AHP和TOPSIS作为评价城市公园吸引力的方法:以波兰罗兹为例

IF 0.4 Q4 GEOGRAPHY
Marcin Feltynowski, Agnieszka Rzeńca, Piotr Rzeńca, Wiktor Wróblewski
{"title":"AHP和TOPSIS作为评价城市公园吸引力的方法:以波兰罗兹为例","authors":"Marcin Feltynowski, Agnieszka Rzeńca, Piotr Rzeńca, Wiktor Wróblewski","doi":"10.18778/1231-1952.30.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban parks are significant elements that improve the quality of life in built-up areas. This research aims to identify the most attractive park in Lodz, Poland, using a set of assessment indicators. In our opinion, the decision-making process in assessing the attractiveness of urban parks may be assisted by Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Two methods were chosen from the MCDA group, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The research shows that the proposed methods reveal which park needs support and calls for investment.","PeriodicalId":43719,"journal":{"name":"European Spatial Research and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AHP and TOPSIS as methods assessing the attractiveness of urban parks: The case of Lodz, Poland\",\"authors\":\"Marcin Feltynowski, Agnieszka Rzeńca, Piotr Rzeńca, Wiktor Wróblewski\",\"doi\":\"10.18778/1231-1952.30.1.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Urban parks are significant elements that improve the quality of life in built-up areas. This research aims to identify the most attractive park in Lodz, Poland, using a set of assessment indicators. In our opinion, the decision-making process in assessing the attractiveness of urban parks may be assisted by Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Two methods were chosen from the MCDA group, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The research shows that the proposed methods reveal which park needs support and calls for investment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spatial Research and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spatial Research and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.30.1.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spatial Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.30.1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市公园是提高建成区生活质量的重要元素。本研究旨在使用一套评估指标来确定波兰罗兹最具吸引力的公园。我们认为,在评估城市公园吸引力的决策过程中,可以借助于多标准决策分析(MCDA)。从MCDA组中选择了两种方法,即层次分析法(AHP)和理想解相似性排序偏好法(TOPSIS)。研究表明,所提出的方法揭示了哪些公园需要支持和需要投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AHP and TOPSIS as methods assessing the attractiveness of urban parks: The case of Lodz, Poland
Urban parks are significant elements that improve the quality of life in built-up areas. This research aims to identify the most attractive park in Lodz, Poland, using a set of assessment indicators. In our opinion, the decision-making process in assessing the attractiveness of urban parks may be assisted by Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Two methods were chosen from the MCDA group, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The research shows that the proposed methods reveal which park needs support and calls for investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信