{"title":"获取西格里资产以获得业主自住财产:对澳大利亚家庭和政府的影响","authors":"John R. Evans, A. Razeed","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3881415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis by Evans & Razeed (2019) showed that to achieve a reasonable standard of living in retirement, in addition to the Pillar 2 compulsory system (SGL), Australians would need to contribute during their working life to private savings, but the contribution would be significantly reduced if there was an owner-occupied property that could be partly converted to income-generating assets in retirement. Given the favourable tax and Age Pension eligibility treatment of owner-occupied property relative to other assets in Australia, the issue arises as to whether or not SGL members should be allowed to access their SGL assets to acquire owner-occupied property. This paper shows that such an arrangement would generally benefit both SGL members and the government, but there is a small possibility of negative outcomes for the government.","PeriodicalId":430314,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accessing SGL Assets for Acquisition of Owner-Occupied Property: Consequences for Australian Households and Government\",\"authors\":\"John R. Evans, A. Razeed\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3881415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Analysis by Evans & Razeed (2019) showed that to achieve a reasonable standard of living in retirement, in addition to the Pillar 2 compulsory system (SGL), Australians would need to contribute during their working life to private savings, but the contribution would be significantly reduced if there was an owner-occupied property that could be partly converted to income-generating assets in retirement. Given the favourable tax and Age Pension eligibility treatment of owner-occupied property relative to other assets in Australia, the issue arises as to whether or not SGL members should be allowed to access their SGL assets to acquire owner-occupied property. This paper shows that such an arrangement would generally benefit both SGL members and the government, but there is a small possibility of negative outcomes for the government.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3881415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3881415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accessing SGL Assets for Acquisition of Owner-Occupied Property: Consequences for Australian Households and Government
Analysis by Evans & Razeed (2019) showed that to achieve a reasonable standard of living in retirement, in addition to the Pillar 2 compulsory system (SGL), Australians would need to contribute during their working life to private savings, but the contribution would be significantly reduced if there was an owner-occupied property that could be partly converted to income-generating assets in retirement. Given the favourable tax and Age Pension eligibility treatment of owner-occupied property relative to other assets in Australia, the issue arises as to whether or not SGL members should be allowed to access their SGL assets to acquire owner-occupied property. This paper shows that such an arrangement would generally benefit both SGL members and the government, but there is a small possibility of negative outcomes for the government.