更好的生产流程建模:企业再造,计算物流中的资源和物料规划

S. Kristoffersen
{"title":"更好的生产流程建模:企业再造,计算物流中的资源和物料规划","authors":"S. Kristoffersen","doi":"10.1145/2812428.2812440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines standard methods for work- and production flow modelling, and find that in some regards they are fundamentally being naïve and erroneous. They simplify and \"flatten\" too much of the reality that they represent and allow much more than they can afford when it comes to using them for organizational re-design. The problem is exacerbated when computational handling is considered. In this paper we illustrate the shortcoming with two industrial case studies, which we have approached ethnographically and through workshops.","PeriodicalId":316788,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Better workflow modelling of production processes: re-engineering enterprise, resource and material planning in computational logistics\",\"authors\":\"S. Kristoffersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2812428.2812440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines standard methods for work- and production flow modelling, and find that in some regards they are fundamentally being naïve and erroneous. They simplify and \\\"flatten\\\" too much of the reality that they represent and allow much more than they can afford when it comes to using them for organizational re-design. The problem is exacerbated when computational handling is considered. In this paper we illustrate the shortcoming with two industrial case studies, which we have approached ethnographically and through workshops.\",\"PeriodicalId\":316788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2812428.2812440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2812428.2812440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了工作和生产流程建模的标准方法,并发现在某些方面它们从根本上是naïve和错误的。它们简化和“扁平化”了太多它们所代表的现实,并且在使用它们进行组织重新设计时允许超出它们所能承受的范围。当考虑计算处理时,问题变得更加严重。在本文中,我们用两个工业案例研究说明了这一缺点,我们已经接近民族志和通过研讨会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Better workflow modelling of production processes: re-engineering enterprise, resource and material planning in computational logistics
This paper examines standard methods for work- and production flow modelling, and find that in some regards they are fundamentally being naïve and erroneous. They simplify and "flatten" too much of the reality that they represent and allow much more than they can afford when it comes to using them for organizational re-design. The problem is exacerbated when computational handling is considered. In this paper we illustrate the shortcoming with two industrial case studies, which we have approached ethnographically and through workshops.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信