在涉及精神障碍患者的刑事诉讼中法院判决的特殊性

O.I. Tyshchenko
{"title":"在涉及精神障碍患者的刑事诉讼中法院判决的特殊性","authors":"O.I. Tyshchenko","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article, based on the analysis of the provisions of criminal and criminal procedural law and relevant judicial practice, reveals the peculiarities of the court decision in which compulsory medical measures are applied to persons with limited criminal convictions. Such peculiarities include: the adoption of a court decision regarding defendants with limited convictions in the form of a sentence; the regulatory limitation of the variability of compulsory medical measures only by the provision of outpatient psychiatric care on a compulsory basis; inconsistency in the terms of the prescribed punishment and the use of compulsory medical measures. The latter determines the logic of the question regarding the need for the simultaneous application of two criminal-legal measures of a different nature. It is noted that the procedure for applying compulsory medical measures to persons with a limited criminal record is related to criminal proceedings regarding the application of compulsory medical measures (Chapter 39 of the CPC).In the context of the problems considered, the issue of the possibility of concluding and approving an agreement in criminal proceedings involving persons suffering from mental disorders is investigated. Both court decisions that approved such an agreement and court verdicts that refused to approve the agreement are analyzed from the point of view of argumentation. In terms of three key aspects (the subject of criminal procedural consensus; voluntariness as one of the manifestations of criminal procedural capacity; prospects for fulfilling the terms of the concluded agreement), the position is expressed regarding the expediency of enshrining at the legislative level the impossibility of concluding and approving an agreement with the participation of a suspect, an accused person who has a limited criminal record. It is proposed to extend a similar approach to the victim suffering from mental disorders and to determine that it is impossible to conclude a reconciliation agreement with their participation.","PeriodicalId":474211,"journal":{"name":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peculiarities of a court decision in criminal proceedings involving persons suffering from mental disorders\",\"authors\":\"O.I. Tyshchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article, based on the analysis of the provisions of criminal and criminal procedural law and relevant judicial practice, reveals the peculiarities of the court decision in which compulsory medical measures are applied to persons with limited criminal convictions. Such peculiarities include: the adoption of a court decision regarding defendants with limited convictions in the form of a sentence; the regulatory limitation of the variability of compulsory medical measures only by the provision of outpatient psychiatric care on a compulsory basis; inconsistency in the terms of the prescribed punishment and the use of compulsory medical measures. The latter determines the logic of the question regarding the need for the simultaneous application of two criminal-legal measures of a different nature. It is noted that the procedure for applying compulsory medical measures to persons with a limited criminal record is related to criminal proceedings regarding the application of compulsory medical measures (Chapter 39 of the CPC).In the context of the problems considered, the issue of the possibility of concluding and approving an agreement in criminal proceedings involving persons suffering from mental disorders is investigated. Both court decisions that approved such an agreement and court verdicts that refused to approve the agreement are analyzed from the point of view of argumentation. In terms of three key aspects (the subject of criminal procedural consensus; voluntariness as one of the manifestations of criminal procedural capacity; prospects for fulfilling the terms of the concluded agreement), the position is expressed regarding the expediency of enshrining at the legislative level the impossibility of concluding and approving an agreement with the participation of a suspect, an accused person who has a limited criminal record. It is proposed to extend a similar approach to the victim suffering from mental disorders and to determine that it is impossible to conclude a reconciliation agreement with their participation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":474211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在分析刑法和刑事诉讼法规定及相关司法实践的基础上,揭示了对刑事定罪有限的人适用强制医疗措施的法院判决的特殊性。这些特点包括:以判刑的形式对定罪有限的被告作出法院裁决;对强制性医疗措施可变性的监管限制,仅通过在强制性基础上提供门诊精神病治疗;规定的处罚和强制医疗措施的使用不一致。后者决定了是否需要同时适用两种不同性质的刑事法律措施这一问题的逻辑。委员会注意到,对犯罪记录有限的人适用强制医疗措施的程序与适用强制医疗措施的刑事诉讼有关(《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第39章)。在所审议的问题范围内,研究了在涉及精神病患者的刑事诉讼中缔结和核准协议的可能性问题。从论证的角度分析了批准该协议的法院判决和拒绝批准该协议的法院判决。在三个关键方面(刑事诉讼共识主体;自愿是刑事诉讼能力的表现之一;鉴于履行所缔结协定条款的前景),代表们认为,在立法一级规定不可能缔结和核准有犯罪记录有限的嫌疑犯、被告参与的协定,是一种权宜之计。建议对患有精神疾病的受害者采取类似的做法,并确定在他们参与的情况下不可能缔结和解协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peculiarities of a court decision in criminal proceedings involving persons suffering from mental disorders
The article, based on the analysis of the provisions of criminal and criminal procedural law and relevant judicial practice, reveals the peculiarities of the court decision in which compulsory medical measures are applied to persons with limited criminal convictions. Such peculiarities include: the adoption of a court decision regarding defendants with limited convictions in the form of a sentence; the regulatory limitation of the variability of compulsory medical measures only by the provision of outpatient psychiatric care on a compulsory basis; inconsistency in the terms of the prescribed punishment and the use of compulsory medical measures. The latter determines the logic of the question regarding the need for the simultaneous application of two criminal-legal measures of a different nature. It is noted that the procedure for applying compulsory medical measures to persons with a limited criminal record is related to criminal proceedings regarding the application of compulsory medical measures (Chapter 39 of the CPC).In the context of the problems considered, the issue of the possibility of concluding and approving an agreement in criminal proceedings involving persons suffering from mental disorders is investigated. Both court decisions that approved such an agreement and court verdicts that refused to approve the agreement are analyzed from the point of view of argumentation. In terms of three key aspects (the subject of criminal procedural consensus; voluntariness as one of the manifestations of criminal procedural capacity; prospects for fulfilling the terms of the concluded agreement), the position is expressed regarding the expediency of enshrining at the legislative level the impossibility of concluding and approving an agreement with the participation of a suspect, an accused person who has a limited criminal record. It is proposed to extend a similar approach to the victim suffering from mental disorders and to determine that it is impossible to conclude a reconciliation agreement with their participation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信