔探讨了福尔顿的约翰在他的14世纪晚期的纪事纪事中是如何回应蒙茅斯的杰弗里使用的特洛伊起源传说的。她阐明了福尔登是如何故意将杰弗里的叙述与另一种以谱系为中心的希腊苏格兰血统传说对立起来的,同时让他的各种来源材料的矛盾公开化,以揭示“作为有争议的政治领域的历史”(第61页)。接下来,特雷尔展示了沃尔特·鲍尔如何在15世纪中期的《苏格兰编年史》中找到了维护苏格兰人优越道德和世袭血统的方法,并仔细关注了文本的实际和理想读者,他有力地证明了鲍尔的项目是“文本社区的创造”(第66页);她认为,历史不仅为鲍尔提供了先例和“一个民族和国家身份的储存库”,而且还帮助“从过去的伟大事迹中塑造出这种身份,并将其转化为未来”(第87页)。第四章密切关注这一时期实际文本社区的两个例子:辛克莱手稿(牛津大学,博德利图书馆,MS Arch;塞尔登。B. 24)和Asloan手稿(Edinburgh, NLS, MS 16500)。在这里,特雷尔论证了[End Page 607],正如早期的历史学家对英国史学既加以利用又加以蔑视一样(第38页),我们也在后者的手稿中发现了一位“能够同时重视恐英历史和亲英文学的抄写员和读者”(第103页),在前者中,他向乔叟诗歌致敬,并自豪地将其苏格兰化。第五章和第六章关注威廉·邓巴对民族认同和文化遗产的态度。第一部分提供了一些邓巴最著名的诗歌的精辟解读进一步展示了他是如何定义自己的同时又与乔叟对立。第二篇关注邓巴较少研究的请愿诗,并指出,通过操纵宫廷爱情诗的传统,邓巴试图建立一个苏格兰宫廷诗歌的新时代。第七章对加文·道格拉斯的《埃内多斯》的研究是一个恰当的高潮。在这里,特雷尔专注于道格拉斯对苏格兰方言和自我的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scripting the Nation: Court Poetry and the Authority of History in Late Medieval Scotland by Katherine H. Terrell (review)
Reviewed by: Scripting the Nation: Court Poetry and the Authority of History in Late Medieval Scotland by Katherine H. Terrell Emily Wingfield Scripting the Nation: Court Poetry and the Authority of History in Late Medieval Scotland. By Katherine H. Terrell. (Interventions: New Studies in Medieval Culture) Columbus: Ohio State University Press. 2021. viii+ 232 pp. $99.95 ISBN 978–0–8142–1462–6. Katherine H. Terrell's richly inventive study positions a range of fourteenth- to sixteenth-century Scottish chronicle material alongside the works of poets connected to the court of James IV, and she deftly explores how this material both appropriates and subverts English literary and historiographical models in order to assert—often simultaneously—literary and territorial sovereignty. Indeed, Terrell's work is unique in juxtaposing—and demonstrating the close relationship between—Scotland's historiographical tradition and the works of those writers commonly labelled 'Scots Chaucerians'. Scripting the Nation significantly advances scholarship in both areas as a result. Terrell begins by outlining the War of Historiography which accompanied the physical battles of the period's Wars of Independence: Edward I and Edward II both seized upon Galfridian myths which traced English origins to Brutus and the Trojans in order to bolster their claims to lordship and ownership of Scotland; to counteract this, and prove Scotland's independence and superior cultural status, Scottish historians instead traced their origins to a Greek prince, Gaythelos, and his Egyptian wife, Scota. Terrell's theoretically informed readings of John Hardyng's Chronicle are a real highlight here: in focusing on his forgery of evidence to support England's claims to Scotland, and on the role in certain manuscript witnesses of additional maps and marginalia that assert and document an interest in the same claims, she demonstrates how Hardyng created a past tailor-made to serve the imperialist interests of his monarchs' (p. 24). Having observed that Scottish writers of the period regularly 'engage in a complex dance of deference to and defiance against their English models' (p. 5), in Chapter 2 Terrell explores how John of Fordun responded in his late fourteenth-century Chronica Gentis Scotorum to Geoffrey of Monmouth's use of the Trojan origin legend. She articulates how Fordun deliberately set Geoffrey's narrative against the alternative and genealogically focused Greek Scottish origin legend, whilst simultaneously leaving open the contradictions of his various source materials, in order to reveal 'history as contested political ground' (p. 61). In next demonstrating how Walter Bower found ways to assert the superior morality and hereditary lineage of the Scots in his mid-fifteenth-century Scotichronicon, and carefully attending to the text's actual and ideal readers, Terrell makes a strong case for viewing Bower's project as the 'creation of a textual community' (p. 66); history, she argues, not only provided for Bower precedent and 'a repository for the identity of a people and nation' but also helped to 'forge that identity out of the great deeds of the past and translate it into the future' (p. 87). Chapter 4 looks closely at two examples of the period's actual textual community: the Sinclair manuscript (Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Arch. Selden. B. 24) and the Asloan manuscript (Edinburgh, NLS, MS 16500). Terrell here demonstrates [End Page 607] how, just as earlier historians both appropriated and defied English historiography (p. 38), so too do we find in the latter manuscript a 'scribe and reader [who] was able to value both Anglophobic history and Anglophile literature' (p. 103), and in the former a homage to Chaucerian poetry and a proud Scotticization of that poetry. Chapters 5 and 6 focus on William Dunbar's attitudes toward national identity and cultural heritage. The first offers some astute close readings of some of Dunbar's best-known poems and further demonstrates how he sets about defining himself both alongside and against Chaucer. The second focuses on Dunbar's less studied petitionary poems, and suggests that, by manipulating traditions of courtly love poetry, Dunbar attempts to establish a new era of Scottish court poetry. Chapter 7's study of Gavin Douglas's Eneados is a fitting culmination. Terrell here concentrates on Douglas's attitudes to the Scots vernacular and self...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: With an unbroken publication record since 1905, its 1248 pages are divided between articles, predominantly on medieval and modern literature, in the languages of continental Europe, together with English (including the United States and the Commonwealth), Francophone Africa and Canada, and Latin America. In addition, MLR reviews over five hundred books each year The MLR Supplement The Modern Language Review was founded in 1905 and has included well over 3,000 articles and some 20,000 book reviews. This supplement to Volume 100 is published by the Modern Humanities Research Association in celebration of the centenary of its flagship journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信