Tetsuya Oda, Donald Elmazi, Algenti Lala, Vladi Koliçi, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa
{"title":"基于Friedman测试的无线网状网络节点布局分析:禁忌搜索与爬坡的比较研究","authors":"Tetsuya Oda, Donald Elmazi, Algenti Lala, Vladi Koliçi, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa","doi":"10.1109/IMIS.2015.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we deal with connectivity and coverage problem in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs). We used Friedman test to check if we can compare Tabu Search (TS) and Hill Climbing (HC). We found out that TS and HC have differences in their performance. Then, we used the implemented systems WMN-TS and WMN-HC to evaluate and compare the performance of the systems for different distributions of mesh clients in terms of Size of Giant Component (SGC) and Number of Covered Mesh Clients (NCMC). The simulation results show that for Uniform distribution, for small radius of communication distance, the SGC of WMN-TS is better than WMN-HC. For Normal distribution, the WMN-HC performs better than WMN-TS. For Exponential distribution, the WMN-HC performs better than WMN-TS for all radius of communication distances. For Weibull distribution, the WMN-HC has a good performance for big radius of communication distance.","PeriodicalId":144834,"journal":{"name":"2015 9th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Node Placement in Wireless Mesh Networks Using Friedman Test: A Comparison Study for Tabu Search and Hill Climbing\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuya Oda, Donald Elmazi, Algenti Lala, Vladi Koliçi, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMIS.2015.84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we deal with connectivity and coverage problem in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs). We used Friedman test to check if we can compare Tabu Search (TS) and Hill Climbing (HC). We found out that TS and HC have differences in their performance. Then, we used the implemented systems WMN-TS and WMN-HC to evaluate and compare the performance of the systems for different distributions of mesh clients in terms of Size of Giant Component (SGC) and Number of Covered Mesh Clients (NCMC). The simulation results show that for Uniform distribution, for small radius of communication distance, the SGC of WMN-TS is better than WMN-HC. For Normal distribution, the WMN-HC performs better than WMN-TS. For Exponential distribution, the WMN-HC performs better than WMN-TS for all radius of communication distances. For Weibull distribution, the WMN-HC has a good performance for big radius of communication distance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 9th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 9th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMIS.2015.84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 9th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMIS.2015.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of Node Placement in Wireless Mesh Networks Using Friedman Test: A Comparison Study for Tabu Search and Hill Climbing
In this paper, we deal with connectivity and coverage problem in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs). We used Friedman test to check if we can compare Tabu Search (TS) and Hill Climbing (HC). We found out that TS and HC have differences in their performance. Then, we used the implemented systems WMN-TS and WMN-HC to evaluate and compare the performance of the systems for different distributions of mesh clients in terms of Size of Giant Component (SGC) and Number of Covered Mesh Clients (NCMC). The simulation results show that for Uniform distribution, for small radius of communication distance, the SGC of WMN-TS is better than WMN-HC. For Normal distribution, the WMN-HC performs better than WMN-TS. For Exponential distribution, the WMN-HC performs better than WMN-TS for all radius of communication distances. For Weibull distribution, the WMN-HC has a good performance for big radius of communication distance.