V. Al, Brandt Pm, O. L., Heyde Gs, de Jonghe Jfm, Wijnen Vjm, V. Wa
{"title":"评估痴呆患者谵妄严重程度:护士“痴呆谵妄评估量表”(DIDAS)","authors":"V. Al, Brandt Pm, O. L., Heyde Gs, de Jonghe Jfm, Wijnen Vjm, V. Wa","doi":"10.26420/gerontolgeriatrres.2022.1069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Prevalence of delirium is increased in patients with dementia. Monitoring of the severity of Delirium Superimposed on Dementia (DSD) may help to improve the quality of care in patients suffering from this condition. This proof-of-concept study aims to provide a first exploration of the reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the Delirium-In-Dementia-Assessment-Scale (DIDAS), a 10-item nurses’ observation scale to be used as a tool to screen for symptoms and measure severity of DSD. Methods: A first cross sectional and repeated measurement study of the DIDAS was conducted in a closed psychogeriatric unit of a general psychiatric hospital. All patients admitted to this ward were enrolled in this study to assess DIDAS’ validity, reliability, discriminative power and ability to measure delirium severity. Results: 589 DIDAS questionnaires were completed in 17 patients yielding a high internal consistency (a = 0.86) for the total DIDAS scores. Mean day DIDAS scores were significantly higher in patients with DSD compared to patients without DSD (Cohen’s d 1.02). The effect size on item level ranged from Cohen’s d of 0.27 to 0.72. A statistically significant correlation (Spearman’s Rho 0.626) was found between the mean DIDAS score per patient per day and a Likert score for global clinical severity. Conclusion: The DIDAS seems a reliable instrument for nurses to measure severity of DSD and monitor the course of DSD severity over time.","PeriodicalId":310319,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology & Geriatrics: Research","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Delirium Severity in Patients with Dementia: A Nurses’ ‘Delirium in Dementia Assessment Scale’ (DIDAS)\",\"authors\":\"V. Al, Brandt Pm, O. L., Heyde Gs, de Jonghe Jfm, Wijnen Vjm, V. Wa\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/gerontolgeriatrres.2022.1069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Prevalence of delirium is increased in patients with dementia. Monitoring of the severity of Delirium Superimposed on Dementia (DSD) may help to improve the quality of care in patients suffering from this condition. This proof-of-concept study aims to provide a first exploration of the reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the Delirium-In-Dementia-Assessment-Scale (DIDAS), a 10-item nurses’ observation scale to be used as a tool to screen for symptoms and measure severity of DSD. Methods: A first cross sectional and repeated measurement study of the DIDAS was conducted in a closed psychogeriatric unit of a general psychiatric hospital. All patients admitted to this ward were enrolled in this study to assess DIDAS’ validity, reliability, discriminative power and ability to measure delirium severity. Results: 589 DIDAS questionnaires were completed in 17 patients yielding a high internal consistency (a = 0.86) for the total DIDAS scores. Mean day DIDAS scores were significantly higher in patients with DSD compared to patients without DSD (Cohen’s d 1.02). The effect size on item level ranged from Cohen’s d of 0.27 to 0.72. A statistically significant correlation (Spearman’s Rho 0.626) was found between the mean DIDAS score per patient per day and a Likert score for global clinical severity. Conclusion: The DIDAS seems a reliable instrument for nurses to measure severity of DSD and monitor the course of DSD severity over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":310319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontology & Geriatrics: Research\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontology & Geriatrics: Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/gerontolgeriatrres.2022.1069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology & Geriatrics: Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/gerontolgeriatrres.2022.1069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:痴呆患者谵妄的患病率增加。监测谵妄叠加痴呆(DSD)的严重程度可能有助于改善患有这种疾病的患者的护理质量。本概念验证性研究旨在首次探索谵妄-痴呆评估量表(DIDAS)的信度、效度和对变化的敏感性,DIDAS是一种10项护士观察量表,用于筛查DSD的症状和测量严重程度。方法:对DIDAS进行了首次横断面和重复测量研究,在一家普通精神病院的封闭老年精神科进行。本研究纳入该病房的所有患者,以评估DIDAS的效度、信度、判别能力和测量谵妄严重程度的能力。结果:17例患者完成了589份DIDAS问卷,DIDAS总分具有较高的内部一致性(a = 0.86)。与无DSD患者相比,DSD患者的平均DIDAS评分显著高于无DSD患者(Cohen’s d = 1.02)。项目水平上的效应量Cohen 's d为0.27 ~ 0.72。每位患者每天的平均DIDAS评分与总体临床严重程度的Likert评分之间存在统计学上显著的相关性(Spearman的Rho为0.626)。结论:DIDAS是护士测量DSD严重程度和监测DSD严重程度随时间变化的可靠工具。
Measuring Delirium Severity in Patients with Dementia: A Nurses’ ‘Delirium in Dementia Assessment Scale’ (DIDAS)
Objectives: Prevalence of delirium is increased in patients with dementia. Monitoring of the severity of Delirium Superimposed on Dementia (DSD) may help to improve the quality of care in patients suffering from this condition. This proof-of-concept study aims to provide a first exploration of the reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the Delirium-In-Dementia-Assessment-Scale (DIDAS), a 10-item nurses’ observation scale to be used as a tool to screen for symptoms and measure severity of DSD. Methods: A first cross sectional and repeated measurement study of the DIDAS was conducted in a closed psychogeriatric unit of a general psychiatric hospital. All patients admitted to this ward were enrolled in this study to assess DIDAS’ validity, reliability, discriminative power and ability to measure delirium severity. Results: 589 DIDAS questionnaires were completed in 17 patients yielding a high internal consistency (a = 0.86) for the total DIDAS scores. Mean day DIDAS scores were significantly higher in patients with DSD compared to patients without DSD (Cohen’s d 1.02). The effect size on item level ranged from Cohen’s d of 0.27 to 0.72. A statistically significant correlation (Spearman’s Rho 0.626) was found between the mean DIDAS score per patient per day and a Likert score for global clinical severity. Conclusion: The DIDAS seems a reliable instrument for nurses to measure severity of DSD and monitor the course of DSD severity over time.