代码人为性:基于N-Gram模型的代码隐蔽性度量

Yuichiro Kanzaki, Akito Monden, C. Collberg
{"title":"代码人为性:基于N-Gram模型的代码隐蔽性度量","authors":"Yuichiro Kanzaki, Akito Monden, C. Collberg","doi":"10.1109/SPRO.2015.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a method for evaluating the artificiality of protected code by means of an N-gram model. The proposed artificiality metric helps us measure the stealth of the protected code, that is, the degree to which protected code can be distinguished from unprotected code. In a case study, we use the proposed method to evaluate the artificiality of programs that are transformed by well-known obfuscation techniques. The results show that static obfuscating transformations (e.g., Control flow flattening) have little effect on artificiality. However, dynamic obfuscating transformations (e.g., Code encryption), or a technique that inserts junk code fragments into the program, tend to increase the artificiality, which may have a significant impact on the stealth of the code.","PeriodicalId":338591,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Protection","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Code Artificiality: A Metric for the Code Stealth Based on an N-Gram Model\",\"authors\":\"Yuichiro Kanzaki, Akito Monden, C. Collberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPRO.2015.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes a method for evaluating the artificiality of protected code by means of an N-gram model. The proposed artificiality metric helps us measure the stealth of the protected code, that is, the degree to which protected code can be distinguished from unprotected code. In a case study, we use the proposed method to evaluate the artificiality of programs that are transformed by well-known obfuscation techniques. The results show that static obfuscating transformations (e.g., Control flow flattening) have little effect on artificiality. However, dynamic obfuscating transformations (e.g., Code encryption), or a technique that inserts junk code fragments into the program, tend to increase the artificiality, which may have a significant impact on the stealth of the code.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Protection\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPRO.2015.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPRO.2015.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

本文提出了一种利用N-gram模型评价受保护代码的人为性的方法。提出的人工度量帮助我们度量受保护代码的隐蔽性,也就是说,受保护的代码可以与未受保护的代码区分的程度。在一个案例研究中,我们使用提出的方法来评估由众所周知的混淆技术转换的程序的人为性。结果表明,静态模糊转换(例如,控制流平坦化)对人为性的影响很小。然而,动态混淆转换(例如,代码加密),或者在程序中插入垃圾代码片段的技术,倾向于增加人为性,这可能对代码的隐蔽性产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Code Artificiality: A Metric for the Code Stealth Based on an N-Gram Model
This paper proposes a method for evaluating the artificiality of protected code by means of an N-gram model. The proposed artificiality metric helps us measure the stealth of the protected code, that is, the degree to which protected code can be distinguished from unprotected code. In a case study, we use the proposed method to evaluate the artificiality of programs that are transformed by well-known obfuscation techniques. The results show that static obfuscating transformations (e.g., Control flow flattening) have little effect on artificiality. However, dynamic obfuscating transformations (e.g., Code encryption), or a technique that inserts junk code fragments into the program, tend to increase the artificiality, which may have a significant impact on the stealth of the code.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信