{"title":"重新定义低成就高中生的自主:台湾课堂的合作学习","authors":"Thi-Gam Phan, Wei-Yu Liu","doi":"10.1080/00220671.2023.2278767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe study endorses the idea of interdependence as a trait of autonomy, which dignifies low-achieving students’ autonomy developed in English-language classrooms. A modified autonomy scale, adapted from Nunan’s five levels of autonomy development, monitored low-achieving learners’ autonomy. This action research explores the pedagogical design of collaborative learning to improve low-achieving students’ autonomy. Twenty low-achieving students (out of 29) as target participants come from a vocational high school in Hualien County, Taiwan. The result via observation and group-focus interviews displayed that the quality of intra-group interactions, deciding whether target participants’ need was satisfied, influences target participants’ tendency to be autonomous. In this study, leader-assigned groups where target participants could access available ‘resources’ (leaders) without exposing themselves to teachers to complete their individual/collective goals could produce those interactions. This indicates their greater responsibility for their learning. This study could provide an inspiring perspective for practitioners to redefine autonomy in low-achieving students.Keywords: Learner autonomyinterdependencecollaborative learninglow-achieving studentsenglish learning Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Data availability statementThe authors will make transcripts available upon request (please contact the corresponding author). To protect students’ anonymity, the authors will not make available video recordings or observation data.Additional informationFundingNo agency, grants, or funding supported this research.","PeriodicalId":48163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redefining autonomy in low-achieving high-school students: Collaborative learning in Taiwan-context classrooms\",\"authors\":\"Thi-Gam Phan, Wei-Yu Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220671.2023.2278767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe study endorses the idea of interdependence as a trait of autonomy, which dignifies low-achieving students’ autonomy developed in English-language classrooms. A modified autonomy scale, adapted from Nunan’s five levels of autonomy development, monitored low-achieving learners’ autonomy. This action research explores the pedagogical design of collaborative learning to improve low-achieving students’ autonomy. Twenty low-achieving students (out of 29) as target participants come from a vocational high school in Hualien County, Taiwan. The result via observation and group-focus interviews displayed that the quality of intra-group interactions, deciding whether target participants’ need was satisfied, influences target participants’ tendency to be autonomous. In this study, leader-assigned groups where target participants could access available ‘resources’ (leaders) without exposing themselves to teachers to complete their individual/collective goals could produce those interactions. This indicates their greater responsibility for their learning. This study could provide an inspiring perspective for practitioners to redefine autonomy in low-achieving students.Keywords: Learner autonomyinterdependencecollaborative learninglow-achieving studentsenglish learning Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Data availability statementThe authors will make transcripts available upon request (please contact the corresponding author). To protect students’ anonymity, the authors will not make available video recordings or observation data.Additional informationFundingNo agency, grants, or funding supported this research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2023.2278767\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2023.2278767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Redefining autonomy in low-achieving high-school students: Collaborative learning in Taiwan-context classrooms
AbstractThe study endorses the idea of interdependence as a trait of autonomy, which dignifies low-achieving students’ autonomy developed in English-language classrooms. A modified autonomy scale, adapted from Nunan’s five levels of autonomy development, monitored low-achieving learners’ autonomy. This action research explores the pedagogical design of collaborative learning to improve low-achieving students’ autonomy. Twenty low-achieving students (out of 29) as target participants come from a vocational high school in Hualien County, Taiwan. The result via observation and group-focus interviews displayed that the quality of intra-group interactions, deciding whether target participants’ need was satisfied, influences target participants’ tendency to be autonomous. In this study, leader-assigned groups where target participants could access available ‘resources’ (leaders) without exposing themselves to teachers to complete their individual/collective goals could produce those interactions. This indicates their greater responsibility for their learning. This study could provide an inspiring perspective for practitioners to redefine autonomy in low-achieving students.Keywords: Learner autonomyinterdependencecollaborative learninglow-achieving studentsenglish learning Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Data availability statementThe authors will make transcripts available upon request (please contact the corresponding author). To protect students’ anonymity, the authors will not make available video recordings or observation data.Additional informationFundingNo agency, grants, or funding supported this research.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Educational Research is a well-known and respected periodical that reaches an international audience of educators and others concerned with cutting-edge theories and proposals. For more than 100 years, the journal has contributed to the advancement of educational practice in elementary and secondary schools by judicious study of the latest trends, examination of new procedures, evaluation of traditional practices, and replication of previous research for validation. The journal is an invaluable resource for teachers, counselors, supervisors, administrators, curriculum planners, and educational researchers as they consider the structure of tomorrow''s curricula. Special issues examine major education issues in depth. Topics of recent themes include methodology, motivation, and literacy. The Journal of Educational Research publishes manuscripts that describe or synthesize research of direct relevance to educational practice in elementary and secondary schools, pre-K–12. Special consideration is given to articles that focus on variables that can be manipulated in educational settings. Although the JER does not publish validation studies, the Editors welcome many varieties of research--experiments, evaluations, ethnographies, narrative research, replications, and so forth.