眼打字过程中的认知负荷

Tanya Bafna, J. P. Hansen, Per Baekgaard
{"title":"眼打字过程中的认知负荷","authors":"Tanya Bafna, J. P. Hansen, Per Baekgaard","doi":"10.1145/3379155.3391333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we have measured cognitive load during an interactive eye-tracking task. Eye-typing was chosen as the task, because of its familiarity, ubiquitousness and ease. Experiments with 18 participants, where they memorized and eye-typed easy and difficult sentences over four days, were used to compare the difficulty levels of the tasks using subjective scores and eye-metrics like blink duration, frequency and interval and pupil dilation were explored, in addition to performance measures like typing speed, error rate and attended but not selected rate. Typing performance lowered with increased task difficulty, while blink frequency, duration and interval were higher for the difficult tasks. Pupil dilation indicated the memorization process, but did not demonstrate a difference between easy and difficult tasks.","PeriodicalId":226088,"journal":{"name":"ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Load during Eye-typing\",\"authors\":\"Tanya Bafna, J. P. Hansen, Per Baekgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3379155.3391333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we have measured cognitive load during an interactive eye-tracking task. Eye-typing was chosen as the task, because of its familiarity, ubiquitousness and ease. Experiments with 18 participants, where they memorized and eye-typed easy and difficult sentences over four days, were used to compare the difficulty levels of the tasks using subjective scores and eye-metrics like blink duration, frequency and interval and pupil dilation were explored, in addition to performance measures like typing speed, error rate and attended but not selected rate. Typing performance lowered with increased task difficulty, while blink frequency, duration and interval were higher for the difficult tasks. Pupil dilation indicated the memorization process, but did not demonstrate a difference between easy and difficult tasks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3379155.3391333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3379155.3391333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在本文中,我们测量了交互眼动追踪任务中的认知负荷。选择眼打字作为这项任务,是因为它熟悉、普遍和容易。研究人员对18名参与者进行了实验,让他们在四天内记忆和用眼睛输入简单和困难的句子,并用主观得分来比较任务的难度水平。此外,研究人员还研究了眨眼持续时间、频率、间隔和瞳孔扩张等眼部指标,以及打字速度、错误率和参加但未选择的比率等表现指标。打字表现随着任务难度的增加而下降,而在难度较高的任务中,眨眼频率、持续时间和间隔时间更高。瞳孔扩张显示了记忆过程,但没有显示出简单和困难任务之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive Load during Eye-typing
In this paper, we have measured cognitive load during an interactive eye-tracking task. Eye-typing was chosen as the task, because of its familiarity, ubiquitousness and ease. Experiments with 18 participants, where they memorized and eye-typed easy and difficult sentences over four days, were used to compare the difficulty levels of the tasks using subjective scores and eye-metrics like blink duration, frequency and interval and pupil dilation were explored, in addition to performance measures like typing speed, error rate and attended but not selected rate. Typing performance lowered with increased task difficulty, while blink frequency, duration and interval were higher for the difficult tasks. Pupil dilation indicated the memorization process, but did not demonstrate a difference between easy and difficult tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信