从人和组织因素中得出网络安全风险——一种社会技术方法

T. McEvoy, S. Kowalski
{"title":"从人和组织因素中得出网络安全风险——一种社会技术方法","authors":"T. McEvoy, S. Kowalski","doi":"10.7250/csimq.2019-18.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cyber security risks are socio-technical in nature. They result not just from technical vulnerabilities but also, more fundamentally, from the degradation of working practices over time – which move an organization across the boundary of secure practice to a place where attacks will not only succeed, but also have a significantly greater impact on the organization. Yet current risk analysis and management methodologies are not designed to detect these kinds of systemic risks. We present an approach, devised in the field, to deriving these risks – using a qualitative research methodology, akin to grounded theory, but based on preset coding descriptors. This allows organizational and individual behavior identified during interviews, observations or document research to be thematically analyzed, collated and mapped to potential risks, linked to poor working practices. The resulting risk factors can be linked together forming “risk narratives”, showing how the degradation of working practices in one part of the organization can contribute to undermining its ability to respond to cyber security threats in another part of the organization.","PeriodicalId":416219,"journal":{"name":"Complex Syst. Informatics Model. Q.","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deriving Cyber Security Risks from Human and Organizational Factors - A Socio-technical Approach\",\"authors\":\"T. McEvoy, S. Kowalski\",\"doi\":\"10.7250/csimq.2019-18.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cyber security risks are socio-technical in nature. They result not just from technical vulnerabilities but also, more fundamentally, from the degradation of working practices over time – which move an organization across the boundary of secure practice to a place where attacks will not only succeed, but also have a significantly greater impact on the organization. Yet current risk analysis and management methodologies are not designed to detect these kinds of systemic risks. We present an approach, devised in the field, to deriving these risks – using a qualitative research methodology, akin to grounded theory, but based on preset coding descriptors. This allows organizational and individual behavior identified during interviews, observations or document research to be thematically analyzed, collated and mapped to potential risks, linked to poor working practices. The resulting risk factors can be linked together forming “risk narratives”, showing how the degradation of working practices in one part of the organization can contribute to undermining its ability to respond to cyber security threats in another part of the organization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complex Syst. Informatics Model. Q.\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complex Syst. Informatics Model. Q.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2019-18.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex Syst. Informatics Model. Q.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2019-18.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

网络安全风险本质上是社会技术风险。它们不仅源于技术漏洞,更根本的是,还源于工作实践随着时间的推移而退化——这将使组织跨越安全实践的边界,到达攻击不仅会成功,而且会对组织产生更大影响的地方。然而,目前的风险分析和管理方法并不是为了检测这类系统性风险而设计的。我们提出了一种在该领域设计的方法来推导这些风险——使用一种定性研究方法,类似于扎根理论,但基于预设的编码描述符。这使得在访谈、观察或文件研究中确定的组织和个人行为可以进行主题分析、整理和映射到潜在风险,并与不良工作实践联系起来。由此产生的风险因素可以联系在一起,形成“风险叙述”,表明组织中一个部分的工作实践的退化如何导致组织中另一个部分响应网络安全威胁的能力受到破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deriving Cyber Security Risks from Human and Organizational Factors - A Socio-technical Approach
Cyber security risks are socio-technical in nature. They result not just from technical vulnerabilities but also, more fundamentally, from the degradation of working practices over time – which move an organization across the boundary of secure practice to a place where attacks will not only succeed, but also have a significantly greater impact on the organization. Yet current risk analysis and management methodologies are not designed to detect these kinds of systemic risks. We present an approach, devised in the field, to deriving these risks – using a qualitative research methodology, akin to grounded theory, but based on preset coding descriptors. This allows organizational and individual behavior identified during interviews, observations or document research to be thematically analyzed, collated and mapped to potential risks, linked to poor working practices. The resulting risk factors can be linked together forming “risk narratives”, showing how the degradation of working practices in one part of the organization can contribute to undermining its ability to respond to cyber security threats in another part of the organization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信