基于Friedman测试的无线网状网络节点布局分析:禁忌搜索与爬坡的比较研究

Tetsuya Oda, Donald Elmazi, Algenti Lala, Vladi Koliçi, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa
{"title":"基于Friedman测试的无线网状网络节点布局分析:禁忌搜索与爬坡的比较研究","authors":"Tetsuya Oda, Donald Elmazi, Algenti Lala, Vladi Koliçi, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa","doi":"10.1109/IMIS.2015.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we deal with connectivity and coverage problem in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs). We used Friedman test to check if we can compare Tabu Search (TS) and Hill Climbing (HC). We found out that TS and HC have differences in their performance. Then, we used the implemented systems WMN-TS and WMN-HC to evaluate and compare the performance of the systems for different distributions of mesh clients in terms of Size of Giant Component (SGC) and Number of Covered Mesh Clients (NCMC). The simulation results show that for Uniform distribution, for small radius of communication distance, the SGC of WMN-TS is better than WMN-HC. For Normal distribution, the WMN-HC performs better than WMN-TS. For Exponential distribution, the WMN-HC performs better than WMN-TS for all radius of communication distances. For Weibull distribution, the WMN-HC has a good performance for big radius of communication distance.","PeriodicalId":144834,"journal":{"name":"2015 9th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Node Placement in Wireless Mesh Networks Using Friedman Test: A Comparison Study for Tabu Search and Hill Climbing\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuya Oda, Donald Elmazi, Algenti Lala, Vladi Koliçi, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMIS.2015.84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we deal with connectivity and coverage problem in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs). We used Friedman test to check if we can compare Tabu Search (TS) and Hill Climbing (HC). We found out that TS and HC have differences in their performance. Then, we used the implemented systems WMN-TS and WMN-HC to evaluate and compare the performance of the systems for different distributions of mesh clients in terms of Size of Giant Component (SGC) and Number of Covered Mesh Clients (NCMC). The simulation results show that for Uniform distribution, for small radius of communication distance, the SGC of WMN-TS is better than WMN-HC. For Normal distribution, the WMN-HC performs better than WMN-TS. For Exponential distribution, the WMN-HC performs better than WMN-TS for all radius of communication distances. For Weibull distribution, the WMN-HC has a good performance for big radius of communication distance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 9th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 9th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMIS.2015.84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 9th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMIS.2015.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文主要研究无线网状网络(WMNs)中的连通性和覆盖问题。我们使用Friedman检验来检验是否可以比较禁忌搜索(TS)和爬山(HC)。我们发现TS和HC在性能上存在差异。然后,我们使用实现的系统WMN-TS和WMN-HC在巨型组件大小(SGC)和覆盖网格客户端数量(NCMC)方面评估和比较了系统在不同网格客户端分布下的性能。仿真结果表明,在分布均匀、通信距离半径较小的情况下,WMN-TS的SGC优于WMN-HC。对于正态分布,WMN-HC优于WMN-TS。对于指数分布,WMN-HC在所有通信距离半径上都优于WMN-TS。对于威布尔分布,WMN-HC在通信距离半径较大的情况下具有良好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Node Placement in Wireless Mesh Networks Using Friedman Test: A Comparison Study for Tabu Search and Hill Climbing
In this paper, we deal with connectivity and coverage problem in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs). We used Friedman test to check if we can compare Tabu Search (TS) and Hill Climbing (HC). We found out that TS and HC have differences in their performance. Then, we used the implemented systems WMN-TS and WMN-HC to evaluate and compare the performance of the systems for different distributions of mesh clients in terms of Size of Giant Component (SGC) and Number of Covered Mesh Clients (NCMC). The simulation results show that for Uniform distribution, for small radius of communication distance, the SGC of WMN-TS is better than WMN-HC. For Normal distribution, the WMN-HC performs better than WMN-TS. For Exponential distribution, the WMN-HC performs better than WMN-TS for all radius of communication distances. For Weibull distribution, the WMN-HC has a good performance for big radius of communication distance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信