中国老年糖尿病患者抑郁和焦虑症状的网络分析

Yajuan Zhang, Yi Cui, Yijun Li, Hongliang Lu, He Huang, Jiaru Sui, Zhihua Guo, Danmin Miao
{"title":"中国老年糖尿病患者抑郁和焦虑症状的网络分析","authors":"Yajuan Zhang, Yi Cui, Yijun Li, Hongliang Lu, He Huang, Jiaru Sui, Zhihua Guo, Danmin Miao","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2712115/v2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The move away from investigating mental disorders as whole using sum scores to the analysis of symptom-level interactions using network analysis has provided new insights into comorbidity.The current study explored the dynamic interactions between depressive and anxiety symptoms in older Chinese adults with diabetes mellitus (DM) and identified central and bridge symptoms in the depression-anxiety network to provide targets for prevention and intervention into depression and anxiety. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional design with data from the 2017–2018 wave of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). A regularized partial correlation network for depression and anxiety was estimated based on self-reported scales completed by 1685 older adults with DM aged 65 years or older. Expected influence (EI) and bridge expected influence(BEI) indices were calculated for each symptom. Results: The prevalences of depression and anxiety in our sample were 52.9% and 12.8%, respectively. The comorbidity rate of depression and anxiety was 11.5%. The six edges with the strongest regularized partial correlations were between symptoms from the same disorder. “Feeling blue/depressed”, “Nervousness or anxiety”, “Uncontrollable worry”, “Trouble relaxing”, and “Worry too much” had the highest EI values. “Nervousness or anxiety” and “Everything was an effort” exhibited the highest BEI values. Conclusion: Central and bridge symptoms were highlighted in this study. Targeting these symptoms may be effective in preventing the comorbidity of depressive and anxiety symptoms and facilitate interventions in older Chinese adults with DM who are at risk for or suffer from depressive and anxiety symptoms.","PeriodicalId":500086,"journal":{"name":"Research Square (Research Square)","volume":"54 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network analysis of depressive and anxiety symptoms in older Chinese adults with diabetes mellitus\",\"authors\":\"Yajuan Zhang, Yi Cui, Yijun Li, Hongliang Lu, He Huang, Jiaru Sui, Zhihua Guo, Danmin Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2712115/v2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: The move away from investigating mental disorders as whole using sum scores to the analysis of symptom-level interactions using network analysis has provided new insights into comorbidity.The current study explored the dynamic interactions between depressive and anxiety symptoms in older Chinese adults with diabetes mellitus (DM) and identified central and bridge symptoms in the depression-anxiety network to provide targets for prevention and intervention into depression and anxiety. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional design with data from the 2017–2018 wave of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). A regularized partial correlation network for depression and anxiety was estimated based on self-reported scales completed by 1685 older adults with DM aged 65 years or older. Expected influence (EI) and bridge expected influence(BEI) indices were calculated for each symptom. Results: The prevalences of depression and anxiety in our sample were 52.9% and 12.8%, respectively. The comorbidity rate of depression and anxiety was 11.5%. The six edges with the strongest regularized partial correlations were between symptoms from the same disorder. “Feeling blue/depressed”, “Nervousness or anxiety”, “Uncontrollable worry”, “Trouble relaxing”, and “Worry too much” had the highest EI values. “Nervousness or anxiety” and “Everything was an effort” exhibited the highest BEI values. Conclusion: Central and bridge symptoms were highlighted in this study. Targeting these symptoms may be effective in preventing the comorbidity of depressive and anxiety symptoms and facilitate interventions in older Chinese adults with DM who are at risk for or suffer from depressive and anxiety symptoms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":500086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Square (Research Square)\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Square (Research Square)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2712115/v2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square (Research Square)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2712115/v2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:从使用总和得分作为整体调查精神障碍到使用网络分析来分析症状水平的相互作用,这为共病提供了新的见解。本研究旨在探讨中国老年糖尿病患者抑郁和焦虑症状之间的动态相互作用,确定抑郁-焦虑网络的中心和桥梁症状,为预防和干预抑郁和焦虑提供靶点。方法:本研究采用横断面设计,数据来自2017-2018年中国纵向健康寿命调查(CLHLS)。根据1685名年龄在65岁或以上的老年糖尿病患者完成的自我报告量表,估计抑郁和焦虑的正则化部分相关网络。计算每个症状的预期影响指数(EI)和桥梁预期影响指数(BEI)。结果:我们的样本中抑郁和焦虑的患病率分别为52.9%和12.8%。抑郁、焦虑合并率为11.5%。具有最强正则化部分相关性的六个边是同一疾病的症状之间的边。“情绪低落”、“紧张或焦虑”、“无法控制的担忧”、“难以放松”和“过度担忧”的EI值最高。“紧张或焦虑”和“一切都是努力”表现出最高的BEI值。结论:本研究强调中枢和桥症状。针对这些症状可能有效地预防抑郁和焦虑症状的共病,并促进对有抑郁和焦虑症状风险或患有抑郁和焦虑症状的中国老年糖尿病患者的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network analysis of depressive and anxiety symptoms in older Chinese adults with diabetes mellitus
Abstract Background: The move away from investigating mental disorders as whole using sum scores to the analysis of symptom-level interactions using network analysis has provided new insights into comorbidity.The current study explored the dynamic interactions between depressive and anxiety symptoms in older Chinese adults with diabetes mellitus (DM) and identified central and bridge symptoms in the depression-anxiety network to provide targets for prevention and intervention into depression and anxiety. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional design with data from the 2017–2018 wave of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). A regularized partial correlation network for depression and anxiety was estimated based on self-reported scales completed by 1685 older adults with DM aged 65 years or older. Expected influence (EI) and bridge expected influence(BEI) indices were calculated for each symptom. Results: The prevalences of depression and anxiety in our sample were 52.9% and 12.8%, respectively. The comorbidity rate of depression and anxiety was 11.5%. The six edges with the strongest regularized partial correlations were between symptoms from the same disorder. “Feeling blue/depressed”, “Nervousness or anxiety”, “Uncontrollable worry”, “Trouble relaxing”, and “Worry too much” had the highest EI values. “Nervousness or anxiety” and “Everything was an effort” exhibited the highest BEI values. Conclusion: Central and bridge symptoms were highlighted in this study. Targeting these symptoms may be effective in preventing the comorbidity of depressive and anxiety symptoms and facilitate interventions in older Chinese adults with DM who are at risk for or suffer from depressive and anxiety symptoms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信