支付还是不支付:禁令规范对慈善捐赠影响的实证检验

David Mcclough, Randall L. Ewing, S. Schertzer
{"title":"支付还是不支付:禁令规范对慈善捐赠影响的实证检验","authors":"David Mcclough, Randall L. Ewing, S. Schertzer","doi":"10.59604/1046-2309.1005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CHARITABLE ENDEAVORS OFTEN FACE RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS AND RELY ON ALTRUISM FOR MONETARY DONATIONS NECESSARY TO PURSUE MISSION-DRIVEN OPERATIONS. IMPLEMENTATION OF AN HONOR-BASED PAYMENT SYSTEM TO ATTRACT DONATIONS ATTEMPTS TO ELIMINATE SOME PORTION OF THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH FUNDRAISING ACTIVITY. HOWEVER, HONOR-BASED SYSTEMS ARE NOT MONITORED AND, THEREFORE, SUSCEPTIBLE TO UNDERPAYMENT AND THEFT. THIS STUDY EXAMINES HOW POSTING A MESSAGE COMMUNICATING A NEGATIVE INJUNCTIVE NORM AFFECTS CHARITABLE DONATIONS RESULTING FROM PROVISION OF A SNACK BOX USING AN HONOR-BASED PAYMENT SYSTEM. THE STUDY FINDS THAT PRESENTATION OF AN INJUNCTIVE NORM DISSUADES CONTRIBUTIONS FROM DONORS INCLINED TOWARD SLIGHT UNDERPAYMENT BUT DOES NOT DETER GROSS UNDERPAYMENT OR THEFT. THE OVERALL EFFECT IS A DECLINE IN DONATIONS. THE STUDY CONCLUDES BY IDENTIFYING INSIGHTS LIKELY TO IMPROVE THE PROBABILITY OF SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF AN HONOR-BASED SNACK BOX INTENDED FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES. 1 McClough et al.: To Pay or Not to Pay Published by Carroll Collected, 2015 100 INTRODUCTION On January 1, 2008, Radiohead famously debuted its album In Rainbows to its website only, instructing fans to pay whatever they felt the album was worth. Years later we know that fewer than half of the downloads were accompanied by a payment. What is challenging to economists is not that half of the album downloads were not accompanied by a payment, rather that nearly half of them were accompanied by a payment. More recently, an established restaurant chain introduced a “pay-what-youwant” policy intended to make a nutritious bowl of chili available to all — especially to those who needed it. Initial reports suggested that patrons paid a bit more to make the chili available to those unable to pay full price. Whether the program is an innovative pricing strategy or a savvy public relations scheme, the sustainability of the program ultimately is determined by the willingness of customers to cover the costs. Sustainable honor-based payment systems defy economists’ expectations. Why would anyone pay for something if not required to do so? In reality quite a few people make payment voluntarily in exchange for goods and services. This case study examines voluntary contributions associated with a snack box. As with Radiohead and the bowl of chili, payment is entirely voluntary. We test different message strategies to evoke preferred behavior; specifically, we test message strategies to promote larger voluntary contributions.","PeriodicalId":354997,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Economics and Politics","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Pay or Not to Pay: An Empirical Examination of the Effect of Injunctive Norms on Charitable Donations\",\"authors\":\"David Mcclough, Randall L. Ewing, S. Schertzer\",\"doi\":\"10.59604/1046-2309.1005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CHARITABLE ENDEAVORS OFTEN FACE RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS AND RELY ON ALTRUISM FOR MONETARY DONATIONS NECESSARY TO PURSUE MISSION-DRIVEN OPERATIONS. IMPLEMENTATION OF AN HONOR-BASED PAYMENT SYSTEM TO ATTRACT DONATIONS ATTEMPTS TO ELIMINATE SOME PORTION OF THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH FUNDRAISING ACTIVITY. HOWEVER, HONOR-BASED SYSTEMS ARE NOT MONITORED AND, THEREFORE, SUSCEPTIBLE TO UNDERPAYMENT AND THEFT. THIS STUDY EXAMINES HOW POSTING A MESSAGE COMMUNICATING A NEGATIVE INJUNCTIVE NORM AFFECTS CHARITABLE DONATIONS RESULTING FROM PROVISION OF A SNACK BOX USING AN HONOR-BASED PAYMENT SYSTEM. THE STUDY FINDS THAT PRESENTATION OF AN INJUNCTIVE NORM DISSUADES CONTRIBUTIONS FROM DONORS INCLINED TOWARD SLIGHT UNDERPAYMENT BUT DOES NOT DETER GROSS UNDERPAYMENT OR THEFT. THE OVERALL EFFECT IS A DECLINE IN DONATIONS. THE STUDY CONCLUDES BY IDENTIFYING INSIGHTS LIKELY TO IMPROVE THE PROBABILITY OF SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF AN HONOR-BASED SNACK BOX INTENDED FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES. 1 McClough et al.: To Pay or Not to Pay Published by Carroll Collected, 2015 100 INTRODUCTION On January 1, 2008, Radiohead famously debuted its album In Rainbows to its website only, instructing fans to pay whatever they felt the album was worth. Years later we know that fewer than half of the downloads were accompanied by a payment. What is challenging to economists is not that half of the album downloads were not accompanied by a payment, rather that nearly half of them were accompanied by a payment. More recently, an established restaurant chain introduced a “pay-what-youwant” policy intended to make a nutritious bowl of chili available to all — especially to those who needed it. Initial reports suggested that patrons paid a bit more to make the chili available to those unable to pay full price. Whether the program is an innovative pricing strategy or a savvy public relations scheme, the sustainability of the program ultimately is determined by the willingness of customers to cover the costs. Sustainable honor-based payment systems defy economists’ expectations. Why would anyone pay for something if not required to do so? In reality quite a few people make payment voluntarily in exchange for goods and services. This case study examines voluntary contributions associated with a snack box. As with Radiohead and the bowl of chili, payment is entirely voluntary. We test different message strategies to evoke preferred behavior; specifically, we test message strategies to promote larger voluntary contributions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Economics and Politics\",\"volume\":\"195 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Economics and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59604/1046-2309.1005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Economics and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59604/1046-2309.1005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慈善事业往往面临资源限制,依靠利他主义的金钱捐赠来追求使命驱动的运作。实施以荣誉为基础的支付制度来吸引捐款,试图消除与筹款活动有关的部分成本。但是,以荣誉为基础的制度没有受到监测,因此容易出现少付和盗窃的情况。本研究考察了发布一条传达负面禁令规范的信息如何影响使用基于荣誉的支付系统提供零食盒所产生的慈善捐赠。研究发现,禁令规范的提出劝阻了倾向于轻微少付的捐助者的捐款,但并没有阻止严重少付或盗窃。总体效果是捐款减少。该研究的结论是,确定了可能提高成功实施以荣誉为基础的慈善点心盒的可能性的见解。2008年1月1日,Radiohead的著名专辑《In Rainbows》只在其网站上发布,并指导粉丝们按照他们认为这张专辑值多少钱来付费。几年后,我们知道只有不到一半的下载是付费的。经济学家面临的挑战不是一半的专辑下载没有伴随着付款,而是近一半的下载伴随着付款。最近,一家老牌连锁餐厅推出了“按需付费”政策,旨在为所有人提供一碗营养丰富的辣椒,尤其是那些需要的人。最初的报道显示,顾客们花了更多的钱,让那些无法支付全价的人买到辣椒。无论该计划是一个创新的定价策略还是一个精明的公关计划,该计划的可持续性最终取决于客户支付成本的意愿。可持续的以荣誉为基础的薪酬体系违背了经济学家的预期。如果没有要求,为什么会有人付钱呢?在现实中,相当多的人自愿支付以换取商品和服务。本案例研究考察了与零食盒相关的自愿捐款。就像电台司令和一碗辣椒一样,付款完全是自愿的。我们测试了不同的消息策略来唤起偏好行为;具体来说,我们测试消息策略,以促进更大的自愿捐款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To Pay or Not to Pay: An Empirical Examination of the Effect of Injunctive Norms on Charitable Donations
CHARITABLE ENDEAVORS OFTEN FACE RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS AND RELY ON ALTRUISM FOR MONETARY DONATIONS NECESSARY TO PURSUE MISSION-DRIVEN OPERATIONS. IMPLEMENTATION OF AN HONOR-BASED PAYMENT SYSTEM TO ATTRACT DONATIONS ATTEMPTS TO ELIMINATE SOME PORTION OF THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH FUNDRAISING ACTIVITY. HOWEVER, HONOR-BASED SYSTEMS ARE NOT MONITORED AND, THEREFORE, SUSCEPTIBLE TO UNDERPAYMENT AND THEFT. THIS STUDY EXAMINES HOW POSTING A MESSAGE COMMUNICATING A NEGATIVE INJUNCTIVE NORM AFFECTS CHARITABLE DONATIONS RESULTING FROM PROVISION OF A SNACK BOX USING AN HONOR-BASED PAYMENT SYSTEM. THE STUDY FINDS THAT PRESENTATION OF AN INJUNCTIVE NORM DISSUADES CONTRIBUTIONS FROM DONORS INCLINED TOWARD SLIGHT UNDERPAYMENT BUT DOES NOT DETER GROSS UNDERPAYMENT OR THEFT. THE OVERALL EFFECT IS A DECLINE IN DONATIONS. THE STUDY CONCLUDES BY IDENTIFYING INSIGHTS LIKELY TO IMPROVE THE PROBABILITY OF SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF AN HONOR-BASED SNACK BOX INTENDED FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES. 1 McClough et al.: To Pay or Not to Pay Published by Carroll Collected, 2015 100 INTRODUCTION On January 1, 2008, Radiohead famously debuted its album In Rainbows to its website only, instructing fans to pay whatever they felt the album was worth. Years later we know that fewer than half of the downloads were accompanied by a payment. What is challenging to economists is not that half of the album downloads were not accompanied by a payment, rather that nearly half of them were accompanied by a payment. More recently, an established restaurant chain introduced a “pay-what-youwant” policy intended to make a nutritious bowl of chili available to all — especially to those who needed it. Initial reports suggested that patrons paid a bit more to make the chili available to those unable to pay full price. Whether the program is an innovative pricing strategy or a savvy public relations scheme, the sustainability of the program ultimately is determined by the willingness of customers to cover the costs. Sustainable honor-based payment systems defy economists’ expectations. Why would anyone pay for something if not required to do so? In reality quite a few people make payment voluntarily in exchange for goods and services. This case study examines voluntary contributions associated with a snack box. As with Radiohead and the bowl of chili, payment is entirely voluntary. We test different message strategies to evoke preferred behavior; specifically, we test message strategies to promote larger voluntary contributions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信