伊朗的市场营销和财务问题

J. Bahrami
{"title":"伊朗的市场营销和财务问题","authors":"J. Bahrami","doi":"10.24200/jmas.vol6iss01pp43-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: When a financial crisis occurs, speculators typically get the blame whereas fundamentalists are presented as the safeguard against excessive volatility. Methodology: This paper consider two types: speculators and fundamentals who have the same information. Results: In this paper, excess volatility not only exists, but is actually fueled by fundamental trading. Conclusion: Consequently, efficient markets are more volatile with a few speculators than with many speculators and Existence of fundamentals ruins market’s liquidity and this may pose problems for traders, who intend to undertake frequent transactions.","PeriodicalId":370173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management and Accounting Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marketing and financial issues in Iran\",\"authors\":\"J. Bahrami\",\"doi\":\"10.24200/jmas.vol6iss01pp43-51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: When a financial crisis occurs, speculators typically get the blame whereas fundamentalists are presented as the safeguard against excessive volatility. Methodology: This paper consider two types: speculators and fundamentals who have the same information. Results: In this paper, excess volatility not only exists, but is actually fueled by fundamental trading. Conclusion: Consequently, efficient markets are more volatile with a few speculators than with many speculators and Existence of fundamentals ruins market’s liquidity and this may pose problems for traders, who intend to undertake frequent transactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management and Accounting Studies\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management and Accounting Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol6iss01pp43-51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management and Accounting Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol6iss01pp43-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:当金融危机发生时,投机者通常受到指责,而原教旨主义者则被视为防止过度波动的保障。方法:本文考虑两种类型:投机者和基本面谁拥有相同的信息。结果:在本文中,超额波动不仅存在,而且实际上是由基本面交易推动的。结论:因此,有效市场在少数投机者的情况下比在许多投机者的情况下更不稳定,基本面的存在破坏了市场的流动性,这可能会给打算进行频繁交易的交易者带来问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marketing and financial issues in Iran
Objective: When a financial crisis occurs, speculators typically get the blame whereas fundamentalists are presented as the safeguard against excessive volatility. Methodology: This paper consider two types: speculators and fundamentals who have the same information. Results: In this paper, excess volatility not only exists, but is actually fueled by fundamental trading. Conclusion: Consequently, efficient markets are more volatile with a few speculators than with many speculators and Existence of fundamentals ruins market’s liquidity and this may pose problems for traders, who intend to undertake frequent transactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信