Priscilla Rupali, Hanna Alexander, Divya Deodhar, Jane Miracline, NaveenaGracelin Princy Zaccheus, Mahasampath Gowri, KishoreKumar Pichamuthu, Sowmya Sathyendra, Ramya Iyadurai, DevasahayamJesudas Christopher, D Pavithra
{"title":"在COVID-19大流行期间实施基于药剂师驱动的基于生物标志物的远程交付抗微生物药物管理战略","authors":"Priscilla Rupali, Hanna Alexander, Divya Deodhar, Jane Miracline, NaveenaGracelin Princy Zaccheus, Mahasampath Gowri, KishoreKumar Pichamuthu, Sowmya Sathyendra, Ramya Iyadurai, DevasahayamJesudas Christopher, D Pavithra","doi":"10.4103/cmi.cmi_67_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The in-person postprescription review-based antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program was disrupted in acute care settings due to the implementation of rigorous infection control measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study assessed the feasibility of a pharmacist and biomarker-driven remote AMS strategy in COVID-19 inpatients of a hospital providing tertiary-level care in southern India. Methodology: During baseline phase, patients on antibiotics >48 h were screened and antimicrobial consumption indices such as days of therapy per 1000 patient days (days on therapy [DOT]/1000PD) and length of therapy (LOT) were measured. In the intervention phase, at 48 h of antimicrobial use, procalcitonin test (PCT) was sent. Based on the PCT levels and patient's clinical condition, an electronic alert was sent to the treating team to continue/de-escalate or discontinue an antibiotic. Results: During the preintervention phase, which lasted from July to October 2020, a total of 481 patients were enrolled, whereas in the intervention phase, which ran from December 2020 to March 2021, only 90 patients were enrolled. The total DOT/1000 patient days were 9269 in the baseline and 2032 in the intervention (78% reduction). There was a significant decrease in the total length of stay (LOT) from 3779 during the preintervention phase to 657 during the intervention phase. The treating team accepted 91.1% of the recommendations provided during the intervention phase. Conclusion: A simple innovative strategy helped curb indiscriminate antibiotic use when access to patients was limited during the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":72734,"journal":{"name":"Current medical issues","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a pharmacist-driven biomarker-based remotely delivered antimicrobial stewardship strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Priscilla Rupali, Hanna Alexander, Divya Deodhar, Jane Miracline, NaveenaGracelin Princy Zaccheus, Mahasampath Gowri, KishoreKumar Pichamuthu, Sowmya Sathyendra, Ramya Iyadurai, DevasahayamJesudas Christopher, D Pavithra\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/cmi.cmi_67_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The in-person postprescription review-based antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program was disrupted in acute care settings due to the implementation of rigorous infection control measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study assessed the feasibility of a pharmacist and biomarker-driven remote AMS strategy in COVID-19 inpatients of a hospital providing tertiary-level care in southern India. Methodology: During baseline phase, patients on antibiotics >48 h were screened and antimicrobial consumption indices such as days of therapy per 1000 patient days (days on therapy [DOT]/1000PD) and length of therapy (LOT) were measured. In the intervention phase, at 48 h of antimicrobial use, procalcitonin test (PCT) was sent. Based on the PCT levels and patient's clinical condition, an electronic alert was sent to the treating team to continue/de-escalate or discontinue an antibiotic. Results: During the preintervention phase, which lasted from July to October 2020, a total of 481 patients were enrolled, whereas in the intervention phase, which ran from December 2020 to March 2021, only 90 patients were enrolled. The total DOT/1000 patient days were 9269 in the baseline and 2032 in the intervention (78% reduction). There was a significant decrease in the total length of stay (LOT) from 3779 during the preintervention phase to 657 during the intervention phase. The treating team accepted 91.1% of the recommendations provided during the intervention phase. Conclusion: A simple innovative strategy helped curb indiscriminate antibiotic use when access to patients was limited during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current medical issues\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current medical issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/cmi.cmi_67_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current medical issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cmi.cmi_67_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of a pharmacist-driven biomarker-based remotely delivered antimicrobial stewardship strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic
Background: The in-person postprescription review-based antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program was disrupted in acute care settings due to the implementation of rigorous infection control measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study assessed the feasibility of a pharmacist and biomarker-driven remote AMS strategy in COVID-19 inpatients of a hospital providing tertiary-level care in southern India. Methodology: During baseline phase, patients on antibiotics >48 h were screened and antimicrobial consumption indices such as days of therapy per 1000 patient days (days on therapy [DOT]/1000PD) and length of therapy (LOT) were measured. In the intervention phase, at 48 h of antimicrobial use, procalcitonin test (PCT) was sent. Based on the PCT levels and patient's clinical condition, an electronic alert was sent to the treating team to continue/de-escalate or discontinue an antibiotic. Results: During the preintervention phase, which lasted from July to October 2020, a total of 481 patients were enrolled, whereas in the intervention phase, which ran from December 2020 to March 2021, only 90 patients were enrolled. The total DOT/1000 patient days were 9269 in the baseline and 2032 in the intervention (78% reduction). There was a significant decrease in the total length of stay (LOT) from 3779 during the preintervention phase to 657 during the intervention phase. The treating team accepted 91.1% of the recommendations provided during the intervention phase. Conclusion: A simple innovative strategy helped curb indiscriminate antibiotic use when access to patients was limited during the COVID-19 pandemic.