尼日利亚上市公司资本结构的决定因素

Oluseun A. Paseda
{"title":"尼日利亚上市公司资本结构的决定因素","authors":"Oluseun A. Paseda","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2890900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical work on capital structure in emerging markets like Nigeria has been limited and met with low explanatory power. This study investigates the determinants of capital structure in Nigeria. Unlike prior work, the study investigates capital structure determinants along five dimensions namely: firm-specific and industry factors; taxes; non-financial stakeholders; supply-side factors; and the maturity structure of corporate liabilities. The population of study comprises all non-financial corporations quoted on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) for the period 1999-2014 out of which 50 companies that met the minimum data criteria were utilized. Using panel data least squares regression, modified to weighted (cross section- and period-) models, the research documents the following findings. First, the factors that exert positive influence on corporate borrowing include asset intangibility, firm age and expected inflation while those factors that exert negative influence on capital structure include asset tangibility, growth, size, volatility of earnings, profitability, liquidity, dividend-paying status and uniqueness of industry. Second, there is weak evidence that tax considerations are crucial in capital structure choice. The results were, at best, mixed with respect to the portability of pecking order, target adjustment, trade-off, agency and market conditions models. The pecking order beats the trade-off model based on the signs of coefficients of firm-specific characteristics including the marginal tax rate. In order words, asymmetric information explains why smaller, less profitable, less liquid firms with more risky intangible assets and which are low dividend-payers end up relying primarily on debt financing and vice versa. The study also supports the target adjustment and market conditions models. Third, this study provides new evidence that financing decisions interact with non-financial stakeholders. Specifically, the results support the use of capital structure as a possible bargaining variable by employees, suppliers and customers. Highly levered firms exert pressure on themselves to treat non-financial stakeholders decently. Fourth, there is strong evidence in support of supply-side of capital as leverage increases with debt market access but behaves counter-cyclically as it declines with equity market conditions, term spread and GDP growth rate. The study recommends the use of leases for financially- and collateral-constrained firms, non-debt tax shelters for corporate tax planning, government simplification of tax administration, cautious use of debt for industries with production technologies that place NFS at risk and macroeconomic policies that promote prudent use of debt and debt maturity.","PeriodicalId":166116,"journal":{"name":"Ohio State University","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Determinants of Capital Structure of Nigerian Quoted Firms\",\"authors\":\"Oluseun A. Paseda\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2890900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empirical work on capital structure in emerging markets like Nigeria has been limited and met with low explanatory power. This study investigates the determinants of capital structure in Nigeria. Unlike prior work, the study investigates capital structure determinants along five dimensions namely: firm-specific and industry factors; taxes; non-financial stakeholders; supply-side factors; and the maturity structure of corporate liabilities. The population of study comprises all non-financial corporations quoted on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) for the period 1999-2014 out of which 50 companies that met the minimum data criteria were utilized. Using panel data least squares regression, modified to weighted (cross section- and period-) models, the research documents the following findings. First, the factors that exert positive influence on corporate borrowing include asset intangibility, firm age and expected inflation while those factors that exert negative influence on capital structure include asset tangibility, growth, size, volatility of earnings, profitability, liquidity, dividend-paying status and uniqueness of industry. Second, there is weak evidence that tax considerations are crucial in capital structure choice. The results were, at best, mixed with respect to the portability of pecking order, target adjustment, trade-off, agency and market conditions models. The pecking order beats the trade-off model based on the signs of coefficients of firm-specific characteristics including the marginal tax rate. In order words, asymmetric information explains why smaller, less profitable, less liquid firms with more risky intangible assets and which are low dividend-payers end up relying primarily on debt financing and vice versa. The study also supports the target adjustment and market conditions models. Third, this study provides new evidence that financing decisions interact with non-financial stakeholders. Specifically, the results support the use of capital structure as a possible bargaining variable by employees, suppliers and customers. Highly levered firms exert pressure on themselves to treat non-financial stakeholders decently. Fourth, there is strong evidence in support of supply-side of capital as leverage increases with debt market access but behaves counter-cyclically as it declines with equity market conditions, term spread and GDP growth rate. The study recommends the use of leases for financially- and collateral-constrained firms, non-debt tax shelters for corporate tax planning, government simplification of tax administration, cautious use of debt for industries with production technologies that place NFS at risk and macroeconomic policies that promote prudent use of debt and debt maturity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ohio State University\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ohio State University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2890900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2890900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

对尼日利亚等新兴市场资本结构的实证研究一直很有限,解释力也很低。本研究探讨了尼日利亚资本结构的决定因素。与之前的工作不同,本研究从五个维度调查资本结构决定因素,即:企业特定因素和行业因素;税收;非财务利益相关者;供应方面的因素;以及公司负债的期限结构。研究对象包括1999-2014年期间在尼日利亚证券交易所(NSE)上市的所有非金融公司,其中50家公司符合最低数据标准。使用面板数据最小二乘回归,修改为加权(横截面和周期)模型,研究记录了以下发现。首先,对企业借款产生正向影响的因素包括资产无形性、企业成立年限和预期通货膨胀率,对资本结构产生负向影响的因素包括资产无形性、成长性、规模、收益波动性、盈利能力、流动性、股利支付状况和行业独特性。其次,没有充分证据表明税收因素在资本结构选择中至关重要。在等级顺序、目标调整、权衡、代理和市场条件模型的可移植性方面,结果充其量是喜忧参半。啄序优于基于企业特定特征(包括边际税率)系数符号的权衡模型。换句话说,信息不对称解释了为什么规模较小、利润较低、流动性较差、无形资产风险较高、派息率较低的公司最终主要依赖债务融资,反之亦然。研究还支持目标调整模型和市场条件模型。第三,本研究提供了融资决策与非财务利益相关者互动的新证据。具体而言,研究结果支持员工、供应商和客户使用资本结构作为可能的议价变量。高杠杆的公司会给自己施加压力,要求他们体面地对待非金融利益相关者。第四,有强有力的证据支持资本供给侧,因为杠杆率随着债务市场准入而上升,但随着股市状况、期限价差和GDP增长率而下降,其表现出反周期性。该研究建议对资金和抵押品受限的公司使用租赁,对公司税收规划使用非债务避税,政府简化税收管理,对生产技术使NFS面临风险的行业谨慎使用债务,以及促进审慎使用债务和债务期限的宏观经济政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Determinants of Capital Structure of Nigerian Quoted Firms
Empirical work on capital structure in emerging markets like Nigeria has been limited and met with low explanatory power. This study investigates the determinants of capital structure in Nigeria. Unlike prior work, the study investigates capital structure determinants along five dimensions namely: firm-specific and industry factors; taxes; non-financial stakeholders; supply-side factors; and the maturity structure of corporate liabilities. The population of study comprises all non-financial corporations quoted on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) for the period 1999-2014 out of which 50 companies that met the minimum data criteria were utilized. Using panel data least squares regression, modified to weighted (cross section- and period-) models, the research documents the following findings. First, the factors that exert positive influence on corporate borrowing include asset intangibility, firm age and expected inflation while those factors that exert negative influence on capital structure include asset tangibility, growth, size, volatility of earnings, profitability, liquidity, dividend-paying status and uniqueness of industry. Second, there is weak evidence that tax considerations are crucial in capital structure choice. The results were, at best, mixed with respect to the portability of pecking order, target adjustment, trade-off, agency and market conditions models. The pecking order beats the trade-off model based on the signs of coefficients of firm-specific characteristics including the marginal tax rate. In order words, asymmetric information explains why smaller, less profitable, less liquid firms with more risky intangible assets and which are low dividend-payers end up relying primarily on debt financing and vice versa. The study also supports the target adjustment and market conditions models. Third, this study provides new evidence that financing decisions interact with non-financial stakeholders. Specifically, the results support the use of capital structure as a possible bargaining variable by employees, suppliers and customers. Highly levered firms exert pressure on themselves to treat non-financial stakeholders decently. Fourth, there is strong evidence in support of supply-side of capital as leverage increases with debt market access but behaves counter-cyclically as it declines with equity market conditions, term spread and GDP growth rate. The study recommends the use of leases for financially- and collateral-constrained firms, non-debt tax shelters for corporate tax planning, government simplification of tax administration, cautious use of debt for industries with production technologies that place NFS at risk and macroeconomic policies that promote prudent use of debt and debt maturity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信