FIPP p-cycles保护网状网络的可用性感知设计

A. Ranjbar, C. Assi
{"title":"FIPP p-cycles保护网状网络的可用性感知设计","authors":"A. Ranjbar, C. Assi","doi":"10.1109/ONDM.2008.4578414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Failure-independent path-protecting (FIPP) p-cycle is an extension of the basic p-cycle and an alternative approach for providing fully pre-connected protection paths with end-to-end failure-independent path protection property. We study the unavailability of end-to-end traffic in FIPP based mesh networks, which are designed to protect against single failures and present an availability-aware network design method. Our results show that although FIPP is more efficient in terms of spare capacity redundancy than basic p-cycle (Kodian et. al, 2005 ), when the network design limits the service unavailability, FIPP tends to be less efficient and its redundancy is 8-13% more than basic p-cycle. We present our analysis and discussions on these findings.","PeriodicalId":155835,"journal":{"name":"2008 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Availability-aware design in FIPP p-cycles protected mesh networks\",\"authors\":\"A. Ranjbar, C. Assi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ONDM.2008.4578414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Failure-independent path-protecting (FIPP) p-cycle is an extension of the basic p-cycle and an alternative approach for providing fully pre-connected protection paths with end-to-end failure-independent path protection property. We study the unavailability of end-to-end traffic in FIPP based mesh networks, which are designed to protect against single failures and present an availability-aware network design method. Our results show that although FIPP is more efficient in terms of spare capacity redundancy than basic p-cycle (Kodian et. al, 2005 ), when the network design limits the service unavailability, FIPP tends to be less efficient and its redundancy is 8-13% more than basic p-cycle. We present our analysis and discussions on these findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":155835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ONDM.2008.4578414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ONDM.2008.4578414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

故障无关路径保护(FIPP) p-cycle是基本p-cycle的扩展,是提供具有端到端故障无关路径保护特性的完全预连接保护路径的替代方法。我们研究了基于FIPP的网状网络中端到端流量的不可用性,该网络旨在防止单个故障,并提出了一种可用性感知的网络设计方法。我们的研究结果表明,尽管FIPP在备用容量冗余方面比基本p-cycle更有效(Kodian et. al, 2005),但当网络设计限制了服务不可用性时,FIPP的效率往往较低,其冗余比基本p-cycle高8-13%。我们对这些发现进行了分析和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Availability-aware design in FIPP p-cycles protected mesh networks
Failure-independent path-protecting (FIPP) p-cycle is an extension of the basic p-cycle and an alternative approach for providing fully pre-connected protection paths with end-to-end failure-independent path protection property. We study the unavailability of end-to-end traffic in FIPP based mesh networks, which are designed to protect against single failures and present an availability-aware network design method. Our results show that although FIPP is more efficient in terms of spare capacity redundancy than basic p-cycle (Kodian et. al, 2005 ), when the network design limits the service unavailability, FIPP tends to be less efficient and its redundancy is 8-13% more than basic p-cycle. We present our analysis and discussions on these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信