Luis A. Vega, Myrren Agabao, Â. Franco, Zeltzin Estrada-Rodriguez, Fernando Gomez, Natasha Selene, Yeunjoo Lee, Addie Gonzales, K. Wu, Andrea S. Niestas
{"title":"超越创伤:治疗的警告、解释和文化背景","authors":"Luis A. Vega, Myrren Agabao, Â. Franco, Zeltzin Estrada-Rodriguez, Fernando Gomez, Natasha Selene, Yeunjoo Lee, Addie Gonzales, K. Wu, Andrea S. Niestas","doi":"10.33790/jrpr1100146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examined evidence for the view that trauma transcendence should be operationally defined as a process rather than an end goal and considered caveats in individual differences of construal and contextual-cultural influences. The focus was on the role of therapy treatments used in trauma transcendence and the extent to which evidence-based information, theory, and generalizability are—can/ should be—involved. Our methodological analysis and theoretical discussion of extant research evidence focused on (a) models of trauma transcendence, (b) the multivariate, scientific nature of evidence-based therapy treatments/outcomes, (c) the need to have tailor-made trauma treatments that allow for individualized patient variability, (d) therapists’ skill-limitations/strengths, and (e) the need for methodical, systematic approaches to trauma transcendence. Our conclusions show that evidence-based approaches are needed, but limits remain in generalizability of findings. We also recognize a need for multipronged approaches to trauma transcendence, from trauma-informed approaches, to reducing the shortage of therapists, increasing methodological-clinical sophistication in the public sphere, and addressing the multivariate nature of trauma. Finally, we suggest that navigating trauma transcendence should be a process that goes beyond the homeostatic state.","PeriodicalId":413567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Practices and Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcending Trauma: Treatments’ Caveats, Construal, and Cultural Context\",\"authors\":\"Luis A. Vega, Myrren Agabao, Â. Franco, Zeltzin Estrada-Rodriguez, Fernando Gomez, Natasha Selene, Yeunjoo Lee, Addie Gonzales, K. Wu, Andrea S. Niestas\",\"doi\":\"10.33790/jrpr1100146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examined evidence for the view that trauma transcendence should be operationally defined as a process rather than an end goal and considered caveats in individual differences of construal and contextual-cultural influences. The focus was on the role of therapy treatments used in trauma transcendence and the extent to which evidence-based information, theory, and generalizability are—can/ should be—involved. Our methodological analysis and theoretical discussion of extant research evidence focused on (a) models of trauma transcendence, (b) the multivariate, scientific nature of evidence-based therapy treatments/outcomes, (c) the need to have tailor-made trauma treatments that allow for individualized patient variability, (d) therapists’ skill-limitations/strengths, and (e) the need for methodical, systematic approaches to trauma transcendence. Our conclusions show that evidence-based approaches are needed, but limits remain in generalizability of findings. We also recognize a need for multipronged approaches to trauma transcendence, from trauma-informed approaches, to reducing the shortage of therapists, increasing methodological-clinical sophistication in the public sphere, and addressing the multivariate nature of trauma. Finally, we suggest that navigating trauma transcendence should be a process that goes beyond the homeostatic state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Practices and Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Practices and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33790/jrpr1100146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Practices and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33790/jrpr1100146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Transcending Trauma: Treatments’ Caveats, Construal, and Cultural Context
We examined evidence for the view that trauma transcendence should be operationally defined as a process rather than an end goal and considered caveats in individual differences of construal and contextual-cultural influences. The focus was on the role of therapy treatments used in trauma transcendence and the extent to which evidence-based information, theory, and generalizability are—can/ should be—involved. Our methodological analysis and theoretical discussion of extant research evidence focused on (a) models of trauma transcendence, (b) the multivariate, scientific nature of evidence-based therapy treatments/outcomes, (c) the need to have tailor-made trauma treatments that allow for individualized patient variability, (d) therapists’ skill-limitations/strengths, and (e) the need for methodical, systematic approaches to trauma transcendence. Our conclusions show that evidence-based approaches are needed, but limits remain in generalizability of findings. We also recognize a need for multipronged approaches to trauma transcendence, from trauma-informed approaches, to reducing the shortage of therapists, increasing methodological-clinical sophistication in the public sphere, and addressing the multivariate nature of trauma. Finally, we suggest that navigating trauma transcendence should be a process that goes beyond the homeostatic state.