传统面对面评估与在线评估的比较研究

Loo Ee Ng, Chin Kuo Ren, M. A. Karim, Nooradelana Mohd Ruslim
{"title":"传统面对面评估与在线评估的比较研究","authors":"Loo Ee Ng, Chin Kuo Ren, M. A. Karim, Nooradelana Mohd Ruslim","doi":"10.35307/csrij.v1i1.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to find an answer to the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of online learning. In this study, students’ academic performance based on continuous assessments and examination results were the indicator of effectiveness in learning. Descriptive analysis was used to compare students’ academic performance in grade point average (GPA) calculation in traditional face-to-face assessments and online assessments. Researchers also interested to find out about the attitudes of students and lecturers towards assessments in these two modes. Hence, a set of questionnaire is prepared with questions related to user’s experience, perceptions and preference while comparing traditional face-to-face assessments and online assessments. Findings from this study showed better academic performance in grade point average calculation where online assessments were conducted. Students’ responses in the questionnaire indicated online assessments are easier to do and easier to score; online assessments encourage independent learning and majority prefer online assessments. However, lecturers’ responses in the questionnaire indicated otherwise; higher percentages of lecturers preferred traditional face-to-face assessments to online assessments. From lecturers’ point of view, the traditional face-to-face assessments are fairer and less opportunity for cheating, hence, they are more confident in students’ answers and the results would reflect more accurately students’ actual learning achieved. This study concluded that online platform is an effective tool of learning and is well received and preferred among students.","PeriodicalId":111050,"journal":{"name":"CSR International Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study on Traditional Face-to-Face Assessments Versus Online Assessments\",\"authors\":\"Loo Ee Ng, Chin Kuo Ren, M. A. Karim, Nooradelana Mohd Ruslim\",\"doi\":\"10.35307/csrij.v1i1.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to find an answer to the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of online learning. In this study, students’ academic performance based on continuous assessments and examination results were the indicator of effectiveness in learning. Descriptive analysis was used to compare students’ academic performance in grade point average (GPA) calculation in traditional face-to-face assessments and online assessments. Researchers also interested to find out about the attitudes of students and lecturers towards assessments in these two modes. Hence, a set of questionnaire is prepared with questions related to user’s experience, perceptions and preference while comparing traditional face-to-face assessments and online assessments. Findings from this study showed better academic performance in grade point average calculation where online assessments were conducted. Students’ responses in the questionnaire indicated online assessments are easier to do and easier to score; online assessments encourage independent learning and majority prefer online assessments. However, lecturers’ responses in the questionnaire indicated otherwise; higher percentages of lecturers preferred traditional face-to-face assessments to online assessments. From lecturers’ point of view, the traditional face-to-face assessments are fairer and less opportunity for cheating, hence, they are more confident in students’ answers and the results would reflect more accurately students’ actual learning achieved. This study concluded that online platform is an effective tool of learning and is well received and preferred among students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CSR International Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CSR International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35307/csrij.v1i1.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CSR International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35307/csrij.v1i1.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在为正在进行的关于在线学习有效性的辩论找到答案。在本研究中,学生基于持续评估的学习成绩和考试成绩是学习有效性的指标。采用描述性分析比较了传统面对面评估和在线评估中学生的平均绩点(GPA)计算。研究人员也有兴趣了解学生和讲师对这两种模式下的评估的态度。因此,在比较传统的面对面评估和在线评估时,准备了一套问卷,其中包含与用户体验、感知和偏好相关的问题。这项研究的结果表明,在进行在线评估时,学生在平均成绩计算方面的学习成绩更好。学生在问卷中的回答表明,在线评估更容易做,更容易评分;在线评估鼓励自主学习,大多数人更喜欢在线评估。然而,讲师在问卷中的回答却显示出相反的情况;与在线评估相比,更高比例的讲师更喜欢传统的面对面评估。从讲师的角度来看,传统的面对面评估更公平,作弊的机会更少,因此他们对学生的答案更有信心,结果也更准确地反映了学生的实际学习成果。本研究的结论是,网络平台是一种有效的学习工具,受到学生的欢迎和青睐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study on Traditional Face-to-Face Assessments Versus Online Assessments
This research aims to find an answer to the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of online learning. In this study, students’ academic performance based on continuous assessments and examination results were the indicator of effectiveness in learning. Descriptive analysis was used to compare students’ academic performance in grade point average (GPA) calculation in traditional face-to-face assessments and online assessments. Researchers also interested to find out about the attitudes of students and lecturers towards assessments in these two modes. Hence, a set of questionnaire is prepared with questions related to user’s experience, perceptions and preference while comparing traditional face-to-face assessments and online assessments. Findings from this study showed better academic performance in grade point average calculation where online assessments were conducted. Students’ responses in the questionnaire indicated online assessments are easier to do and easier to score; online assessments encourage independent learning and majority prefer online assessments. However, lecturers’ responses in the questionnaire indicated otherwise; higher percentages of lecturers preferred traditional face-to-face assessments to online assessments. From lecturers’ point of view, the traditional face-to-face assessments are fairer and less opportunity for cheating, hence, they are more confident in students’ answers and the results would reflect more accurately students’ actual learning achieved. This study concluded that online platform is an effective tool of learning and is well received and preferred among students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信