在多组件科学软件中构建粒度测试的方法

A. Dubey, Hui Wan
{"title":"在多组件科学软件中构建粒度测试的方法","authors":"A. Dubey, Hui Wan","doi":"10.1145/3194747.3194751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational science and engineering communities develop complex application software with multiple mathematical models that need to interact with one another. Partly due to complexity of verifying scientific software, and partly because of the way incentives work in science, there has been insufficient testing of these codes. With a spotlight on the results produced with scientific software, and increasing awareness of software testing and verification as a critical contributor to the reliability of these results, testing is gaining more attention by the developing teams. However, many science teams struggle to find a good solution for themselves due either to lack of training or lack of resources within the team. In this experience paper we describe test development methodologies utilized in two different scenarios: one explains a methodology for building granular tests where none existed before, while the second demonstrates a methodology for selecting test cases that build confidence in the software through a process similar to scaffolding. The common insight from both the experiences is that testing should be a part of software design from the beginning for better software and scientific productivity.","PeriodicalId":101597,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/ACM 13th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Science (SE4Science)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodology for Building Granular Testing in Multicomponent Scientific Software\",\"authors\":\"A. Dubey, Hui Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3194747.3194751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computational science and engineering communities develop complex application software with multiple mathematical models that need to interact with one another. Partly due to complexity of verifying scientific software, and partly because of the way incentives work in science, there has been insufficient testing of these codes. With a spotlight on the results produced with scientific software, and increasing awareness of software testing and verification as a critical contributor to the reliability of these results, testing is gaining more attention by the developing teams. However, many science teams struggle to find a good solution for themselves due either to lack of training or lack of resources within the team. In this experience paper we describe test development methodologies utilized in two different scenarios: one explains a methodology for building granular tests where none existed before, while the second demonstrates a methodology for selecting test cases that build confidence in the software through a process similar to scaffolding. The common insight from both the experiences is that testing should be a part of software design from the beginning for better software and scientific productivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE/ACM 13th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Science (SE4Science)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE/ACM 13th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Science (SE4Science)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3194747.3194751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/ACM 13th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Science (SE4Science)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3194747.3194751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

计算科学和工程社区开发具有多种数学模型的复杂应用软件,这些模型需要相互交互。部分原因是验证科学软件的复杂性,部分原因是激励机制在科学领域的运作方式,对这些代码的测试一直不够。随着对科学软件产生的结果的关注,以及对软件测试和验证作为这些结果可靠性的关键贡献者的认识的增加,测试正在获得开发团队的更多关注。然而,由于缺乏培训或团队内部缺乏资源,许多科学团队难以为自己找到一个好的解决方案。在这篇经验论文中,我们描述了在两种不同场景中使用的测试开发方法:一种解释了一种用于构建以前不存在的粒度测试的方法,而另一种演示了一种用于选择测试用例的方法,这些测试用例通过类似于脚手架的过程在软件中建立信心。从这两种经验中得出的共同见解是,为了更好的软件和科学的生产力,测试应该从一开始就成为软件设计的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodology for Building Granular Testing in Multicomponent Scientific Software
Computational science and engineering communities develop complex application software with multiple mathematical models that need to interact with one another. Partly due to complexity of verifying scientific software, and partly because of the way incentives work in science, there has been insufficient testing of these codes. With a spotlight on the results produced with scientific software, and increasing awareness of software testing and verification as a critical contributor to the reliability of these results, testing is gaining more attention by the developing teams. However, many science teams struggle to find a good solution for themselves due either to lack of training or lack of resources within the team. In this experience paper we describe test development methodologies utilized in two different scenarios: one explains a methodology for building granular tests where none existed before, while the second demonstrates a methodology for selecting test cases that build confidence in the software through a process similar to scaffolding. The common insight from both the experiences is that testing should be a part of software design from the beginning for better software and scientific productivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信