Jacob D. Abernethy, Rafael M. Frongillo, Xiaolong Li, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan
{"title":"一个通用的量参数化做市框架","authors":"Jacob D. Abernethy, Rafael M. Frongillo, Xiaolong Li, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan","doi":"10.1145/2600057.2602900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a framework for automated market making for prediction markets, the volume parameterized market (VPM), in which securities are priced based on the market maker's current liabilities as well as the total volume of trade in the market. We provide a set of mathematical tools that can be used to analyze markets in this framework, and show that many existing market makers (including cost-function based markets [Chen and Pennock 2007; Abernethy et al. 2011, 2013], profit-charging markets [Othman and Sandholm 2012], and buy-only markets [Li and Vaughan 2013]) all fall into this framework as special cases. Using the framework, we design a new market maker, the perspective market, that satisfies four desirable properties (worst-case loss, no arbitrage, increasing liquidity, and shrinking spread) in the complex market setting, but fails to satisfy information incorporation. However, we show that the sacrifice of information incorporation is unavoidable: we prove an impossibility result showing that any market maker that prices securities based only on the trade history cannot satisfy all five properties simultaneously. Instead, we show that perspective markets may satisfy a weaker notion that we call center-price information incorporation.","PeriodicalId":203155,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation","volume":"25 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A general volume-parameterized market making framework\",\"authors\":\"Jacob D. Abernethy, Rafael M. Frongillo, Xiaolong Li, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2600057.2602900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce a framework for automated market making for prediction markets, the volume parameterized market (VPM), in which securities are priced based on the market maker's current liabilities as well as the total volume of trade in the market. We provide a set of mathematical tools that can be used to analyze markets in this framework, and show that many existing market makers (including cost-function based markets [Chen and Pennock 2007; Abernethy et al. 2011, 2013], profit-charging markets [Othman and Sandholm 2012], and buy-only markets [Li and Vaughan 2013]) all fall into this framework as special cases. Using the framework, we design a new market maker, the perspective market, that satisfies four desirable properties (worst-case loss, no arbitrage, increasing liquidity, and shrinking spread) in the complex market setting, but fails to satisfy information incorporation. However, we show that the sacrifice of information incorporation is unavoidable: we prove an impossibility result showing that any market maker that prices securities based only on the trade history cannot satisfy all five properties simultaneously. Instead, we show that perspective markets may satisfy a weaker notion that we call center-price information incorporation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":203155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation\",\"volume\":\"25 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2600057.2602900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2600057.2602900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
我们为预测市场引入了一个自动做市的框架,即成交量参数化市场(VPM),其中证券的定价基于做市商的流动负债以及市场上的总交易量。我们提供了一套数学工具,可用于分析该框架下的市场,并表明许多现有的做市商(包括基于成本函数的市场[Chen and Pennock 2007;Abernethy et al. 2011, 2013], profit charge市场[Othman and Sandholm 2012], buy-only市场[Li and Vaughan 2013])都属于这一框架的特殊情况。利用该框架,我们设计了一种新的做市商——前景市场,它在复杂的市场环境中满足最坏情况损失、无套利、流动性增加和价差缩小四个理想属性,但不满足信息合并。然而,我们证明了信息整合的牺牲是不可避免的:我们证明了一个不可能结果,表明任何仅根据交易历史定价证券的做市商都不能同时满足所有五个属性。相反,我们表明,前景市场可能满足一个较弱的概念,我们称之为中心价格信息合并。
A general volume-parameterized market making framework
We introduce a framework for automated market making for prediction markets, the volume parameterized market (VPM), in which securities are priced based on the market maker's current liabilities as well as the total volume of trade in the market. We provide a set of mathematical tools that can be used to analyze markets in this framework, and show that many existing market makers (including cost-function based markets [Chen and Pennock 2007; Abernethy et al. 2011, 2013], profit-charging markets [Othman and Sandholm 2012], and buy-only markets [Li and Vaughan 2013]) all fall into this framework as special cases. Using the framework, we design a new market maker, the perspective market, that satisfies four desirable properties (worst-case loss, no arbitrage, increasing liquidity, and shrinking spread) in the complex market setting, but fails to satisfy information incorporation. However, we show that the sacrifice of information incorporation is unavoidable: we prove an impossibility result showing that any market maker that prices securities based only on the trade history cannot satisfy all five properties simultaneously. Instead, we show that perspective markets may satisfy a weaker notion that we call center-price information incorporation.