{"title":"乌克兰刑法中的战争和军事罪:特点及其与国际刑法和外国立法的关系","authors":"Yu.A. Krychun","doi":"10.36550/2522-9230-2022-13-109-114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study deals with the conceptual and categorical apparatus of the field of criminal law, which relates to military and war crimes. It is noted that the concept of a war crime became enshrined in international legal acts relatively recently, namely in 1945 in the Statute of the Nuremberg Tribunal, but certain rules related to the prevention of war crimes existed from the time of the ancient slave-owning states of civilizations. The main norms regarding war crimes in the first modern sense of the codified act on the rules of war, the status of war victims, the rules of hostilities, namely the Liber Code of 1863, are given. Attention is focused on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of 1998, where war crimes are defined as gross violations of the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, as well as 26 other serious violations of the laws and customs of war, most of which have been considered crimes by states since the Second World War. Definitions of war crimes by various Ukrainian researchers are given: M. Piddubna, V. Repetsky, V. Lysyk, and others. The article points to the normative consolidation and definition of military criminal offenses and norms on war crimes in the Ukrainian national legislation. The foreign national legislation of Taiwan, the USA, and Poland regarding the regulation of the issue of military and war crimes is also analyzed. In conclusion, the main differences between war crimes and war crimes are given. It is also summarized that in democratic liberal legal states, different approaches to the regulation of offenses committed by military personnel during their service, that is, regarding war crimes, have developed. In English-language law, you can find the use of the terms \"military crime\" (as war crimes) and \"war crime\" (war crime). Punishment for war crimes can be defined as in the United States, where there is a separate Code dedicated to the offenses of military personnel of the US Army and the National Guard, which at the same time has its own military justice system.","PeriodicalId":420048,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Notes Series Law","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WAR AND MILITARY CRIMES IN CRIMINAL LAW OF UKRAINE: FEATURES AND RELATIONSHIP WITH INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW AND FOREIGN LEGISLATION\",\"authors\":\"Yu.A. Krychun\",\"doi\":\"10.36550/2522-9230-2022-13-109-114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study deals with the conceptual and categorical apparatus of the field of criminal law, which relates to military and war crimes. It is noted that the concept of a war crime became enshrined in international legal acts relatively recently, namely in 1945 in the Statute of the Nuremberg Tribunal, but certain rules related to the prevention of war crimes existed from the time of the ancient slave-owning states of civilizations. The main norms regarding war crimes in the first modern sense of the codified act on the rules of war, the status of war victims, the rules of hostilities, namely the Liber Code of 1863, are given. Attention is focused on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of 1998, where war crimes are defined as gross violations of the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, as well as 26 other serious violations of the laws and customs of war, most of which have been considered crimes by states since the Second World War. Definitions of war crimes by various Ukrainian researchers are given: M. Piddubna, V. Repetsky, V. Lysyk, and others. The article points to the normative consolidation and definition of military criminal offenses and norms on war crimes in the Ukrainian national legislation. The foreign national legislation of Taiwan, the USA, and Poland regarding the regulation of the issue of military and war crimes is also analyzed. In conclusion, the main differences between war crimes and war crimes are given. It is also summarized that in democratic liberal legal states, different approaches to the regulation of offenses committed by military personnel during their service, that is, regarding war crimes, have developed. In English-language law, you can find the use of the terms \\\"military crime\\\" (as war crimes) and \\\"war crime\\\" (war crime). Punishment for war crimes can be defined as in the United States, where there is a separate Code dedicated to the offenses of military personnel of the US Army and the National Guard, which at the same time has its own military justice system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":420048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Notes Series Law\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Notes Series Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36550/2522-9230-2022-13-109-114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Notes Series Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36550/2522-9230-2022-13-109-114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项研究涉及与军事和战争罪行有关的刑法领域的概念和分类机构。人们注意到,战争罪的概念是最近才载入国际法律文件的,即1945年载入《纽伦堡法庭规约》的,但是有关防止战争罪的某些规则从古代拥有奴隶的文明国家时期就存在了。本文给出了关于战争规则编纂法第一个现代意义上的战争罪的主要规范、战争受害者的地位、敌对行为规则,即1863年的《利伯法典》。人们的注意力集中在1998年《国际刑事法院罗马规约》上,其中对战争罪的定义是严重违反1949年8月12日《日内瓦公约》的行为,以及其他26种严重违反战争法和惯例的行为,其中大多数行为自第二次世界大战以来一直被各国视为罪行。本文给出了乌克兰不同研究人员对战争罪的定义:M. Piddubna, V. Repetsky, V. Lysyk等。文章指出乌克兰国家立法对军事刑事犯罪的规范巩固和界定以及对战争罪的规范。此外,本文还分析了台湾、美国、波兰等国家对军事和战争罪问题的立法。最后,给出了战争罪与战争罪的主要区别。本文还总结说,在民主自由的法制国家,对军人在服役期间所犯的罪行,即战争罪,制定了不同的管制办法。在英语法律中,你可以找到“军事罪”(作为战争罪)和“战争罪”(战争罪)这两个术语的使用。对战争罪的惩罚可以定义为在美国,那里有一个单独的法典专门针对美国陆军和国民警卫队的军事人员的罪行,同时有自己的军事司法系统。
WAR AND MILITARY CRIMES IN CRIMINAL LAW OF UKRAINE: FEATURES AND RELATIONSHIP WITH INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW AND FOREIGN LEGISLATION
The study deals with the conceptual and categorical apparatus of the field of criminal law, which relates to military and war crimes. It is noted that the concept of a war crime became enshrined in international legal acts relatively recently, namely in 1945 in the Statute of the Nuremberg Tribunal, but certain rules related to the prevention of war crimes existed from the time of the ancient slave-owning states of civilizations. The main norms regarding war crimes in the first modern sense of the codified act on the rules of war, the status of war victims, the rules of hostilities, namely the Liber Code of 1863, are given. Attention is focused on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of 1998, where war crimes are defined as gross violations of the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, as well as 26 other serious violations of the laws and customs of war, most of which have been considered crimes by states since the Second World War. Definitions of war crimes by various Ukrainian researchers are given: M. Piddubna, V. Repetsky, V. Lysyk, and others. The article points to the normative consolidation and definition of military criminal offenses and norms on war crimes in the Ukrainian national legislation. The foreign national legislation of Taiwan, the USA, and Poland regarding the regulation of the issue of military and war crimes is also analyzed. In conclusion, the main differences between war crimes and war crimes are given. It is also summarized that in democratic liberal legal states, different approaches to the regulation of offenses committed by military personnel during their service, that is, regarding war crimes, have developed. In English-language law, you can find the use of the terms "military crime" (as war crimes) and "war crime" (war crime). Punishment for war crimes can be defined as in the United States, where there is a separate Code dedicated to the offenses of military personnel of the US Army and the National Guard, which at the same time has its own military justice system.