{"title":"电磁能量采集器的比较","authors":"E. Kurt","doi":"10.1109/ECAI46879.2019.9041965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares various types of electromagnetic harvesters in terms of their electrical and magnetic features. The harvesters have different flux morphologies and natural frequencies and therefore that can be a superiority for them to use in different applications from the ignition signal to the energy harvester aims for battery-free systems. It will be pointed out that the systems considered here have the power ranges of P = 14 mW and P = 32 µW for the optimal frequency regimes.","PeriodicalId":285780,"journal":{"name":"2019 11th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Electromagnetic Energy Harvesters\",\"authors\":\"E. Kurt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECAI46879.2019.9041965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares various types of electromagnetic harvesters in terms of their electrical and magnetic features. The harvesters have different flux morphologies and natural frequencies and therefore that can be a superiority for them to use in different applications from the ignition signal to the energy harvester aims for battery-free systems. It will be pointed out that the systems considered here have the power ranges of P = 14 mW and P = 32 µW for the optimal frequency regimes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 11th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI)\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 11th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECAI46879.2019.9041965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 11th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECAI46879.2019.9041965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper compares various types of electromagnetic harvesters in terms of their electrical and magnetic features. The harvesters have different flux morphologies and natural frequencies and therefore that can be a superiority for them to use in different applications from the ignition signal to the energy harvester aims for battery-free systems. It will be pointed out that the systems considered here have the power ranges of P = 14 mW and P = 32 µW for the optimal frequency regimes.