巴西sÃo paulo / sp一家大型综合医院的触发工具和不良药物事件

Carleide de Souza Barbosa Costa, Marcia Eugenia del Llano Archondo
{"title":"巴西sÃo paulo / sp一家大型综合医院的触发工具和不良药物事件","authors":"Carleide de Souza Barbosa Costa, Marcia Eugenia del Llano Archondo","doi":"10.56242/globalhealth;2022;2;6;12-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the main adverse drug events (ADEs), and its severity in patients of a large public hospital in São Paulo city using trigger tools and to evaluate its performance. METHODS: This is a prospective study with adults hospitalized in the units of Surgical Center, Medical Clinic, Intensive Care Unit, Adult Emergency Room and Obstetrics, during a period of two months (May to June 2021). Clinical records were reviewed using eleven different trigger tools selected from the Global Trigger Tools of the Institute of Healthcare and adapted to the Hospital reality. Only trigger medications were used. The active search was performed using Hospital’s computerized system and when the prescription of a trigger drug was identified, the pharmacist analyzed the patient’s medical record. RESULTS: There were identified 183 patients with trigger medication prescription. Of these 14,7% presented adverse drug event and were admitted at Medical Clinic (48%). The ADEs identified were pruritus/ skin rash, coumarin poisoning/bleeding, anaphylaxis, excessive sedation, and headache. Considering the severity, 93,6% were moderate and 3,7% severe. The drugs with highest incidence of ADEs were morphine and warfarin. The best performing trigger tools were protamine and flumazenil, and the lowest performing were hydrocortisone and promethazine. CONCLUSION: Trigger tools can be used to identify adverse drug reactions. Its use in hospitals improve patients’ medication safety.","PeriodicalId":285800,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TRIGGER TOOLS AND ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS AT A LARGE GENERAL HOSPITAL IN SÃO PAULO/SP, BRAZIL\",\"authors\":\"Carleide de Souza Barbosa Costa, Marcia Eugenia del Llano Archondo\",\"doi\":\"10.56242/globalhealth;2022;2;6;12-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the main adverse drug events (ADEs), and its severity in patients of a large public hospital in São Paulo city using trigger tools and to evaluate its performance. METHODS: This is a prospective study with adults hospitalized in the units of Surgical Center, Medical Clinic, Intensive Care Unit, Adult Emergency Room and Obstetrics, during a period of two months (May to June 2021). Clinical records were reviewed using eleven different trigger tools selected from the Global Trigger Tools of the Institute of Healthcare and adapted to the Hospital reality. Only trigger medications were used. The active search was performed using Hospital’s computerized system and when the prescription of a trigger drug was identified, the pharmacist analyzed the patient’s medical record. RESULTS: There were identified 183 patients with trigger medication prescription. Of these 14,7% presented adverse drug event and were admitted at Medical Clinic (48%). The ADEs identified were pruritus/ skin rash, coumarin poisoning/bleeding, anaphylaxis, excessive sedation, and headache. Considering the severity, 93,6% were moderate and 3,7% severe. The drugs with highest incidence of ADEs were morphine and warfarin. The best performing trigger tools were protamine and flumazenil, and the lowest performing were hydrocortisone and promethazine. CONCLUSION: Trigger tools can be used to identify adverse drug reactions. Its use in hospitals improve patients’ medication safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56242/globalhealth;2022;2;6;12-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56242/globalhealth;2022;2;6;12-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定圣保罗市一家大型公立医院患者使用触发工具的主要药物不良事件(ADEs)及其严重程度,并评价其表现。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,在手术中心、内科诊所、重症监护病房、成人急诊室和产科住院的成年人,为期两个月(2021年5月至6月)。使用11种不同的触发工具对临床记录进行了审查,这些工具是从医疗保健研究所的全球触发工具中选择的,并根据医院的实际情况进行了调整。只使用了触发药物。使用医院的计算机系统进行主动搜索,当确定触发药物的处方时,药剂师分析患者的医疗记录。结果:共鉴定出183例患者的触发用药处方。其中14.7%的患者出现药物不良事件并在医疗诊所就诊(48%)。发现的不良反应包括瘙痒/皮疹、香豆素中毒/出血、过敏反应、过度镇静和头痛。从严重程度来看,93.6%为中度,3.7%为重度。发生率最高的药物为吗啡和华法林。效果最好的触发工具是鱼精蛋白和氟马西尼,效果最差的是氢化可的松和异丙嗪。结论:触发工具可用于药物不良反应的识别。它在医院的使用提高了患者的用药安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TRIGGER TOOLS AND ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS AT A LARGE GENERAL HOSPITAL IN SÃO PAULO/SP, BRAZIL
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the main adverse drug events (ADEs), and its severity in patients of a large public hospital in São Paulo city using trigger tools and to evaluate its performance. METHODS: This is a prospective study with adults hospitalized in the units of Surgical Center, Medical Clinic, Intensive Care Unit, Adult Emergency Room and Obstetrics, during a period of two months (May to June 2021). Clinical records were reviewed using eleven different trigger tools selected from the Global Trigger Tools of the Institute of Healthcare and adapted to the Hospital reality. Only trigger medications were used. The active search was performed using Hospital’s computerized system and when the prescription of a trigger drug was identified, the pharmacist analyzed the patient’s medical record. RESULTS: There were identified 183 patients with trigger medication prescription. Of these 14,7% presented adverse drug event and were admitted at Medical Clinic (48%). The ADEs identified were pruritus/ skin rash, coumarin poisoning/bleeding, anaphylaxis, excessive sedation, and headache. Considering the severity, 93,6% were moderate and 3,7% severe. The drugs with highest incidence of ADEs were morphine and warfarin. The best performing trigger tools were protamine and flumazenil, and the lowest performing were hydrocortisone and promethazine. CONCLUSION: Trigger tools can be used to identify adverse drug reactions. Its use in hospitals improve patients’ medication safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信