梦与尘

Joseph Rex Young
{"title":"梦与尘","authors":"Joseph Rex Young","doi":"10.3828/extr.2022.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAn emerging body of opinion cites the Daenerys subplot in George R. R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire (1996-) as a white savior narrative. This article argues against this. Martin presents his emblematic medievalist Occident as equally barbaric as his Orient, disabling the Manichean colonialist allegory some scholars perceive in his work. Although Daenerys certainly thinks like a colonialist savior, such discourse makes most sense as Bakhtinian image of a language, exhibited by Martin in concert with depictions of the intractable problems her actions cause, to mount a polemic authorial critique of colonialist literature. Support for this reading can be found elsewhere in Martin’s work, in which he frequently critiques uncritical espousals of literary tropes, and in his careful moral variegation of the peoples Daenerys conquers.","PeriodicalId":249855,"journal":{"name":"Extrapolation: Volume 63, Issue 2","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dreams and Dust\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Rex Young\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/extr.2022.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nAn emerging body of opinion cites the Daenerys subplot in George R. R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire (1996-) as a white savior narrative. This article argues against this. Martin presents his emblematic medievalist Occident as equally barbaric as his Orient, disabling the Manichean colonialist allegory some scholars perceive in his work. Although Daenerys certainly thinks like a colonialist savior, such discourse makes most sense as Bakhtinian image of a language, exhibited by Martin in concert with depictions of the intractable problems her actions cause, to mount a polemic authorial critique of colonialist literature. Support for this reading can be found elsewhere in Martin’s work, in which he frequently critiques uncritical espousals of literary tropes, and in his careful moral variegation of the peoples Daenerys conquers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extrapolation: Volume 63, Issue 2\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extrapolation: Volume 63, Issue 2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2022.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extrapolation: Volume 63, Issue 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2022.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一种新兴的观点认为,乔治·r·r·马丁的《冰与火之歌》(1996-)中丹妮莉丝的次要情节是白人救世主的叙事。本文对此进行了反驳。马丁将他所描绘的中世纪西方与他所描绘的东方一样野蛮,使一些学者在他的作品中所看到的摩尼教殖民主义寓言失去了意义。虽然丹妮莉丝肯定认为自己是殖民主义的救世主,但马丁展示的这种语言的巴赫蒂尼式形象,以及对她的行为引发的棘手问题的描述,是对殖民主义文学的一种争论性的作者批评,这种话语最有意义。对这种解读的支持可以在马丁的其他作品中找到,在他的作品中,他经常批评对文学比喻的不加批判的拥护,在他对丹妮莉丝征服的人民的仔细的道德变化中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dreams and Dust
An emerging body of opinion cites the Daenerys subplot in George R. R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire (1996-) as a white savior narrative. This article argues against this. Martin presents his emblematic medievalist Occident as equally barbaric as his Orient, disabling the Manichean colonialist allegory some scholars perceive in his work. Although Daenerys certainly thinks like a colonialist savior, such discourse makes most sense as Bakhtinian image of a language, exhibited by Martin in concert with depictions of the intractable problems her actions cause, to mount a polemic authorial critique of colonialist literature. Support for this reading can be found elsewhere in Martin’s work, in which he frequently critiques uncritical espousals of literary tropes, and in his careful moral variegation of the peoples Daenerys conquers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信