{"title":"更好的生产流程建模:企业再造,计算物流中的资源和物料规划","authors":"S. Kristoffersen","doi":"10.1145/2812428.2812440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines standard methods for work- and production flow modelling, and find that in some regards they are fundamentally being naïve and erroneous. They simplify and \"flatten\" too much of the reality that they represent and allow much more than they can afford when it comes to using them for organizational re-design. The problem is exacerbated when computational handling is considered. In this paper we illustrate the shortcoming with two industrial case studies, which we have approached ethnographically and through workshops.","PeriodicalId":316788,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Better workflow modelling of production processes: re-engineering enterprise, resource and material planning in computational logistics\",\"authors\":\"S. Kristoffersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2812428.2812440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines standard methods for work- and production flow modelling, and find that in some regards they are fundamentally being naïve and erroneous. They simplify and \\\"flatten\\\" too much of the reality that they represent and allow much more than they can afford when it comes to using them for organizational re-design. The problem is exacerbated when computational handling is considered. In this paper we illustrate the shortcoming with two industrial case studies, which we have approached ethnographically and through workshops.\",\"PeriodicalId\":316788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2812428.2812440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2812428.2812440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Better workflow modelling of production processes: re-engineering enterprise, resource and material planning in computational logistics
This paper examines standard methods for work- and production flow modelling, and find that in some regards they are fundamentally being naïve and erroneous. They simplify and "flatten" too much of the reality that they represent and allow much more than they can afford when it comes to using them for organizational re-design. The problem is exacerbated when computational handling is considered. In this paper we illustrate the shortcoming with two industrial case studies, which we have approached ethnographically and through workshops.