一个关于飓风、出口和澳大利亚受保护香蕉产业放弃盈余的故事

Chia Chiun Ko, P. Frijters, Gigi Foster
{"title":"一个关于飓风、出口和澳大利亚受保护香蕉产业放弃盈余的故事","authors":"Chia Chiun Ko, P. Frijters, Gigi Foster","doi":"10.1111/1475-4932.12414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the welfare loss caused by import restrictions on bananas in Australia, which we argue to be a classic rent‐seeking policy. We propose a new micro‐model of agricultural production under uncertainty and production delays and ask whether, due to cyclones and the timing of planting decisions, Australian banana import restrictions have turned into a form of export promotion. We exploit two cyclones as exogenous supply shocks, and use new data to estimate the price elasticity of demand for bananas in Australia to be around −0.5. We estimate the total welfare loss of Australia's banana import restrictions to be over A$150 million per year, implying a yearly subsidy of more than a quarter of a million dollars per banana grower.","PeriodicalId":346063,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Record","volume":"507 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Tale of Cyclones, Exports and Surplus Forgone in Australia's Protected Banana Industry\",\"authors\":\"Chia Chiun Ko, P. Frijters, Gigi Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-4932.12414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the welfare loss caused by import restrictions on bananas in Australia, which we argue to be a classic rent‐seeking policy. We propose a new micro‐model of agricultural production under uncertainty and production delays and ask whether, due to cyclones and the timing of planting decisions, Australian banana import restrictions have turned into a form of export promotion. We exploit two cyclones as exogenous supply shocks, and use new data to estimate the price elasticity of demand for bananas in Australia to be around −0.5. We estimate the total welfare loss of Australia's banana import restrictions to be over A$150 million per year, implying a yearly subsidy of more than a quarter of a million dollars per banana grower.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Record\",\"volume\":\"507 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文研究了澳大利亚香蕉进口限制造成的福利损失,我们认为这是一种典型的寻租政策。我们提出了一个新的农业生产不确定性和生产延迟的微观模型,并询问由于飓风和种植决定的时间,澳大利亚香蕉进口限制是否已经变成了一种促进出口的形式。我们利用两个气旋作为外源性供应冲击,并使用新数据估计澳大利亚香蕉需求的价格弹性约为- 0.5。我们估计,澳大利亚香蕉进口限制每年造成的福利损失总额超过1.5亿澳元,这意味着每个香蕉种植者每年获得的补贴超过25万美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Tale of Cyclones, Exports and Surplus Forgone in Australia's Protected Banana Industry
This paper examines the welfare loss caused by import restrictions on bananas in Australia, which we argue to be a classic rent‐seeking policy. We propose a new micro‐model of agricultural production under uncertainty and production delays and ask whether, due to cyclones and the timing of planting decisions, Australian banana import restrictions have turned into a form of export promotion. We exploit two cyclones as exogenous supply shocks, and use new data to estimate the price elasticity of demand for bananas in Australia to be around −0.5. We estimate the total welfare loss of Australia's banana import restrictions to be over A$150 million per year, implying a yearly subsidy of more than a quarter of a million dollars per banana grower.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信