责任是举报人制度发展的法律和思想基础

L.V. Radovetska, O.K. Tugharova
{"title":"责任是举报人制度发展的法律和思想基础","authors":"L.V. Radovetska, O.K. Tugharova","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of the development of modern society, on the one hand, issues of national security have acquired a considerable scale of acuteness in their development, and on the other hand, they have become an impetus for rethinking complex approaches, initiation and development of various processes, caused the creation of various institutions, in particular, the system of anti-corruption bodies, in particular, the development of well-thought out effective mechanisms of their functioning. The article raises an actual problem in modern science and practice related to the understanding and proper perception of the institution of whistleblowers - a source and tool for obtaining acute, relevant, socially significant information. Just yesterday’s legislative amendment, which at the legislative level regulated the issue of obtaining «insider» information about the illegal actions of individuals in the context of anti-corruption issues, but today it is already a really effective mechanism, which, in particular, allows under the conditions of the legal regime of martial law to counteract various threats , because today all the forces and resources of the Ukrainian state are aimed at countering internal and external threats. In the context of approaches to understanding social responsibility and the social nature of whistleblowers, the authors attempt to reveal the potential of this concept and the opportunities that open up in connection with its further scientific understanding. In this regard, aspects of both legal and ideological issues are highlighted, and legal issues are first of all detailed and analyzed. The interdisciplinary nature of the whistleblowers institute is emphasized. The legislative plan proposes the expediency of distinguishing the right to information disclosure in the context of the modern information rights’ formation. The distinction between whistleblowers and other related concepts is emphasized. Options for solving legal problems are offered, as well as prospects for their development.","PeriodicalId":474211,"journal":{"name":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsibility as a legal and ideological basis in the whistleblowers’ institute development\",\"authors\":\"L.V. Radovetska, O.K. Tugharova\",\"doi\":\"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the context of the development of modern society, on the one hand, issues of national security have acquired a considerable scale of acuteness in their development, and on the other hand, they have become an impetus for rethinking complex approaches, initiation and development of various processes, caused the creation of various institutions, in particular, the system of anti-corruption bodies, in particular, the development of well-thought out effective mechanisms of their functioning. The article raises an actual problem in modern science and practice related to the understanding and proper perception of the institution of whistleblowers - a source and tool for obtaining acute, relevant, socially significant information. Just yesterday’s legislative amendment, which at the legislative level regulated the issue of obtaining «insider» information about the illegal actions of individuals in the context of anti-corruption issues, but today it is already a really effective mechanism, which, in particular, allows under the conditions of the legal regime of martial law to counteract various threats , because today all the forces and resources of the Ukrainian state are aimed at countering internal and external threats. In the context of approaches to understanding social responsibility and the social nature of whistleblowers, the authors attempt to reveal the potential of this concept and the opportunities that open up in connection with its further scientific understanding. In this regard, aspects of both legal and ideological issues are highlighted, and legal issues are first of all detailed and analyzed. The interdisciplinary nature of the whistleblowers institute is emphasized. The legislative plan proposes the expediency of distinguishing the right to information disclosure in the context of the modern information rights’ formation. The distinction between whistleblowers and other related concepts is emphasized. Options for solving legal problems are offered, as well as prospects for their development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":474211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现代社会发展的背景下,一方面,国家安全问题在其发展中获得了相当大的尖锐程度,另一方面,它已成为重新思考复杂方法,启动和发展各种进程的动力,导致了各种机构的创建,特别是反腐败机构体系,特别是其运作机制的发展。这篇文章提出了现代科学和实践中的一个实际问题,即如何理解和正确认识举报人制度——一种获取尖锐的、相关的、具有社会意义的信息的来源和工具。就在昨天的立法修正案,它在立法层面规范了在反腐败问题背景下获取个人非法行为的“内幕”信息的问题,但今天它已经是一个真正有效的机制,特别是允许在戒严法的法律制度下对抗各种威胁。因为今天乌克兰国家的所有力量和资源都旨在应对内部和外部威胁。在理解社会责任和举报人的社会性质的方法的背景下,作者试图揭示这一概念的潜力,以及与进一步科学理解相关的机会。在这方面,法律问题和思想问题都是突出的方面,首先是法律问题的详细分析。强调了举报人研究所的跨学科性质。立法方案提出了在现代信息权利形成的背景下区分信息公开权的权宜之计。强调了举报人与其他相关概念之间的区别。提出了解决法律问题的各种办法及其发展前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responsibility as a legal and ideological basis in the whistleblowers’ institute development
In the context of the development of modern society, on the one hand, issues of national security have acquired a considerable scale of acuteness in their development, and on the other hand, they have become an impetus for rethinking complex approaches, initiation and development of various processes, caused the creation of various institutions, in particular, the system of anti-corruption bodies, in particular, the development of well-thought out effective mechanisms of their functioning. The article raises an actual problem in modern science and practice related to the understanding and proper perception of the institution of whistleblowers - a source and tool for obtaining acute, relevant, socially significant information. Just yesterday’s legislative amendment, which at the legislative level regulated the issue of obtaining «insider» information about the illegal actions of individuals in the context of anti-corruption issues, but today it is already a really effective mechanism, which, in particular, allows under the conditions of the legal regime of martial law to counteract various threats , because today all the forces and resources of the Ukrainian state are aimed at countering internal and external threats. In the context of approaches to understanding social responsibility and the social nature of whistleblowers, the authors attempt to reveal the potential of this concept and the opportunities that open up in connection with its further scientific understanding. In this regard, aspects of both legal and ideological issues are highlighted, and legal issues are first of all detailed and analyzed. The interdisciplinary nature of the whistleblowers institute is emphasized. The legislative plan proposes the expediency of distinguishing the right to information disclosure in the context of the modern information rights’ formation. The distinction between whistleblowers and other related concepts is emphasized. Options for solving legal problems are offered, as well as prospects for their development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信