自由与义务

Ishtiyaque Haji
{"title":"自由与义务","authors":"Ishtiyaque Haji","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190050856.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter first summarizes the responsibility dilemma—responsibility is incompatible with both determinism and its falsity—and then outlines the homologous obligation dilemma. It primarily focuses on showing that obligation requires alternative possibilities: an obligation for one to do something presupposes that one can do, and one can refrain from doing, it. Four principles undergird the view that obligation entails avoidability: (i) If one ought to do something, then one can do it; (ii) if it is impermissible for one to do something, then one can do it; (iii) one ought to do something if, and only if, it is impermissible for one not to do it; and (iv) if it is impermissible for one to do something, there is something else one can do, which is obligatory for one. A formidable analysis of the concept of obligation validates these principles.","PeriodicalId":436722,"journal":{"name":"The Obligation Dilemma","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Freedom and Obligation\",\"authors\":\"Ishtiyaque Haji\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190050856.003.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter first summarizes the responsibility dilemma—responsibility is incompatible with both determinism and its falsity—and then outlines the homologous obligation dilemma. It primarily focuses on showing that obligation requires alternative possibilities: an obligation for one to do something presupposes that one can do, and one can refrain from doing, it. Four principles undergird the view that obligation entails avoidability: (i) If one ought to do something, then one can do it; (ii) if it is impermissible for one to do something, then one can do it; (iii) one ought to do something if, and only if, it is impermissible for one not to do it; and (iv) if it is impermissible for one to do something, there is something else one can do, which is obligatory for one. A formidable analysis of the concept of obligation validates these principles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Obligation Dilemma\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Obligation Dilemma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190050856.003.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Obligation Dilemma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190050856.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章首先概述了责任困境——责任既与决定论不相容,又与决定论的虚假性不相容——然后概述了相应的义务困境。它主要侧重于表明义务需要其他可能性:一个人做某事的义务以一个人可以做某事和一个人可以不做某事为前提。有四项原则支持义务包含可避免性的观点:(i)如果一个人应该做某事,那么他就可以做;(ii)如果某件事是不允许的,那么他就可以去做;(iii)当且仅当不允许做某件事时,一个人应该去做;(四)如果某件事是不允许的,那就有另一件事是可以做的,这是必须做的。对义务概念的有力分析证实了这些原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Freedom and Obligation
This chapter first summarizes the responsibility dilemma—responsibility is incompatible with both determinism and its falsity—and then outlines the homologous obligation dilemma. It primarily focuses on showing that obligation requires alternative possibilities: an obligation for one to do something presupposes that one can do, and one can refrain from doing, it. Four principles undergird the view that obligation entails avoidability: (i) If one ought to do something, then one can do it; (ii) if it is impermissible for one to do something, then one can do it; (iii) one ought to do something if, and only if, it is impermissible for one not to do it; and (iv) if it is impermissible for one to do something, there is something else one can do, which is obligatory for one. A formidable analysis of the concept of obligation validates these principles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信