{"title":"证词和语法证据","authors":"Peter Elswyk","doi":"10.4324/9781315717937-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testimony is typically offered with the use of a declarative sentence. But declaratives differ from one language to the next. Does testimonial practice differ cross-linguistically too? This chapter discusses grammatical evidentials to illustrate that it does. My illustration of the significance of evidentials to the epistemology of testimony has a negative and a positive part. For the negative part, it is argued that some definitions of testimony are mistaken because they do not apply to testimony offered by a declarative containing an evidential. The positive component discusses a new puzzle presented by McCready (2015) that evidentials raise about the justificatory status of testimony-based beliefs.","PeriodicalId":438715,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testimony and grammatical evidentials\",\"authors\":\"Peter Elswyk\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315717937-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Testimony is typically offered with the use of a declarative sentence. But declaratives differ from one language to the next. Does testimonial practice differ cross-linguistically too? This chapter discusses grammatical evidentials to illustrate that it does. My illustration of the significance of evidentials to the epistemology of testimony has a negative and a positive part. For the negative part, it is argued that some definitions of testimony are mistaken because they do not apply to testimony offered by a declarative containing an evidential. The positive component discusses a new puzzle presented by McCready (2015) that evidentials raise about the justificatory status of testimony-based beliefs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717937-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717937-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Testimony is typically offered with the use of a declarative sentence. But declaratives differ from one language to the next. Does testimonial practice differ cross-linguistically too? This chapter discusses grammatical evidentials to illustrate that it does. My illustration of the significance of evidentials to the epistemology of testimony has a negative and a positive part. For the negative part, it is argued that some definitions of testimony are mistaken because they do not apply to testimony offered by a declarative containing an evidential. The positive component discusses a new puzzle presented by McCready (2015) that evidentials raise about the justificatory status of testimony-based beliefs.