在一些常用的免疫测定中,治疗性单克隆抗体缺乏观察到的干扰

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Kornelia D. Galior , Paula M. Ladwig , Melissa R. Snyder , Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich , Joshua A. Bornhorst , Darci R. Block , Nikola A. Baumann , Maria Alice V. Willrich
{"title":"在一些常用的免疫测定中,治疗性单克隆抗体缺乏观察到的干扰","authors":"Kornelia D. Galior ,&nbsp;Paula M. Ladwig ,&nbsp;Melissa R. Snyder ,&nbsp;Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich ,&nbsp;Joshua A. Bornhorst ,&nbsp;Darci R. Block ,&nbsp;Nikola A. Baumann ,&nbsp;Maria Alice V. Willrich","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.110685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmabs) have been hypothesized to interfere with immunoassay measurements, although studies investigating this potential new class of interference are lacking. This study evaluated the effects of tmabs used in cancers ipilimumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), nivolumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), pembrolizumab (Merck) and autoimmune disorders adalimumab (AbbVie), infliximab (Janssen) and vedolizumab (Takeda) in common immunoassays used in the clinical laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Residual sera from 10 randomly chosen patients were split into two tubes and spiked with same volume (approximately 5 % final volume) of either saline (control) or 6 tmabs (final concentration of 100 μg/mL each). Concentrations from sixteen analytes in 19 different assays were assessed: TSH (Roche and Beckman), free thyroxine (Roche and Siemens), cortisol (Beckman), Cancer Antigens (CA): CA19-9 (Beckman), CA15-3 (Roche), CA125 (Roche), and CA27.29 (Siemens), carcinoembryonic antigen (Beckman), alpha-fetoprotein (Beckman), thyroglobulin (Beckman) and thyroglobulin antibodies (Beckman), thyroid peroxidase antibody (Beckman), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (Roche and Beckman), total prostate-specific antigen (Roche), parathyroid hormone (Roche) and antinuclear antibodies IgG (Werfen). The tmab spiked residual sera were compared with matched saline spiked sera and percent error was assessed against allowable total error defined from biological variation or CLIA limits.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>None of the tested immunoassays were affected by the presence of the tmabs, in samples within or outside assay reference intervals. The median % error among all immunoassays ranged between −2.0% (for TSH) to 2.7% (for TPO Ab assay).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings demonstrate no detectable tmab interference for the assessed immunoassays using spiked preparations of the tmabs in residual human sera. The findings are limited to the tmabs and immunoassays studied here.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lack of observed interference by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in select commonly utilized immunoassays\",\"authors\":\"Kornelia D. Galior ,&nbsp;Paula M. Ladwig ,&nbsp;Melissa R. Snyder ,&nbsp;Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich ,&nbsp;Joshua A. Bornhorst ,&nbsp;Darci R. Block ,&nbsp;Nikola A. Baumann ,&nbsp;Maria Alice V. Willrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.110685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmabs) have been hypothesized to interfere with immunoassay measurements, although studies investigating this potential new class of interference are lacking. This study evaluated the effects of tmabs used in cancers ipilimumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), nivolumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), pembrolizumab (Merck) and autoimmune disorders adalimumab (AbbVie), infliximab (Janssen) and vedolizumab (Takeda) in common immunoassays used in the clinical laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Residual sera from 10 randomly chosen patients were split into two tubes and spiked with same volume (approximately 5 % final volume) of either saline (control) or 6 tmabs (final concentration of 100 μg/mL each). Concentrations from sixteen analytes in 19 different assays were assessed: TSH (Roche and Beckman), free thyroxine (Roche and Siemens), cortisol (Beckman), Cancer Antigens (CA): CA19-9 (Beckman), CA15-3 (Roche), CA125 (Roche), and CA27.29 (Siemens), carcinoembryonic antigen (Beckman), alpha-fetoprotein (Beckman), thyroglobulin (Beckman) and thyroglobulin antibodies (Beckman), thyroid peroxidase antibody (Beckman), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (Roche and Beckman), total prostate-specific antigen (Roche), parathyroid hormone (Roche) and antinuclear antibodies IgG (Werfen). The tmab spiked residual sera were compared with matched saline spiked sera and percent error was assessed against allowable total error defined from biological variation or CLIA limits.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>None of the tested immunoassays were affected by the presence of the tmabs, in samples within or outside assay reference intervals. The median % error among all immunoassays ranged between −2.0% (for TSH) to 2.7% (for TPO Ab assay).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings demonstrate no detectable tmab interference for the assessed immunoassays using spiked preparations of the tmabs in residual human sera. The findings are limited to the tmabs and immunoassays studied here.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical biochemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912023002138\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912023002138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗性单克隆抗体(tmab)被假设会干扰免疫分析测量,尽管缺乏对这种潜在的新型干扰的研究。本研究评估了用于癌症的单克隆抗体(ipilimumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), nivolumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), pembrolizumab (Merck)和自身免疫性疾病的阿达木单抗(AbbVie),英夫利昔单抗(Janssen)和vedolizumab(武田)在临床实验室常用的免疫测定中的作用。方法随机抽取10例患者的残余血清,分成两管,分别加入等量(约5%终体积)的生理盐水(对照)或6个单抗(终浓度各为100 μg/mL)。对19种不同检测方法中16种分析物的浓度进行了评估:TSH (Roche和Beckman)、游离甲状腺素(Roche和Siemens)、皮质醇(Beckman)、癌症抗原(CA):CA19-9 (Beckman)、CA15-3 (Roche)、CA125 (Roche)和CA27.29 (Siemens)、癌胚抗原(Beckman)、甲胎蛋白(Beckman)、甲状腺球蛋白(Beckman)和甲状腺球蛋白抗体(Beckman)、甲状腺过氧化物酶抗体(Beckman)、β -人绒毛膜促性腺激素(Roche和Beckman)、前列腺总特异性抗原(Roche)、甲状旁腺激素(Roche)和抗核抗体IgG (Werfen)。将tmab加标残余血清与匹配的生理盐水加标血清进行比较,并根据生物变异或CLIA限值定义的允许总误差评估百分比误差。结果在检测参考区间内或外的样品中,均不受单克隆抗体存在的影响。所有免疫测定的中位误差在- 2.0% (TSH)至2.7% (TPO Ab测定)之间。结论这些发现表明,在剩余的人血清中使用加标的单克隆抗体制剂,所评估的免疫分析没有检测到单克隆抗体的干扰。这些发现仅限于这里研究的单克隆抗体和免疫测定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lack of observed interference by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in select commonly utilized immunoassays

Background

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmabs) have been hypothesized to interfere with immunoassay measurements, although studies investigating this potential new class of interference are lacking. This study evaluated the effects of tmabs used in cancers ipilimumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), nivolumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), pembrolizumab (Merck) and autoimmune disorders adalimumab (AbbVie), infliximab (Janssen) and vedolizumab (Takeda) in common immunoassays used in the clinical laboratory.

Methods

Residual sera from 10 randomly chosen patients were split into two tubes and spiked with same volume (approximately 5 % final volume) of either saline (control) or 6 tmabs (final concentration of 100 μg/mL each). Concentrations from sixteen analytes in 19 different assays were assessed: TSH (Roche and Beckman), free thyroxine (Roche and Siemens), cortisol (Beckman), Cancer Antigens (CA): CA19-9 (Beckman), CA15-3 (Roche), CA125 (Roche), and CA27.29 (Siemens), carcinoembryonic antigen (Beckman), alpha-fetoprotein (Beckman), thyroglobulin (Beckman) and thyroglobulin antibodies (Beckman), thyroid peroxidase antibody (Beckman), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (Roche and Beckman), total prostate-specific antigen (Roche), parathyroid hormone (Roche) and antinuclear antibodies IgG (Werfen). The tmab spiked residual sera were compared with matched saline spiked sera and percent error was assessed against allowable total error defined from biological variation or CLIA limits.

Results

None of the tested immunoassays were affected by the presence of the tmabs, in samples within or outside assay reference intervals. The median % error among all immunoassays ranged between −2.0% (for TSH) to 2.7% (for TPO Ab assay).

Conclusion

These findings demonstrate no detectable tmab interference for the assessed immunoassays using spiked preparations of the tmabs in residual human sera. The findings are limited to the tmabs and immunoassays studied here.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信