使用固定刺激次数的神经电刺激,同时改变频率和占空比,研究大鱼际肌肉的疲劳

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
A. Gkesou , A. Papavasileiou , S. Karagiaridis , T. Kannas , I.G. Amiridis , V. Hatzitaki , D.A. Patikas
{"title":"使用固定刺激次数的神经电刺激,同时改变频率和占空比,研究大鱼际肌肉的疲劳","authors":"A. Gkesou ,&nbsp;A. Papavasileiou ,&nbsp;S. Karagiaridis ,&nbsp;T. Kannas ,&nbsp;I.G. Amiridis ,&nbsp;V. Hatzitaki ,&nbsp;D.A. Patikas","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our aim was to compare three electrical stimulation<span> protocols (P20, P30 and P40), with the same number of stimuli, but different stimulation frequencies (20, 30 and 40 Hz, respectively) and duty cycles [1.2:1.2 s (continuous), 0.8:1.2 s (intermittent) and 0.6:1.2 s (intermittent), respectively). Twitch force and the peak-to-peak M-wave amplitude of the thenar muscles were measured before, during and after each protocol at 1–40 Hz in random order. Twelve healthy adults (23–41 years old) were examined for each protocol in random order and in separate sessions. P20 elicited the highest mean force, and P40 the lowest decrease in percent force at the end of the protocol. Force evoked at 1 and 10 Hz decreased less after P40, compared with P20 and P30. The M-wave amplitude was significantly reduced throughout all protocols, with the largest decrease observed during P30. Although an increase in frequency typically induced earlier and greater decrement in force, this was compensated or even reversed by increasing the interval between each stimulation train, while keeping the number of pulses per stimulation cycle constant. The lesser decrease in M-wave amplitude during P40 compared with P20 indicates that longer between-train intervals may help maintaining the integrity of neuromuscular propagation.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigability of the thenar muscles using electrical nerve stimulation with fixed stimuli count, while varying the frequency and duty cycle\",\"authors\":\"A. Gkesou ,&nbsp;A. Papavasileiou ,&nbsp;S. Karagiaridis ,&nbsp;T. Kannas ,&nbsp;I.G. Amiridis ,&nbsp;V. Hatzitaki ,&nbsp;D.A. Patikas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Our aim was to compare three electrical stimulation<span> protocols (P20, P30 and P40), with the same number of stimuli, but different stimulation frequencies (20, 30 and 40 Hz, respectively) and duty cycles [1.2:1.2 s (continuous), 0.8:1.2 s (intermittent) and 0.6:1.2 s (intermittent), respectively). Twitch force and the peak-to-peak M-wave amplitude of the thenar muscles were measured before, during and after each protocol at 1–40 Hz in random order. Twelve healthy adults (23–41 years old) were examined for each protocol in random order and in separate sessions. P20 elicited the highest mean force, and P40 the lowest decrease in percent force at the end of the protocol. Force evoked at 1 and 10 Hz decreased less after P40, compared with P20 and P30. The M-wave amplitude was significantly reduced throughout all protocols, with the largest decrease observed during P30. Although an increase in frequency typically induced earlier and greater decrement in force, this was compensated or even reversed by increasing the interval between each stimulation train, while keeping the number of pulses per stimulation cycle constant. The lesser decrease in M-wave amplitude during P40 compared with P20 indicates that longer between-train intervals may help maintaining the integrity of neuromuscular propagation.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123000974\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123000974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是比较三种电刺激方案(P20、P30和P40),它们具有相同的刺激次数,但刺激频率(分别为20、30和40 Hz)和占空比[分别为1.2:1.2 s(连续)、0.8:1.2 s(间歇)和0.6:1.2 s(间歇)]不同。在1-40 Hz的频率下,按随机顺序测量每次治疗前、治疗中和治疗后大鱼际肌肉的抽动力和m波峰对峰振幅。12名健康成人(23-41岁)按随机顺序在单独的会议中对每个方案进行检查。实验结束时,P20的平均力最大,P40的平均力百分比下降最小。与P20和P30相比,P40后1和10 Hz诱发的力减少较少。在所有方案中,m波振幅都显著降低,在P30期间观察到最大的下降。虽然频率的增加通常会导致更早和更大的力衰减,但通过增加每个刺激序列之间的间隔,同时保持每个刺激周期的脉冲数不变,可以补偿甚至逆转这种衰减。与P20相比,P40期间m波振幅的下降幅度较小,这表明较长的训练间隔可能有助于维持神经肌肉传播的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fatigability of the thenar muscles using electrical nerve stimulation with fixed stimuli count, while varying the frequency and duty cycle

Our aim was to compare three electrical stimulation protocols (P20, P30 and P40), with the same number of stimuli, but different stimulation frequencies (20, 30 and 40 Hz, respectively) and duty cycles [1.2:1.2 s (continuous), 0.8:1.2 s (intermittent) and 0.6:1.2 s (intermittent), respectively). Twitch force and the peak-to-peak M-wave amplitude of the thenar muscles were measured before, during and after each protocol at 1–40 Hz in random order. Twelve healthy adults (23–41 years old) were examined for each protocol in random order and in separate sessions. P20 elicited the highest mean force, and P40 the lowest decrease in percent force at the end of the protocol. Force evoked at 1 and 10 Hz decreased less after P40, compared with P20 and P30. The M-wave amplitude was significantly reduced throughout all protocols, with the largest decrease observed during P30. Although an increase in frequency typically induced earlier and greater decrement in force, this was compensated or even reversed by increasing the interval between each stimulation train, while keeping the number of pulses per stimulation cycle constant. The lesser decrease in M-wave amplitude during P40 compared with P20 indicates that longer between-train intervals may help maintaining the integrity of neuromuscular propagation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques. As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信