{"title":"1787年《约瑟芬法典》编纂工作的特点","authors":"R.V. Savuliak","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author considered the peculiarities of the codification process of concluding the Josephine Code of 1787 in the Habsburg monarchy. At the same time, first of all, the state of the scientific research of the specified problem was analyzed both in the science of the history of Austrian law, in the 19th century and in modern, as well as in Ukrainian historical and legal science. The article reveals the prerequisites for concluding the Josephine Code as a result of the revision of the Draft of Codex Theresianus of 1766. The main focus of the study is on highlighting the stages of long-term codification work on the Josephine Code, namely, such as: presentation of expert comments on the Draft, lectures-responses to them by the Legislative Commission under the leadership of Hofrat Zenker, remarks of the conceptualist of the State Council Johann Bernhard Horten on these lectures-responses, consultations-discussions of the Draft in the State Council and consultations of the Legislative Commission headed by J.-B. Horten.The article provides examples of opposition to the adoption of the Josephine Code, in particular the demand for the complete abolition of Roman law as the source of law of the Habsburg monarchy. Particular attention is paid to the legal and technical guidelines, principles of such revision established in the patent of Empress Maria Theresa on the revision of the Draft of Codex Theresianus of 1772.The author revealed the influence of Emperor Joseph II on the final adoption of the first part of the Josephine Code (on personal law), which provided for the rights of individuals and, most importantly, regulated marriage and family law, namely the relationship between spouses and parents and children, as well as the institution of guardianship. In addition, the article describes the structure of the first part of the Code. Moreover, the author clarified the peculiarity of the name of this legislative act and clarified the name of its original source. In conclusion, the author substantiates the historical and legal significance of the Josephine Code.","PeriodicalId":474211,"journal":{"name":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Features of the codification works on the Josephine Code of 1787\",\"authors\":\"R.V. Savuliak\",\"doi\":\"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author considered the peculiarities of the codification process of concluding the Josephine Code of 1787 in the Habsburg monarchy. At the same time, first of all, the state of the scientific research of the specified problem was analyzed both in the science of the history of Austrian law, in the 19th century and in modern, as well as in Ukrainian historical and legal science. The article reveals the prerequisites for concluding the Josephine Code as a result of the revision of the Draft of Codex Theresianus of 1766. The main focus of the study is on highlighting the stages of long-term codification work on the Josephine Code, namely, such as: presentation of expert comments on the Draft, lectures-responses to them by the Legislative Commission under the leadership of Hofrat Zenker, remarks of the conceptualist of the State Council Johann Bernhard Horten on these lectures-responses, consultations-discussions of the Draft in the State Council and consultations of the Legislative Commission headed by J.-B. Horten.The article provides examples of opposition to the adoption of the Josephine Code, in particular the demand for the complete abolition of Roman law as the source of law of the Habsburg monarchy. Particular attention is paid to the legal and technical guidelines, principles of such revision established in the patent of Empress Maria Theresa on the revision of the Draft of Codex Theresianus of 1772.The author revealed the influence of Emperor Joseph II on the final adoption of the first part of the Josephine Code (on personal law), which provided for the rights of individuals and, most importantly, regulated marriage and family law, namely the relationship between spouses and parents and children, as well as the institution of guardianship. In addition, the article describes the structure of the first part of the Code. Moreover, the author clarified the peculiarity of the name of this legislative act and clarified the name of its original source. In conclusion, the author substantiates the historical and legal significance of the Josephine Code.\",\"PeriodicalId\":474211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
作者考虑了1787年在哈布斯堡王朝编纂《约瑟芬法典》的特殊性。同时,首先分析了19世纪和现代奥地利法史科学以及乌克兰历史和法律科学对特定问题的科学研究状况。本文揭示了1766年特莱西安努法典草案修订后,《约瑟芬法典》得以成书的先决条件。本研究的主要重点是强调约瑟芬法典长期编纂工作的各个阶段,即:专家对草案的意见介绍,在Hofrat Zenker领导下的立法委员会对这些意见的演讲-回应,国务院概念学家Johann Bernhard Horten对这些演讲-回应的评论,国务院对草案的讨论和以j - b为首的立法委员会的磋商。兄弟。这篇文章提供了反对采用《约瑟芬法典》的例子,特别是要求完全废除作为哈布斯堡王朝法律渊源的罗马法。特别注意的是法律和技术指导方针,这种修订的原则建立在玛丽亚·特蕾莎皇后关于1772年特蕾西亚努斯法典草案修订的专利中。提交人透露了约瑟夫二世皇帝对最终通过《约瑟芬法典》第一部分(关于属人法)的影响,该部分规定了个人的权利,最重要的是规范了婚姻和家庭法,即配偶、父母和子女之间的关系,以及监护制度。此外,本文还介绍了守则第一部分的结构。此外,作者还澄清了该立法法案名称的特殊性,并澄清了其原始来源的名称。最后,作者论证了《约瑟芬法典》的历史意义和法律意义。
Features of the codification works on the Josephine Code of 1787
The author considered the peculiarities of the codification process of concluding the Josephine Code of 1787 in the Habsburg monarchy. At the same time, first of all, the state of the scientific research of the specified problem was analyzed both in the science of the history of Austrian law, in the 19th century and in modern, as well as in Ukrainian historical and legal science. The article reveals the prerequisites for concluding the Josephine Code as a result of the revision of the Draft of Codex Theresianus of 1766. The main focus of the study is on highlighting the stages of long-term codification work on the Josephine Code, namely, such as: presentation of expert comments on the Draft, lectures-responses to them by the Legislative Commission under the leadership of Hofrat Zenker, remarks of the conceptualist of the State Council Johann Bernhard Horten on these lectures-responses, consultations-discussions of the Draft in the State Council and consultations of the Legislative Commission headed by J.-B. Horten.The article provides examples of opposition to the adoption of the Josephine Code, in particular the demand for the complete abolition of Roman law as the source of law of the Habsburg monarchy. Particular attention is paid to the legal and technical guidelines, principles of such revision established in the patent of Empress Maria Theresa on the revision of the Draft of Codex Theresianus of 1772.The author revealed the influence of Emperor Joseph II on the final adoption of the first part of the Josephine Code (on personal law), which provided for the rights of individuals and, most importantly, regulated marriage and family law, namely the relationship between spouses and parents and children, as well as the institution of guardianship. In addition, the article describes the structure of the first part of the Code. Moreover, the author clarified the peculiarity of the name of this legislative act and clarified the name of its original source. In conclusion, the author substantiates the historical and legal significance of the Josephine Code.