任意形状聚类两种算法的性能比较

Mariam Khader, Ghazi Al-Naymat
{"title":"任意形状聚类两种算法的性能比较","authors":"Mariam Khader, Ghazi Al-Naymat","doi":"10.1109/ACIT47987.2019.8991143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discovering clusters with arbitrary shapes has attracted a large number of researchers, due to its importance in analyzing real-world datasets. DENCLUE is an efficient density-based algorithm that provides a compact mathematical definition of clusters with arbitrary shapes. Several variants of DENCLUE have been proposed to enhance its performance, including DENCLUE 2.0. This study aims to discuss the difference between the two variants, DENCLUE 1.0 and DENCLUE 2.0. This will allow for future improvements on both variants and determining the best variant for specific types of datasets. The Adjusted Rand Index measure is used to evaluate the difference between the clustering results of both algorithms. The experimental results conclude that DECNLUE 1.0 outperforms DENCLUE 2.0 in discovering clusters with arbitrary shapes. Specifically, in datasets that contain clusters with multiple modes.","PeriodicalId":314091,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of Two Algorithms for Arbitrary Shapes Clustering\",\"authors\":\"Mariam Khader, Ghazi Al-Naymat\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACIT47987.2019.8991143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discovering clusters with arbitrary shapes has attracted a large number of researchers, due to its importance in analyzing real-world datasets. DENCLUE is an efficient density-based algorithm that provides a compact mathematical definition of clusters with arbitrary shapes. Several variants of DENCLUE have been proposed to enhance its performance, including DENCLUE 2.0. This study aims to discuss the difference between the two variants, DENCLUE 1.0 and DENCLUE 2.0. This will allow for future improvements on both variants and determining the best variant for specific types of datasets. The Adjusted Rand Index measure is used to evaluate the difference between the clustering results of both algorithms. The experimental results conclude that DECNLUE 1.0 outperforms DENCLUE 2.0 in discovering clusters with arbitrary shapes. Specifically, in datasets that contain clusters with multiple modes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT47987.2019.8991143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT47987.2019.8991143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

发现具有任意形状的簇吸引了大量的研究人员,因为它在分析现实世界的数据集方面很重要。DENCLUE是一种高效的基于密度的算法,它提供了具有任意形状的聚类的紧凑数学定义。已经提出了DENCLUE的几个变体来增强其性能,包括DENCLUE 2.0。本研究旨在讨论DENCLUE 1.0和DENCLUE 2.0这两个变体之间的差异。这将允许未来对两个变体进行改进,并为特定类型的数据集确定最佳变体。使用调整后的Rand指数度量来评估两种算法聚类结果之间的差异。实验结果表明,DENCLUE 1.0在发现任意形状的簇方面优于DENCLUE 2.0。具体来说,在包含具有多个模式的集群的数据集中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Comparison of Two Algorithms for Arbitrary Shapes Clustering
Discovering clusters with arbitrary shapes has attracted a large number of researchers, due to its importance in analyzing real-world datasets. DENCLUE is an efficient density-based algorithm that provides a compact mathematical definition of clusters with arbitrary shapes. Several variants of DENCLUE have been proposed to enhance its performance, including DENCLUE 2.0. This study aims to discuss the difference between the two variants, DENCLUE 1.0 and DENCLUE 2.0. This will allow for future improvements on both variants and determining the best variant for specific types of datasets. The Adjusted Rand Index measure is used to evaluate the difference between the clustering results of both algorithms. The experimental results conclude that DECNLUE 1.0 outperforms DENCLUE 2.0 in discovering clusters with arbitrary shapes. Specifically, in datasets that contain clusters with multiple modes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信