{"title":"富血小板纤维蛋白联合穿孔与非穿孔胶原膜治疗II类牙龈萎缩(一项临床比较研究)","authors":"Mahmoud Abd-Elsamee, M. Edrees, Ibraheem Mowafey","doi":"10.21608/aadj.2022.267323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of platelet rich fibrin (PRF) in combination with perforated versus non-perforated collagen membrane in treatment of class II gingival recession. Subjects and Methods : fourteen patients having at least one tooth with Miller’s Class II buccal/labial gingival recession defect after phase I therapy were classified into two groups, group 1 was treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with PRF membrane along with perforated collagen membrane and group 2 was treated with CAF combined with PRF membrane along with non-perforated collagen membrane. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Results: Both treatment groups showed significant root coverage, probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction, clinical attachment (CAL) gain and increase in width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) 6 months after surgery compared with baseline. However, there was a highly significant increase in WKG and CAL gain when collagen membrane was perforated. Conclusion: The perforated collagen membrane demonstrated clinical advantages beyond that achieved by the non-perforated one.","PeriodicalId":136230,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platelet-Rich Fibrin Combined with Perforated Versus Non-Perforated Collagen Membrane in Treatment of Class II Gingival Recession (A Comparative Clinical Study)\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Abd-Elsamee, M. Edrees, Ibraheem Mowafey\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/aadj.2022.267323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of platelet rich fibrin (PRF) in combination with perforated versus non-perforated collagen membrane in treatment of class II gingival recession. Subjects and Methods : fourteen patients having at least one tooth with Miller’s Class II buccal/labial gingival recession defect after phase I therapy were classified into two groups, group 1 was treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with PRF membrane along with perforated collagen membrane and group 2 was treated with CAF combined with PRF membrane along with non-perforated collagen membrane. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Results: Both treatment groups showed significant root coverage, probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction, clinical attachment (CAL) gain and increase in width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) 6 months after surgery compared with baseline. However, there was a highly significant increase in WKG and CAL gain when collagen membrane was perforated. Conclusion: The perforated collagen membrane demonstrated clinical advantages beyond that achieved by the non-perforated one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2022.267323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2022.267323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Platelet-Rich Fibrin Combined with Perforated Versus Non-Perforated Collagen Membrane in Treatment of Class II Gingival Recession (A Comparative Clinical Study)
Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of platelet rich fibrin (PRF) in combination with perforated versus non-perforated collagen membrane in treatment of class II gingival recession. Subjects and Methods : fourteen patients having at least one tooth with Miller’s Class II buccal/labial gingival recession defect after phase I therapy were classified into two groups, group 1 was treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with PRF membrane along with perforated collagen membrane and group 2 was treated with CAF combined with PRF membrane along with non-perforated collagen membrane. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Results: Both treatment groups showed significant root coverage, probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction, clinical attachment (CAL) gain and increase in width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) 6 months after surgery compared with baseline. However, there was a highly significant increase in WKG and CAL gain when collagen membrane was perforated. Conclusion: The perforated collagen membrane demonstrated clinical advantages beyond that achieved by the non-perforated one.