{"title":"双重银行体系下管理绩效对风险承担行为的影响:一项跨国分析","authors":"Faaza Fakhrunnas, Katiya Nahda","doi":"10.21511/bbs.18(4).2023.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an era defined by global economic uncertainty, the role of management performance in influencing bank risk-taking has become pivotal. This urgency stems from the evolving dynamics of the banking sector and the need for robust risk management strategies. This study investigates the relationship between management performance and banks’ risk-taking behavior, drawing data from 248 banks across eight countries comprising Indonesia, Malaysia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates spanning 2013–2021 using panel data analysis. The study reveals that management performance measured by a cost-to-income ratio (β = –0.44, p < 0.01) has a negative and significant relationship with bank risk-taking behavior. In essence, a bank with superior management performance, indicated by a lower cost-to-income ratio, tends to have greater financial stability, as evidenced by a higher Z-score. Notably, external factors like the financial crisis and institutional development as moderating variables do not significantly alter the relationship between management performance and banks’ risk-taking behavior. The study also discovers that Islamic banks (β = 0.31, p < 0.01) outperform their conventional counterparts in risk management and management performance. However, it is worth noting that the results of regional analysis demonstrate variations across the Southeast, South, and Middle East regions. After conducting several robustness check tests, the findings of this study remain consistent, offering valuable implications for both policymakers and bank management. These insights emphasize the importance of formulating appropriate regulations and frameworks to enhance management performance at the banking level. AcknowledgmentThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support from Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (DPPM) Universitas Islam Indonesia No: 006/Dir/DPPM/70/Pen.Unggulan/III/2023 for providing a research grant to this study.","PeriodicalId":53480,"journal":{"name":"Banks and Bank Systems","volume":"50 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of management performance on risk-taking behavior in a dual banking system: A cross-country analysis\",\"authors\":\"Faaza Fakhrunnas, Katiya Nahda\",\"doi\":\"10.21511/bbs.18(4).2023.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an era defined by global economic uncertainty, the role of management performance in influencing bank risk-taking has become pivotal. This urgency stems from the evolving dynamics of the banking sector and the need for robust risk management strategies. This study investigates the relationship between management performance and banks’ risk-taking behavior, drawing data from 248 banks across eight countries comprising Indonesia, Malaysia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates spanning 2013–2021 using panel data analysis. The study reveals that management performance measured by a cost-to-income ratio (β = –0.44, p < 0.01) has a negative and significant relationship with bank risk-taking behavior. In essence, a bank with superior management performance, indicated by a lower cost-to-income ratio, tends to have greater financial stability, as evidenced by a higher Z-score. Notably, external factors like the financial crisis and institutional development as moderating variables do not significantly alter the relationship between management performance and banks’ risk-taking behavior. The study also discovers that Islamic banks (β = 0.31, p < 0.01) outperform their conventional counterparts in risk management and management performance. However, it is worth noting that the results of regional analysis demonstrate variations across the Southeast, South, and Middle East regions. After conducting several robustness check tests, the findings of this study remain consistent, offering valuable implications for both policymakers and bank management. These insights emphasize the importance of formulating appropriate regulations and frameworks to enhance management performance at the banking level. AcknowledgmentThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support from Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (DPPM) Universitas Islam Indonesia No: 006/Dir/DPPM/70/Pen.Unggulan/III/2023 for providing a research grant to this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Banks and Bank Systems\",\"volume\":\"50 15\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Banks and Bank Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.18(4).2023.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banks and Bank Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.18(4).2023.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在一个以全球经济不确定性为特征的时代,管理绩效在影响银行风险承担方面的作用已变得至关重要。这种紧迫性源于银行业不断变化的动态以及对强有力的风险管理战略的需求。本研究利用面板数据分析方法,从2013-2021年印度尼西亚、马来西亚、孟加拉国、巴基斯坦、沙特阿拉伯、阿曼、巴林和阿拉伯联合酋长国等8个国家的248家银行获取数据,调查了管理绩效与银行冒险行为之间的关系。研究表明,用成本收入比(β = -0.44, p <0.01)与银行风险承担行为呈显著负相关。从本质上讲,成本收入比越低的管理绩效越好的银行,其财务稳定性也越高,Z-score也越高。值得注意的是,金融危机和制度发展等外部因素作为调节变量并没有显著改变管理绩效与银行风险承担行为之间的关系。研究还发现,伊斯兰银行(β = 0.31, p <0.01)在风险管理和管理绩效方面优于传统同行。然而,值得注意的是,区域分析的结果显示了东南部、南部和中东地区的差异。在进行了几次稳健性检验后,本研究的结果保持一致,为政策制定者和银行管理层提供了有价值的启示。这些见解强调了制定适当的法规和框架以提高银行管理绩效的重要性。作者感谢印度尼西亚伊斯兰大学Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (DPPM)主任的支持,编号:006/Dir/DPPM/70/Pen。Unggulan/III/2023为本研究提供研究经费。
The impact of management performance on risk-taking behavior in a dual banking system: A cross-country analysis
In an era defined by global economic uncertainty, the role of management performance in influencing bank risk-taking has become pivotal. This urgency stems from the evolving dynamics of the banking sector and the need for robust risk management strategies. This study investigates the relationship between management performance and banks’ risk-taking behavior, drawing data from 248 banks across eight countries comprising Indonesia, Malaysia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates spanning 2013–2021 using panel data analysis. The study reveals that management performance measured by a cost-to-income ratio (β = –0.44, p &lt; 0.01) has a negative and significant relationship with bank risk-taking behavior. In essence, a bank with superior management performance, indicated by a lower cost-to-income ratio, tends to have greater financial stability, as evidenced by a higher Z-score. Notably, external factors like the financial crisis and institutional development as moderating variables do not significantly alter the relationship between management performance and banks’ risk-taking behavior. The study also discovers that Islamic banks (β = 0.31, p &lt; 0.01) outperform their conventional counterparts in risk management and management performance. However, it is worth noting that the results of regional analysis demonstrate variations across the Southeast, South, and Middle East regions. After conducting several robustness check tests, the findings of this study remain consistent, offering valuable implications for both policymakers and bank management. These insights emphasize the importance of formulating appropriate regulations and frameworks to enhance management performance at the banking level. AcknowledgmentThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support from Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (DPPM) Universitas Islam Indonesia No: 006/Dir/DPPM/70/Pen.Unggulan/III/2023 for providing a research grant to this study.
期刊介绍:
The journal focuses on the results of scientific researches on monetary policy issues in different countries and regions all over the world. It also analyzes the activities of international financial organizations, central banks, and bank institutions. Key topics: -Monetary Policy in Different Countries and Regions; -Monetary and Payment Systems; -International Financial Organizations and Institutions; -Monetary Policy of Central Banks; -Organizational Structure, Functions and Activities of Central Banks; -State Policy and Regulation of Banking; -Bank Competitiveness; -Banks at the Financial Markets; -Bank Associations and Conglomerates; -International Payment Systems; -Investment Banking; -Financial Risks and Risk Management in Banks; -Capital and Ownership Structure, Bankruptcy and Liquidation, Mergers and Acquisitions of Banks; -Corporate Governance and Goodwill; -Personnel Management in Banks; -Econometric, Statistical Methods; Econometric Modeling of Bank Activities; -Bank Ratings.