《没有法律出路:瑞安诉家庭暴力和对胁迫的辩护》，作者:纳迪亚·维雷利和洛里·钱伯斯

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW

OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.60082/2817-5069.3928

Abigail March

{"title":"《没有法律出路:瑞安诉家庭暴力和对胁迫的辩护》，作者:纳迪亚·维雷利和洛里·钱伯斯","authors":"Abigail March","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The defence of duress in Canadian criminal law has been described by scholars and judges as a “complicated mess,” “[o]ften confusing and potentially gendered,” and “irrational, anomalous, perverse, illogical and fundamentally wrong.” The most recent Supreme Court of Canada case to attempt to bring clarity to the embattled duress defence, R v Ryan (“Ryan”), is the focus of Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers’ No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress (“No Legal Way Out”).","PeriodicalId":45757,"journal":{"name":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","volume":"163 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress by Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers\",\"authors\":\"Abigail March\",\"doi\":\"10.60082/2817-5069.3928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The defence of duress in Canadian criminal law has been described by scholars and judges as a “complicated mess,” “[o]ften confusing and potentially gendered,” and “irrational, anomalous, perverse, illogical and fundamentally wrong.” The most recent Supreme Court of Canada case to attempt to bring clarity to the embattled duress defence, R v Ryan (“Ryan”), is the focus of Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers’ No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress (“No Legal Way Out”).\",\"PeriodicalId\":45757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"163 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3928\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

学者和法官将加拿大刑法中对胁迫的辩护描述为“复杂的混乱”，“常常令人困惑，可能带有性别色彩”，“非理性、反常、反常、不合逻辑，根本上是错误的”。加拿大最高法院最近的一个案件试图澄清陷入困境的胁迫辩护，R v Ryan(“Ryan”)，这是Nadia Verrelli和Lori Chambers的《无法律出路:R v Ryan，家庭虐待和胁迫辩护》(“无法律出路”)的重点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress by Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers

The defence of duress in Canadian criminal law has been described by scholars and judges as a “complicated mess,” “[o]ften confusing and potentially gendered,” and “irrational, anomalous, perverse, illogical and fundamentally wrong.” The most recent Supreme Court of Canada case to attempt to bring clarity to the embattled duress defence, R v Ryan (“Ryan”), is the focus of Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers’ No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress (“No Legal Way Out”).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL LAW-

自引率

14.30%

发文量