堕胎的对与错

J. Finnis, Marshall Cohen, T. Nagel, T. Scanlon
{"title":"堕胎的对与错","authors":"J. Finnis, Marshall Cohen, T. Nagel, T. Scanlon","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580071.003.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During its first two years of publication, \"Philosophy & Public Affairs\" contributed to the public debate on abortion a set of remarkable and brilliant articles which examine the basic philosophical issues posed by this controversial subject: whether the fetus is a person, whether it has a right to life, whether a woman has a right to decide what happens in and to her body, whether there is an ethical connection between abortion and infanticide, whether there is any point after conception where it is possible to draw the line beyond which killing is impermissible. These five essays, together here for the first time in a single volume, offer radically differing points of view; they provide the best sustained discussion of these philosophical issues available anywhere.Contents: Judith Jarvis Thomson, \"A Defense of Abortion\"; Roger Wertheimer, \"Understanding the Abortion Argument\"; Michael Tooley, \"Abortion and Infanticide\"; John Finnis, \"The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion\"; and Judith Jarvis Thomson, \"Rights and Deaths.\"","PeriodicalId":293081,"journal":{"name":"Rights and Wrongs of Abortion","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1974-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion\",\"authors\":\"J. Finnis, Marshall Cohen, T. Nagel, T. Scanlon\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580071.003.0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During its first two years of publication, \\\"Philosophy & Public Affairs\\\" contributed to the public debate on abortion a set of remarkable and brilliant articles which examine the basic philosophical issues posed by this controversial subject: whether the fetus is a person, whether it has a right to life, whether a woman has a right to decide what happens in and to her body, whether there is an ethical connection between abortion and infanticide, whether there is any point after conception where it is possible to draw the line beyond which killing is impermissible. These five essays, together here for the first time in a single volume, offer radically differing points of view; they provide the best sustained discussion of these philosophical issues available anywhere.Contents: Judith Jarvis Thomson, \\\"A Defense of Abortion\\\"; Roger Wertheimer, \\\"Understanding the Abortion Argument\\\"; Michael Tooley, \\\"Abortion and Infanticide\\\"; John Finnis, \\\"The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion\\\"; and Judith Jarvis Thomson, \\\"Rights and Deaths.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":293081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rights and Wrongs of Abortion\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1974-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rights and Wrongs of Abortion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580071.003.0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rights and Wrongs of Abortion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580071.003.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

在出版的头两年里,《哲学与公共事务》为公众对堕胎的辩论做出了贡献,发表了一系列杰出的文章,探讨了这个有争议的话题所带来的基本哲学问题:胎儿是否是一个人,它是否有生命权,妇女是否有权决定在她的身体内和身体上发生的事情,堕胎和杀婴之间是否存在道德上的联系,怀孕后是否有可能划定不允许杀人的界限。这五篇文章第一次集中在一起,提供了截然不同的观点;他们为这些哲学问题提供了最好的持续讨论。内容:朱迪思·贾维斯·汤姆森《为堕胎辩护》;罗杰·韦特海默,《理解堕胎之争》;迈克尔·托雷,《堕胎与杀婴》;约翰·菲尼斯,《堕胎的对与错》;以及朱迪斯·贾维斯·汤姆森的《权利与死亡》
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion
During its first two years of publication, "Philosophy & Public Affairs" contributed to the public debate on abortion a set of remarkable and brilliant articles which examine the basic philosophical issues posed by this controversial subject: whether the fetus is a person, whether it has a right to life, whether a woman has a right to decide what happens in and to her body, whether there is an ethical connection between abortion and infanticide, whether there is any point after conception where it is possible to draw the line beyond which killing is impermissible. These five essays, together here for the first time in a single volume, offer radically differing points of view; they provide the best sustained discussion of these philosophical issues available anywhere.Contents: Judith Jarvis Thomson, "A Defense of Abortion"; Roger Wertheimer, "Understanding the Abortion Argument"; Michael Tooley, "Abortion and Infanticide"; John Finnis, "The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion"; and Judith Jarvis Thomson, "Rights and Deaths."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信