受祝福的军队:安达卢斯的圣战和记忆(10 - 13世纪)

Alejandro García-Sanjuán
{"title":"受祝福的军队:安达卢斯的圣战和记忆(10 - 13世纪)","authors":"Alejandro García-Sanjuán","doi":"10.1080/09503110.2022.2083776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tation, it should come as no surprise that this is a book for specialists who will already be familiar with the contours of Orosian scholarship. Leonard, and Humphries in his foreword, do provide overviews of the state of the field, and many of the chapters begin with summaries of how others have interpreted aspects of theHistories. However, undergraduate students in particular might find it useful to pick up this work after first reading through gentler introductions to Orosius, such as that provided by Andrew Fear’s translation of the Histories or the relevant entry in the Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity. Notwithstanding these minor issues, In Defiance of History is a nicely produced, wellwritten and welcome addition to the scholarship. Leonard fully succeeds in her aim of demonstrating why the Spanish priest should no longer be dismissed as an inferior writer. At the risk of appropriating the clergyman’s rose-tinted rhetoric, the field of Orosian studies seems to be entering into a golden age. In addition to this monograph, a major international conference, part-organised by Leonard herself, took place in May 2022 and reaffirmed the wide range of research currently being undertaken on Orosius and his outputs. Importantly, this new wave of scholarly attention is affecting not just well-established scholars and Orosian experts, but also a host of research students, whose projects promise to augment and transform the existing scholarship on this Late Antique writer. With In Defiance of History, Leonard has thrown down the gauntlet for an ambitiously systematic and wide-ranging exploration of the Histories. We must all now wait patiently, and eagerly, for this gauntlet to be picked up.","PeriodicalId":112464,"journal":{"name":"Al-Masāq","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ejércitos benditos: Yihad y memoria en al-Andalus (siglos X–XIII)\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro García-Sanjuán\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09503110.2022.2083776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"tation, it should come as no surprise that this is a book for specialists who will already be familiar with the contours of Orosian scholarship. Leonard, and Humphries in his foreword, do provide overviews of the state of the field, and many of the chapters begin with summaries of how others have interpreted aspects of theHistories. However, undergraduate students in particular might find it useful to pick up this work after first reading through gentler introductions to Orosius, such as that provided by Andrew Fear’s translation of the Histories or the relevant entry in the Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity. Notwithstanding these minor issues, In Defiance of History is a nicely produced, wellwritten and welcome addition to the scholarship. Leonard fully succeeds in her aim of demonstrating why the Spanish priest should no longer be dismissed as an inferior writer. At the risk of appropriating the clergyman’s rose-tinted rhetoric, the field of Orosian studies seems to be entering into a golden age. In addition to this monograph, a major international conference, part-organised by Leonard herself, took place in May 2022 and reaffirmed the wide range of research currently being undertaken on Orosius and his outputs. Importantly, this new wave of scholarly attention is affecting not just well-established scholars and Orosian experts, but also a host of research students, whose projects promise to augment and transform the existing scholarship on this Late Antique writer. With In Defiance of History, Leonard has thrown down the gauntlet for an ambitiously systematic and wide-ranging exploration of the Histories. We must all now wait patiently, and eagerly, for this gauntlet to be picked up.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Masāq\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Masāq\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503110.2022.2083776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Masāq","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503110.2022.2083776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

然而,这本书是为那些已经熟悉奥罗西亚学术概况的专家们所写的,这也就不足为奇了。伦纳德和汉弗莱斯在他的前言中,确实提供了该领域现状的概述,并且许多章节都以其他人如何解释历史方面的摘要开始。然而,特别是本科生可能会发现,在第一次阅读对奥罗修斯的温和介绍之后,比如安德鲁·菲尔翻译的《历史》或《牛津古词典》中的相关条目,拿起这本书是有用的。尽管存在这些小问题,《藐视历史》是一本制作精良、文笔优美、受欢迎的学术著作。伦纳德完全成功地证明了为什么西班牙牧师不应该再被视为一个劣等作家。冒着盗用牧师玫瑰色修辞的风险,奥罗斯研究领域似乎正在进入一个黄金时代。除了这本专著之外,2022年5月,伦纳德亲自组织了一次重要的国际会议,会议重申了目前对奥罗修斯及其成果进行的广泛研究。重要的是,这一新的学术关注浪潮不仅影响着知名学者和奥罗西亚专家,也影响着一大批研究生,他们的项目有望扩大和改变这位晚期古代作家的现有学术研究。在《藐视历史》一书中,伦纳德对历史进行了雄心勃勃、系统而广泛的探索。我们现在都必须耐心地、热切地等待,等待这个挑战被拾起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ejércitos benditos: Yihad y memoria en al-Andalus (siglos X–XIII)
tation, it should come as no surprise that this is a book for specialists who will already be familiar with the contours of Orosian scholarship. Leonard, and Humphries in his foreword, do provide overviews of the state of the field, and many of the chapters begin with summaries of how others have interpreted aspects of theHistories. However, undergraduate students in particular might find it useful to pick up this work after first reading through gentler introductions to Orosius, such as that provided by Andrew Fear’s translation of the Histories or the relevant entry in the Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity. Notwithstanding these minor issues, In Defiance of History is a nicely produced, wellwritten and welcome addition to the scholarship. Leonard fully succeeds in her aim of demonstrating why the Spanish priest should no longer be dismissed as an inferior writer. At the risk of appropriating the clergyman’s rose-tinted rhetoric, the field of Orosian studies seems to be entering into a golden age. In addition to this monograph, a major international conference, part-organised by Leonard herself, took place in May 2022 and reaffirmed the wide range of research currently being undertaken on Orosius and his outputs. Importantly, this new wave of scholarly attention is affecting not just well-established scholars and Orosian experts, but also a host of research students, whose projects promise to augment and transform the existing scholarship on this Late Antique writer. With In Defiance of History, Leonard has thrown down the gauntlet for an ambitiously systematic and wide-ranging exploration of the Histories. We must all now wait patiently, and eagerly, for this gauntlet to be picked up.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信