以顾客满意度为中介变量的网络广告对网络销售应用中消费者购买兴趣的影响(以芝加哥地区的医生和护士为例)

Mark G. Maffett, Jorge O. Brusa
{"title":"以顾客满意度为中介变量的网络广告对网络销售应用中消费者购买兴趣的影响(以芝加哥地区的医生和护士为例)","authors":"Mark G. Maffett, Jorge O. Brusa","doi":"10.59733/medalion.v3i4.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of this study show. (1) It can be seen that the value of the adjusted R square is 0.758 or 75.8%. This shows that consumer satisfaction (Y1) and advertising (X) can explain purchase intention (Y2) of 75.8%, the remaining 24.2% (100% - 75.8%) is explained by other variables outside the research model. This. Such as service, price and interest in buying. (2) The results of the (Partial) t test show that tcount (7.413) > ttable (1.685), likewise with a significance value of 0.00 <0.05, it can be concluded that the first hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the advertising variable (X) has an effect positive and significant to consumer satisfaction (Y1). (3) The results of the t test (Partial) can be seen that the value of tcount (3.059) > ttable (1.685), and the significance value is 0.00 <0.05, it can be concluded that the second hypothesis is accepted, meaning that advertising (X) has a positive and significant effect on purchase intention (Y2). (4) The results of the path analysis test show that the direct effect of variable X on variable Y2 is 0.377. While the indirect effect through the Y1 variable is 0.769 x 0.554 = 0.426, the calculation results obtained show that the indirect effect through the Y1 variable is greater than the direct effect on the Y2 variable.","PeriodicalId":448790,"journal":{"name":"MEDALION JOURNAL: Medical Research, Nursing, Health and Midwife Participation","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF ONLINE ADVERTISING ON CONSUMER BUYING INTEREST IN ONLINE SELLING APPLICATIONS WITH CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AS AN INTERVENING VARIABLE (Case Study of Medical Doctor and Nurses in Chicago)\",\"authors\":\"Mark G. Maffett, Jorge O. Brusa\",\"doi\":\"10.59733/medalion.v3i4.63\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The results of this study show. (1) It can be seen that the value of the adjusted R square is 0.758 or 75.8%. This shows that consumer satisfaction (Y1) and advertising (X) can explain purchase intention (Y2) of 75.8%, the remaining 24.2% (100% - 75.8%) is explained by other variables outside the research model. This. Such as service, price and interest in buying. (2) The results of the (Partial) t test show that tcount (7.413) > ttable (1.685), likewise with a significance value of 0.00 <0.05, it can be concluded that the first hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the advertising variable (X) has an effect positive and significant to consumer satisfaction (Y1). (3) The results of the t test (Partial) can be seen that the value of tcount (3.059) > ttable (1.685), and the significance value is 0.00 <0.05, it can be concluded that the second hypothesis is accepted, meaning that advertising (X) has a positive and significant effect on purchase intention (Y2). (4) The results of the path analysis test show that the direct effect of variable X on variable Y2 is 0.377. While the indirect effect through the Y1 variable is 0.769 x 0.554 = 0.426, the calculation results obtained show that the indirect effect through the Y1 variable is greater than the direct effect on the Y2 variable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MEDALION JOURNAL: Medical Research, Nursing, Health and Midwife Participation\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MEDALION JOURNAL: Medical Research, Nursing, Health and Midwife Participation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59733/medalion.v3i4.63\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDALION JOURNAL: Medical Research, Nursing, Health and Midwife Participation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59733/medalion.v3i4.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的结果表明。(1)可以看出,调整后的R方值为0.758或75.8%。这表明消费者满意度(Y1)和广告(X)可以解释75.8%的购买意愿(Y2),剩余的24.2%(100% - 75.8%)是由研究模型之外的其他变量解释的。这一点。比如服务、价格和购买兴趣。(2)(偏)t检验结果显示,tcount (7.413) > table(1.685),同样显著性值为0.00 table(1.685),显著性值为0.00 <0.05,可以得出第二个假设被接受的结论,即广告(X)对购买意愿(Y2)有正向显著的影响。(4)通径分析检验结果表明,变量X对变量Y2的直接影响为0.377。而通过Y1变量的间接效应为0.769 x 0.554 = 0.426,计算结果表明,通过Y1变量的间接效应大于对Y2变量的直接效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EFFECT OF ONLINE ADVERTISING ON CONSUMER BUYING INTEREST IN ONLINE SELLING APPLICATIONS WITH CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AS AN INTERVENING VARIABLE (Case Study of Medical Doctor and Nurses in Chicago)
The results of this study show. (1) It can be seen that the value of the adjusted R square is 0.758 or 75.8%. This shows that consumer satisfaction (Y1) and advertising (X) can explain purchase intention (Y2) of 75.8%, the remaining 24.2% (100% - 75.8%) is explained by other variables outside the research model. This. Such as service, price and interest in buying. (2) The results of the (Partial) t test show that tcount (7.413) > ttable (1.685), likewise with a significance value of 0.00 <0.05, it can be concluded that the first hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the advertising variable (X) has an effect positive and significant to consumer satisfaction (Y1). (3) The results of the t test (Partial) can be seen that the value of tcount (3.059) > ttable (1.685), and the significance value is 0.00 <0.05, it can be concluded that the second hypothesis is accepted, meaning that advertising (X) has a positive and significant effect on purchase intention (Y2). (4) The results of the path analysis test show that the direct effect of variable X on variable Y2 is 0.377. While the indirect effect through the Y1 variable is 0.769 x 0.554 = 0.426, the calculation results obtained show that the indirect effect through the Y1 variable is greater than the direct effect on the Y2 variable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信