帕米膦酸钠和沙利度胺治疗难治性轴型脊柱炎的疗效比较:一项开放标签随机临床试验

Nadia Sultana, A F M Mahbubul Alam, Iftekhar Hussain Bandhan Bandhan, Md Masudul Hasaan, Md Golam Rabbani, Md Ekramul Kabir, Md Abu Shahin, Minhaj Rahim Choudhury, Syed Atiqul Haq, Mohammad Mostafa Zaman
{"title":"帕米膦酸钠和沙利度胺治疗难治性轴型脊柱炎的疗效比较:一项开放标签随机临床试验","authors":"Nadia Sultana, A F M Mahbubul Alam, Iftekhar Hussain Bandhan Bandhan, Md Masudul Hasaan, Md Golam Rabbani, Md Ekramul Kabir, Md Abu Shahin, Minhaj Rahim Choudhury, Syed Atiqul Haq, Mohammad Mostafa Zaman","doi":"10.3329/jbcps.v41i4.68930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a chronic systemic inflammatory rheumatic disease affecting sacroiliac joints, spine and peripheral joints. Pamidronate and thalidomide are proven to be effective in refractory axial SpA in some studies. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of pamidronate and thalidomide in refractory axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods: This open label randomized clinical trial was conducted on refractory SpA patients at the department of rheumatology of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka. Pamidronate 60mg intravenous monthly and thalidomide 200mg/day were given to pamidronate and thalidomide groups, respectively for 6 months. Both groups received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and therapeutic exercises. More than 20% improvements in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS-20) at 6 months were considered as primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis meteorological index (BASMI), patient global assessment, physician global assessment, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, ASAS 40 etc. Results: Significant improvement in ASAS 20 was observed in both pamidronate (76.9%) and thalidomide (85.2%) groups (P=0.501). Among the secondary outcome ASAS 40 response rates were 46.2% and 51.9% in the pamidronate and thalidomide groups respectively. All other secondary outcome indicators such as BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI etc. within-group showed significant improvements in both groups (P<0.001). Between-group differences were nonsignificant (P>0.1) except for ESR (P=0.006). There were no serious adverse events in any group. Conclusions: Pamidronate and thalidomide were effective in refractory axial SpA and were well tolerated. However, there was no significant difference in the efficacy of the two drugs. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2023; 41(4): 269-276","PeriodicalId":105305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons","volume":"30 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Efficacy of Pamidronate and Thalidomide for the Treatment of Refractory Axial Spondyloarthritis: An Open Label Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Sultana, A F M Mahbubul Alam, Iftekhar Hussain Bandhan Bandhan, Md Masudul Hasaan, Md Golam Rabbani, Md Ekramul Kabir, Md Abu Shahin, Minhaj Rahim Choudhury, Syed Atiqul Haq, Mohammad Mostafa Zaman\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jbcps.v41i4.68930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a chronic systemic inflammatory rheumatic disease affecting sacroiliac joints, spine and peripheral joints. Pamidronate and thalidomide are proven to be effective in refractory axial SpA in some studies. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of pamidronate and thalidomide in refractory axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods: This open label randomized clinical trial was conducted on refractory SpA patients at the department of rheumatology of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka. Pamidronate 60mg intravenous monthly and thalidomide 200mg/day were given to pamidronate and thalidomide groups, respectively for 6 months. Both groups received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and therapeutic exercises. More than 20% improvements in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS-20) at 6 months were considered as primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis meteorological index (BASMI), patient global assessment, physician global assessment, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, ASAS 40 etc. Results: Significant improvement in ASAS 20 was observed in both pamidronate (76.9%) and thalidomide (85.2%) groups (P=0.501). Among the secondary outcome ASAS 40 response rates were 46.2% and 51.9% in the pamidronate and thalidomide groups respectively. All other secondary outcome indicators such as BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI etc. within-group showed significant improvements in both groups (P<0.001). Between-group differences were nonsignificant (P>0.1) except for ESR (P=0.006). There were no serious adverse events in any group. Conclusions: Pamidronate and thalidomide were effective in refractory axial SpA and were well tolerated. However, there was no significant difference in the efficacy of the two drugs. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2023; 41(4): 269-276\",\"PeriodicalId\":105305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons\",\"volume\":\"30 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcps.v41i4.68930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcps.v41i4.68930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:脊椎关节炎(Spondyloarthritis, SpA)是一种影响骶髂关节、脊柱和周围关节的慢性全身性炎症性风湿病。帕米膦酸盐和沙利度胺在一些研究中被证明是有效的难治性轴向SpA。本研究旨在比较帕米膦酸盐和沙利度胺治疗难治性轴性脊柱性关节炎(SpA)的疗效和安全性。方法:该开放标签随机临床试验在达卡Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学风湿病学系的难治性SpA患者中进行。帕米膦酸酯组和沙利度胺组分别给予帕米膦酸酯60mg /月静脉滴注,沙利度胺200mg/天,疗程6个月。两组均接受非甾体抗炎药物治疗和治疗性锻炼。在6个月时,国际脊椎关节炎评估协会(ASAS-20)的改善超过20%被认为是主要结局指标。次要观察指标包括巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动性指数(BASDAI)、巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数(BASFI)、巴斯强直性脊柱炎气象指数(BASMI)、患者总体评价、医生总体评价、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、c反应蛋白、ASAS 40等。结果:帕米膦酸钠组(76.9%)和沙利度胺组(85.2%)的asa 20均有显著改善(P=0.501)。在次要结局中,帕米膦酸钠组和沙利度胺组的缓解率分别为46.2%和51.9%。组内其他次要结局指标如BASDAI、BASFI、BASMI等均有显著改善(P<0.001)。除ESR (P=0.006)外,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.1)。两组均无严重不良事件发生。结论:帕米膦酸钠联合沙利度胺治疗难治性轴性SpA有效且耐受性良好。然而,两种药物的疗效无显著差异。[J]孟加拉大学物理外科20123;41 (4): 269 - 276
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Efficacy of Pamidronate and Thalidomide for the Treatment of Refractory Axial Spondyloarthritis: An Open Label Randomized Clinical Trial
Introduction: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a chronic systemic inflammatory rheumatic disease affecting sacroiliac joints, spine and peripheral joints. Pamidronate and thalidomide are proven to be effective in refractory axial SpA in some studies. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of pamidronate and thalidomide in refractory axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods: This open label randomized clinical trial was conducted on refractory SpA patients at the department of rheumatology of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka. Pamidronate 60mg intravenous monthly and thalidomide 200mg/day were given to pamidronate and thalidomide groups, respectively for 6 months. Both groups received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and therapeutic exercises. More than 20% improvements in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS-20) at 6 months were considered as primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis meteorological index (BASMI), patient global assessment, physician global assessment, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, ASAS 40 etc. Results: Significant improvement in ASAS 20 was observed in both pamidronate (76.9%) and thalidomide (85.2%) groups (P=0.501). Among the secondary outcome ASAS 40 response rates were 46.2% and 51.9% in the pamidronate and thalidomide groups respectively. All other secondary outcome indicators such as BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI etc. within-group showed significant improvements in both groups (P<0.001). Between-group differences were nonsignificant (P>0.1) except for ESR (P=0.006). There were no serious adverse events in any group. Conclusions: Pamidronate and thalidomide were effective in refractory axial SpA and were well tolerated. However, there was no significant difference in the efficacy of the two drugs. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2023; 41(4): 269-276
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信