对本科生社区行动形成活动的评价

Ester García Ovejero, María Caballero Galilea, Edmundo Fernández Piñeiro, Laura Lorenzo Allegue, José Miguel Mansilla Domínguez
{"title":"对本科生社区行动形成活动的评价","authors":"Ester García Ovejero, María Caballero Galilea, Edmundo Fernández Piñeiro, Laura Lorenzo Allegue, José Miguel Mansilla Domínguez","doi":"10.35667/metasenf.2023.26.1003082160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to evaluate the level of learning and the methodology of an academic paper on the design of a local community activity.Method: a mixed evaluative study conducted on Nursing students. After a theoretical introduction on community action, 144 students formed teams and, during two months, conducted a partially real population analysis, article mapping and bibliographic search in order to understand the lifestyles, search and critical analysis of previous community experiences, and design a proposal of activity. Professors graded it through signature (0 to 10 scores), and students were offered an evaluation through four open questions and two closed-ended questions (interest generated and the need to maintain the training activity, Likert scales with min. 1 to max. 5). Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted, as well as content analysis.Results: the activity was conducted by 27 groups, who achieved a median score of 8.17. It was then evaluated by 96 students, who considered that it was interesting (x–= 4.29) and should be maintained (x–= 4.17). They identified as “necessary” and important the health promotion projects in the local community and the work shared with it. They showed that they had discovered another area of professional action. They scarcely showed salutogenic vision and had difficulties to focus the task on a search for bibliography and previous experiences.Conclusion: the activity was successfully conducted by students, and the desired familiarity with the community work was achieved at short term. Students met difficulties to develop the methodology but perceived the activity as interesting and relevant.","PeriodicalId":387967,"journal":{"name":"Metas de Enfermería","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluación de una actividad formativa en acción comunitaria realizada por estudiantes pregrado\",\"authors\":\"Ester García Ovejero, María Caballero Galilea, Edmundo Fernández Piñeiro, Laura Lorenzo Allegue, José Miguel Mansilla Domínguez\",\"doi\":\"10.35667/metasenf.2023.26.1003082160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: to evaluate the level of learning and the methodology of an academic paper on the design of a local community activity.Method: a mixed evaluative study conducted on Nursing students. After a theoretical introduction on community action, 144 students formed teams and, during two months, conducted a partially real population analysis, article mapping and bibliographic search in order to understand the lifestyles, search and critical analysis of previous community experiences, and design a proposal of activity. Professors graded it through signature (0 to 10 scores), and students were offered an evaluation through four open questions and two closed-ended questions (interest generated and the need to maintain the training activity, Likert scales with min. 1 to max. 5). Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted, as well as content analysis.Results: the activity was conducted by 27 groups, who achieved a median score of 8.17. It was then evaluated by 96 students, who considered that it was interesting (x–= 4.29) and should be maintained (x–= 4.17). They identified as “necessary” and important the health promotion projects in the local community and the work shared with it. They showed that they had discovered another area of professional action. They scarcely showed salutogenic vision and had difficulties to focus the task on a search for bibliography and previous experiences.Conclusion: the activity was successfully conducted by students, and the desired familiarity with the community work was achieved at short term. Students met difficulties to develop the methodology but perceived the activity as interesting and relevant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metas de Enfermería\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metas de Enfermería\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35667/metasenf.2023.26.1003082160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metas de Enfermería","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35667/metasenf.2023.26.1003082160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估一篇关于当地社区活动设计的学术论文的学习水平和方法。方法:采用混合评价法对护理专业学生进行调查。在对社区行动进行理论介绍后,144名学生组成小组,在两个月的时间里,进行了部分真实的人口分析、文章制图和书目检索,以了解生活方式,对以往的社区经验进行搜索和批判性分析,并设计了活动方案。教授们通过签名打分(0到10分),学生们通过4个开放式问题和2个封闭式问题(产生的兴趣和维持训练活动的需要,李克特量表从最小到最大)进行评估。5)进行描述性统计分析,并进行内容分析。结果:活动共进行27组,平均得分为8.17分。然后由96名学生进行评估,他们认为这是有趣的(x - = 4.29),应该保持(x - = 4.17)。他们认为当地社区的健康促进项目和与之共同开展的工作是"必要的"和重要的。他们表明,他们发现了另一个专业行动领域。他们几乎没有表现出有益健康的眼光,很难把任务集中在查找参考书目和以前的经验上。总结:本次活动是由学生成功进行的,在短期内达到了对社区工作的熟悉程度。学生们在开发方法方面遇到了困难,但他们认为这项活动很有趣,也很相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluación de una actividad formativa en acción comunitaria realizada por estudiantes pregrado
Objective: to evaluate the level of learning and the methodology of an academic paper on the design of a local community activity.Method: a mixed evaluative study conducted on Nursing students. After a theoretical introduction on community action, 144 students formed teams and, during two months, conducted a partially real population analysis, article mapping and bibliographic search in order to understand the lifestyles, search and critical analysis of previous community experiences, and design a proposal of activity. Professors graded it through signature (0 to 10 scores), and students were offered an evaluation through four open questions and two closed-ended questions (interest generated and the need to maintain the training activity, Likert scales with min. 1 to max. 5). Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted, as well as content analysis.Results: the activity was conducted by 27 groups, who achieved a median score of 8.17. It was then evaluated by 96 students, who considered that it was interesting (x–= 4.29) and should be maintained (x–= 4.17). They identified as “necessary” and important the health promotion projects in the local community and the work shared with it. They showed that they had discovered another area of professional action. They scarcely showed salutogenic vision and had difficulties to focus the task on a search for bibliography and previous experiences.Conclusion: the activity was successfully conducted by students, and the desired familiarity with the community work was achieved at short term. Students met difficulties to develop the methodology but perceived the activity as interesting and relevant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信