基于gsn的安全案例和模式的分类

Yaping Luo, Zhuoao Li, M. Brand
{"title":"基于gsn的安全案例和模式的分类","authors":"Yaping Luo, Zhuoao Li, M. Brand","doi":"10.5220/0005734305090516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently modeling techniques are introduced to support safety assessment. Goal Structural Notation is one of these modeling techniques, which can be used to facilitate the development of safety argumentation and create reusable safety argumentation models. Consequently, GSN-based safety cases are widely used to demonstrate the safety of systems in safety-critical domains. Due to the amount of manual work, constructing a safety case is usually time-consuming. Moreover, the re-usability of GSN-based safety cases is limited. To address this, safety case patterns are introduced to support safety case reuse. As more and more GSN-based safety cases and patterns are designed with different goals in different contexts, it becomes hard to identify a reusable safety case or pattern. In this paper, we carried out a study on the categorization of existing GSN-based safety cases and patterns. As a result, a number of high cited publications are selected and studied. Finally a categorization of GSN-based safety cases is proposed. A clear categorization of GSN-based safety cases can be used to identify similar safety cases or patterns and facilitate safety case reuse.","PeriodicalId":360028,"journal":{"name":"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A categorization of GSN-based safety cases and patterns\",\"authors\":\"Yaping Luo, Zhuoao Li, M. Brand\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0005734305090516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently modeling techniques are introduced to support safety assessment. Goal Structural Notation is one of these modeling techniques, which can be used to facilitate the development of safety argumentation and create reusable safety argumentation models. Consequently, GSN-based safety cases are widely used to demonstrate the safety of systems in safety-critical domains. Due to the amount of manual work, constructing a safety case is usually time-consuming. Moreover, the re-usability of GSN-based safety cases is limited. To address this, safety case patterns are introduced to support safety case reuse. As more and more GSN-based safety cases and patterns are designed with different goals in different contexts, it becomes hard to identify a reusable safety case or pattern. In this paper, we carried out a study on the categorization of existing GSN-based safety cases and patterns. As a result, a number of high cited publications are selected and studied. Finally a categorization of GSN-based safety cases is proposed. A clear categorization of GSN-based safety cases can be used to identify similar safety cases or patterns and facilitate safety case reuse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005734305090516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005734305090516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

最近引入了建模技术来支持安全评估。目标结构表示法是这些建模技术之一,可用于促进安全论证的开发并创建可重用的安全论证模型。因此,基于gsn的安全案例被广泛用于演示安全关键领域系统的安全性。由于大量的手工工作,构建一个安全案例通常是耗时的。此外,基于gsn的安全案例的可重用性是有限的。为了解决这个问题,引入了安全用例模式来支持安全用例的重用。随着越来越多的基于gsn的安全用例和模式被设计成在不同的上下文中具有不同的目标,识别可重用的安全用例或模式变得越来越困难。本文对现有的基于gsn的安全案例和模式进行了分类研究。因此,选择了一些高被引的出版物进行研究。最后提出了基于gsn的安全案例分类方法。基于gsn的安全案例的明确分类可用于识别类似的安全案例或模式,并促进安全案例的重用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A categorization of GSN-based safety cases and patterns
Recently modeling techniques are introduced to support safety assessment. Goal Structural Notation is one of these modeling techniques, which can be used to facilitate the development of safety argumentation and create reusable safety argumentation models. Consequently, GSN-based safety cases are widely used to demonstrate the safety of systems in safety-critical domains. Due to the amount of manual work, constructing a safety case is usually time-consuming. Moreover, the re-usability of GSN-based safety cases is limited. To address this, safety case patterns are introduced to support safety case reuse. As more and more GSN-based safety cases and patterns are designed with different goals in different contexts, it becomes hard to identify a reusable safety case or pattern. In this paper, we carried out a study on the categorization of existing GSN-based safety cases and patterns. As a result, a number of high cited publications are selected and studied. Finally a categorization of GSN-based safety cases is proposed. A clear categorization of GSN-based safety cases can be used to identify similar safety cases or patterns and facilitate safety case reuse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信