基于转诊的医疗保健系统中垂直整合的影响

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Xuejing Cao , Sampath Rajagopalan , Chunyang Tong
{"title":"基于转诊的医疗保健系统中垂直整合的影响","authors":"Xuejing Cao ,&nbsp;Sampath Rajagopalan ,&nbsp;Chunyang Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2023.102998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vertical integration has been growing steadily in healthcare and several studies have explored the impact of this phenomenon on prices, consumers, etc. In this work, motivated by changes in healthcare systems in China, we provide an operational perspective by investigating how vertical integration influences the referral behavior in primary care and the corresponding service provision at hospitals or specialists. We present an optimization model to explore the effect of different levels of vertical integration on generalists and specialists. We find that the healthcare system efficiency can indeed be improved with a moderate level of integration. However, when the level of integration increases beyond a certain threshold, healthcare costs may actually increase with more integration especially when generalists or primary care providers are inadequately trained and specialists are highly utilized. We find that full integration is not optimal. Moreover, aiming for a moderate level of integration is especially appropriate if the generalist’s ability to treat complex patients is limited and/or timely access to treatment is important. Our work also shows that physicians get higher payment without necessarily improving service quality when the integration level is higher. We discuss the implications of our results in the context of the Chinese healthcare system, although some insights may apply more broadly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of vertical integration in a referral-based healthcare system\",\"authors\":\"Xuejing Cao ,&nbsp;Sampath Rajagopalan ,&nbsp;Chunyang Tong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2023.102998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Vertical integration has been growing steadily in healthcare and several studies have explored the impact of this phenomenon on prices, consumers, etc. In this work, motivated by changes in healthcare systems in China, we provide an operational perspective by investigating how vertical integration influences the referral behavior in primary care and the corresponding service provision at hospitals or specialists. We present an optimization model to explore the effect of different levels of vertical integration on generalists and specialists. We find that the healthcare system efficiency can indeed be improved with a moderate level of integration. However, when the level of integration increases beyond a certain threshold, healthcare costs may actually increase with more integration especially when generalists or primary care providers are inadequately trained and specialists are highly utilized. We find that full integration is not optimal. Moreover, aiming for a moderate level of integration is especially appropriate if the generalist’s ability to treat complex patients is limited and/or timely access to treatment is important. Our work also shows that physicians get higher payment without necessarily improving service quality when the integration level is higher. We discuss the implications of our results in the context of the Chinese healthcare system, although some insights may apply more broadly.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048323001627\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048323001627","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

垂直整合在医疗保健领域稳步增长,一些研究已经探讨了这种现象对价格、消费者等的影响。在这项工作中,受中国医疗保健系统变化的激励,我们通过调查垂直整合如何影响初级保健的转诊行为以及医院或专科医生的相应服务提供,提供了一个操作视角。我们提出了一个优化模型来探讨不同水平的垂直整合对多面手和专才的影响。我们发现,适度的整合确实可以提高医疗保健系统的效率。然而,当整合程度超过一定阈值时,医疗保健成本实际上可能会随着整合程度的提高而增加,尤其是在全科医生或初级保健提供者培训不足、专家得到充分利用的情况下。我们发现完全整合并不是最优的。此外,如果通才治疗复杂病人的能力有限和/或及时获得治疗很重要,则以中等水平的整合为目标尤其合适。我们的研究还表明,当整合水平越高时,医生获得的报酬越高,而不一定提高服务质量。我们讨论了我们的结果在中国医疗保健系统背景下的含义,尽管一些见解可能适用于更广泛的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of vertical integration in a referral-based healthcare system

Vertical integration has been growing steadily in healthcare and several studies have explored the impact of this phenomenon on prices, consumers, etc. In this work, motivated by changes in healthcare systems in China, we provide an operational perspective by investigating how vertical integration influences the referral behavior in primary care and the corresponding service provision at hospitals or specialists. We present an optimization model to explore the effect of different levels of vertical integration on generalists and specialists. We find that the healthcare system efficiency can indeed be improved with a moderate level of integration. However, when the level of integration increases beyond a certain threshold, healthcare costs may actually increase with more integration especially when generalists or primary care providers are inadequately trained and specialists are highly utilized. We find that full integration is not optimal. Moreover, aiming for a moderate level of integration is especially appropriate if the generalist’s ability to treat complex patients is limited and/or timely access to treatment is important. Our work also shows that physicians get higher payment without necessarily improving service quality when the integration level is higher. We discuss the implications of our results in the context of the Chinese healthcare system, although some insights may apply more broadly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信